You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

  • Index
  •  » Life Stories
  •  » Ferguson riots - Michael Brown.
  • Post a reply

    Write your message and submit Help

    Usage Terms

    Go back

    Topic review (newest first):

    4/25/2024 10:43 am

    Доброго времени суток господа.
    Предлагаем Вашему вниманию изделия из стекла для дома и офиса.Наша организация ООО «СТЕКЛОЭЛИТ» работает 10 лет на рынке этой продукции в Беларуси.Офис сегодня – это не пыльная комната в панельном здании, а лицо компании, его визитная карточка. Во многом это определяет интерьер, но также огромное значение имеют дверные конструкции и стеклянные перегородки в офисе. Появившись в качестве перегородок достаточно давно, стеклянные стены использовались чаще всего просто в качестве разделителя помещения, и только недавно они вошли в список интерьерных изюминок. В своих конструкциях мы используем стекло от лучшего мирового производителя листового стекла AGC GLASS EUROPE.

    Мы можем предложить Вам:
    1)стеклянные ограждения–ограждения лестниц и балконов
    2)стеклянные двери-из закаленного ударопрочного стекла
    3)cтеклянные перегородки-офисные и в домашних интерьерах
    4)душевые перегородки-разнообразин цветовой гаммы фурнитуры и стекла
    5)стеклянные козырьки-красиво и стильно украсят фасад здания
    6)душевые из стекла-на любой выбор и вкус
    7)раздвижные перегородки из стекла-различные типы конструкций
    Более подробная информация размещена на нашем сайте
    Увидимся!
    козырек стеклянный цена
    стеклянные ограждения для лестниц цена
    стеклянные стены
    сервисное обслуживание стеклянных дверей
    установка стеклянных дверей
    межкомнатные перегородки купе
    стекло фото
    стеклянные матовые двери межкомнатные
    раздвижные душевые кабины
    купить стекло в дверь минск
    стеклянные перегородки кухни гостиной
    раздвижные двери
    административные перегородки
    стеклянное ограждение бассейна
    стеклянные перегородки для квартиры
    матовые раздвижные двери
    распашные стеклянные двери цены
    душевые двери купить
    душевые двери стеклянные раздвижные
    стеклянные двери и перегородки офисные
    стеклянные интерьеры
    изготовление стеклянных козырьков
    стеклянная дверь в туалет
    душевые уголки 100х100
    межкомнатные стеклянные двери в минске цены
    душевая кабина или душевой уголок
    современные перегородки
    интерьер из стекла
    душевой уголок распашные двери
    стеклянная лестница цена
    стеклянные двери межкомнатные фото в интерьере
    заказать раздвижные двери
    купить душевые стеклянные перегородки в минске
    передвижные перегородки
    перегородки из закаленного стекла минск
    стеклянные двери межкомнатные
    купить раздвижные стеклянные двери
    двери в душ из стекла
    установка стекол душевой кабины
    изготовление стеклянных дверей
    перегородки из стекла для ванной
    лестничное ограждение со стеклом
    заказать стеклянные перегородки в минске
    стеклянные двери для душа размеры
    душевая кабина 90х90
    остекленные перегородки
    мобильные стеклянные перегородки
    стеклянные изделия
    купить душевую кабину цены
    душевые кабины размеры и цены

    12/01/2014 3:14 pm

    tkihshbt wrote:

    I thought it was established that he was facing him and started coming toward him, but the dispute is the manner in which he did it. I just don't know how we go from "he's running away" to "wait a minute, I'm a black demon, so I'll just go back at him."

    TK, when it comes to this cases, there aren't many facts that have been uniformly accepted.

    As far as why Brown would go back at Wilson, I can't say definitively since I wasn't there. But I don't think its too far of a stretch to think Brown was in "fight or flight" mode. Having just robbed the convenience store, probably the foremost thing in his mind is not going to prison. That's consistent with the altercation at the car. If he doesn't feel he can outrun Wilson, and he isn't willing to just give up and go to prison, then his only other option is to attack. Given that he had apparently got the upper hand the first time, Brown may have felt it was his best option.

    12/01/2014 1:55 pm

    tkihshbt wrote:

    Second, what Brown did at the convenience store is irrelevant to the facts about what happened at the shooting that day, especially since Ferguson PD said that Wilson did not know anything about Brown being a suspect in the robbery, which just so happened to change when giving his testimony.

    Third, I still don't believe that human beings, even ones as large as Brown, morph into the Incredible Hulk and charge at a cop who just shot multiple times in your direction.
     

     

    First (second) point is completely false.  He didnt know it at the time he first saw the subjects.  After briefly interacting with them he figured it out and radioed for another unit.  Even if he never figured it out what happend at the gas station is very relevant because it explain motive and browns behavior.  You could not be more wrong. 

    Watch the video i posted.  The guy was shot in the gut and still kicked the officers ass.

    12/01/2014 1:44 pm

    The name in this is very ironic

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=23c7ovuSd2U

    Ill take my video of katie upton now

    12/01/2014 1:38 pm


    I guess this is where my belief for the cop comes in. I'm not sure how you get a guilty conviction off anything when one witness (45) swears MB didn't charge, didn't jump into the car, Wilson repeatedly shot at him when he was down, MB was busy though, somehow facing Wilson, while running away, somehow kneeling with his hands up while being shot at. 

