artie_fufkin wrote:
No rhythm, but great hair. I give him an 82.
*BOINK!*
Good one, Artie!
don.rob11 wrote:
The man didn't age for 70 years , but began to show it in the last 2 or 3 .....
I don't know if I've ever felt worse for a public figure than I did when I saw him this past New Year's Eve. Someone should have had the sense to tell him going on TV wasn't a good idea.
The man didn't age for 70 years , but began to show it in the last 2 or 3 .....
No rhythm, but great hair. I give him an 82.
*BOINK!*