Post a reply
10/29/2010 2:48 pm
artie_fufkin wrote:
Another classic. Makes me wish we did plaintiff's work. It would be so much easier for me to get my marketing hours.
Dancers at Adult Entertainment Club
May Pursue FLSA Class Suit, Court Rules
Dancers at a New York City strip club may pursue a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action alleging that the club's policies toward the dancers violated federal minimum wage and overtime pay regulations, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided Oct. 26 (In re Penthouse Exec. Club Comp. Litig., S.D.N.Y., No. 10 Civ. 1145, 10/26/10).I'm not sure I'd want to be in the same room with a stripper who doesn't warrant minimum wage.
Fair enough. We'll limit our client base to those who claim they've been denied overtime.
10/29/2010 1:57 pm
Another classic. Makes me wish we did plaintiff's work. It would be so much easier for me to get my marketing hours.
Dancers at Adult Entertainment Club
May Pursue FLSA Class Suit, Court Rules
Dancers at a New York City strip club may pursue a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action alleging that the club's policies toward the dancers violated federal minimum wage and overtime pay regulations, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided Oct. 26 (In re Penthouse Exec. Club Comp. Litig., S.D.N.Y., No. 10 Civ. 1145, 10/26/10).
I'm not sure I'd want to be in the same room with a stripper who doesn't warrant minimum wage.
10/29/2010 1:55 pm
We had this gem come across the courthouse reporter a few weeks back
Danielle Dyer
v.
Dirty World LLC; Tommy Duecker
9/21/2010 10SL-CC03797
(Clayton)
Defamation action. The defendants published false information about the plaintiff including that she gave Duecker and his friend a venereal disease and that she was willing to have sex with two guys at one time.
The depositions should have serious entertainment value.Especially if the friend is Chuck Berry ...
I told you the Chuck Berry deposition story, didn't I?
(shocked) (shocked) (shocked) (shocked) (shocked)
Yes, you did. And I'll never be able to think about anything else whenever his name is mentioned.
10/29/2010 11:26 am
Another classic. Makes me wish we did plaintiff's work. It would be so much easier for me to get my marketing hours.
Dancers at Adult Entertainment Club
May Pursue FLSA Class Suit, Court Rules
Dancers at a New York City strip club may pursue a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action alleging that the club's policies toward the dancers violated federal minimum wage and overtime pay regulations, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided Oct. 26 (In re Penthouse Exec. Club Comp. Litig., S.D.N.Y., No. 10 Civ. 1145, 10/26/10).
10/29/2010 11:24 am
We had this gem come across the courthouse reporter a few weeks back
Danielle Dyer
v.
Dirty World LLC; Tommy Duecker
9/21/2010 10SL-CC03797
(Clayton)
Defamation action. The defendants published false information about the plaintiff including that she gave Duecker and his friend a venereal disease and that she was willing to have sex with two guys at one time.
The depositions should have serious entertainment value.Especially if the friend is Chuck Berry ...
I told you the Chuck Berry deposition story, didn't I?
(shocked) (shocked) (shocked) (shocked) (shocked)
10/21/2010 6:49 pm
We had this gem come across the courthouse reporter a few weeks back
Danielle Dyer
v.
Dirty World LLC; Tommy Duecker
9/21/2010 10SL-CC03797
(Clayton)
Defamation action. The defendants published false information about the plaintiff including that she gave Duecker and his friend a venereal disease and that she was willing to have sex with two guys at one time.
The depositions should have serious entertainment value.
Especially if the friend is Chuck Berry ...
10/21/2010 6:47 pm
Does this mean I sue Steak & Shake because that stupid talking hat in its commercials offends my retinas and eardrums?
10/21/2010 5:04 pm
We had this gem come across the courthouse reporter a few weeks back
Danielle Dyer
v.
Dirty World LLC; Tommy Duecker
9/21/2010 10SL-CC03797
(Clayton)
Defamation action. The defendants published false information about the plaintiff including that she gave Duecker and his friend a venereal disease and that she was willing to have sex with two guys at one time.
The depositions should have serious entertainment value.
Seems like they may have a counterclaim for unjust enrichment.
10/21/2010 3:58 pm
We had this gem come across the courthouse reporter a few weeks back
Danielle Dyer
v.
Dirty World LLC; Tommy Duecker
9/21/2010 10SL-CC03797
(Clayton)
Defamation action. The defendants published false information about the plaintiff including that she gave Duecker and his friend a venereal disease and that she was willing to have sex with two guys at one time.
The depositions should have serious entertainment value.