Post a reply
8/08/2013 8:39 am
She should have just saved time and blew the judge.
8/07/2013 1:32 pm
forsberg_us wrote:
The Constitution prohibits laws which impairs a party's contract rights. Seems to me Rule 1.8(j) is unconstitutional.
Constitutionally-protected nookie. It's why being an American in a beautiful thing.
8/07/2013 1:16 pm
The Constitution prohibits laws which impairs a party's contract rights. Seems to me Rule 1.8(j) is unconstitutional.
8/07/2013 12:08 pm
"According to the petition, there are no other documented cases in Pennsylvania involving a violation of Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(j), which became effective January 1, 2005, and prohibits sexual relations between a lawyer and a client regardless of whether it's consensual and whether it prejudices the client."
Hypothetically, if the client is a prostitute and Pennsylvania law prohibits sexual relations with her attorney, couldn't that be construed as restraint of trade?
8/07/2013 11:37 am
Ok, Fors , I was really expecting to read about ; "I'll give you two hens for a bushel of peas" .... 