    Witness 12 accurately testified there were 9 or 10, I mean 5 or 6, no I mean 8 shots fired.

    How in the hell can you prosecute someone with this???
    Uh.... tell me someone got a youtube of that magic.... Say what? He did at least have the grace to say that there were 10 or 11 shots fired. 

    12/01/2014 1:32 pm


    Just kind of an idea of where the witnesses were at.

    12/01/2014 1:25 pm


    tkihshbt wrote:

    alz wrote:

    I don't have the first clue. I certainly would have done things differently, beginning with not robbing the convenience store, throwing the clerk into the shelve, and ending with me doing what the officer asked me to. I however am not Michael Brown, and because of these differences between us, I'm alive. To ask me to believe, however, that an officer with a good record of 6 years used this stop to intentionally murder an 18 year old black kid in broad daylight for the most minor strong arm robbery ever seen, and not shoot the witness who was right there? That's too far for my imagination to reach without very solid proof.

    First, nobody ever said that Wilson set out that day to commit what would amount to first degree murder.

    Second, what Brown did at the convenience store is irrelevant to the facts about what happened at the shooting that day, especially since Ferguson PD said that Wilson did not know anything about Brown being a suspect in the robbery, which just so happened to change when giving his testimony.

    Third, I still don't believe that human beings, even ones as large as Brown, morph into the Incredible Hulk and charge at a cop who just shot multiple times in your direction.
     

    Someone had to make some crazy decisions. Either Brown came back at him, or Wilson murdered him without cause. There's no middle ground there really.

    Witnesses... There's a spreadsheet of all the key points and where the testimony is. It's all over the board. I think 5 witnesses swore Michael Brown was not even present during the exchange, and Darren Wilson was actually on a Buddhist sabatical to better understand flower structures... There's nothing you can accurately rely on there.

    Even the closest witness, who was there and saw the whole thing, who stood by and didn't help his friend, and didn't try to calm things down with the cop either. He did and said nothing as his friend was shot down in front of him. He couldn't even tell the Grand Jury how Michael Brown was try to pull away from the cop when he explained he had 2 handfuls of Cigarello's, and 2 hands against the car trying to break free. Apparently Mike Brown morphs into the Hulk, and it comes with two additional arms. Now that's a very threatening human being to reckon with.

    12/01/2014 12:58 pm

    alz wrote:

    I don't have the first clue. I certainly would have done things differently, beginning with not robbing the convenience store, throwing the clerk into the shelve, and ending with me doing what the officer asked me to. I however am not Michael Brown, and because of these differences between us, I'm alive. To ask me to believe, however, that an officer with a good record of 6 years used this stop to intentionally murder an 18 year old black kid in broad daylight for the most minor strong arm robbery ever seen, and not shoot the witness who was right there? That's too far for my imagination to reach without very solid proof.

    First, nobody ever said that Wilson set out that day to commit what would amount to first degree murder.

    Second, what Brown did at the convenience store is irrelevant to the facts about what happened at the shooting that day, especially since Ferguson PD said that Wilson did not know anything about Brown being a suspect in the robbery, which just so happened to change when giving his testimony.

    Third, I still don't believe that human beings, even ones as large as Brown, morph into the Incredible Hulk and charge at a cop who just shot multiple times in your direction.
     

    12/01/2014 12:54 pm

    I thought it was established that he was facing him and started coming toward him, but the dispute is the manner in which he did it. I just don't know how we go from "he's running away" to "wait a minute, I'm a black demon, so I'll just go back at him."

    12/01/2014 12:43 pm


    lol Dillon Taylor never made the front page of Yahoo. Civil rights leaders never went to Salt Lake City to protest the cruel murder of a citizen. I did see Boznian's nearly get into it with Brown protestors after a member of their community was fatally beaten by black teenagers with a hammer. I'm sure Jackson and Sharpton will be coming back through here to rebuke those Boznians for typical white racist behavior in objecting. 

    As far as how likely it is Brown did as the cop suggests... It sure seems from the evidence that Brown did as the cop suggests. I agree it's crazy for Brown to do this, but it's also crazy to assume a white cop working patrol pulled over two kids in the middle of a street in broad daylight and filled one of them (not both) full of holes. Why not pop the witness? Why not wait until nightfall where the entire neighborhood can't see?

    So if you're asking why Brown did what he did? My answer is:

    I don't have the first clue. I certainly would have done things differently, beginning with not robbing the convenience store, throwing the clerk into the shelve, and ending with me doing what the officer asked me to. I however am not Michael Brown, and because of these differences between us, I'm alive. To ask me to believe, however, that an officer with a good record of 6 years used this stop to intentionally murder an 18 year old black kid in broad daylight for the most minor strong arm robbery ever seen, and not shoot the witness who was right there? That's too far for my imagination to reach without very solid proof.

    12/01/2014 12:21 pm

    tkihshbt wrote:

    If you haven't seen people talking about Dillon Taylor, then you're not looking hard enough. It hasn't had the same amount of attention as the Michael Brown ordeal, but it's still been discussed.

    As for "The Mauler," it's truly interesting times when black people transform into demons, hulk up and charge a police officer shooting at them. Frankly, I think the story sounds about as likely as me banging Kate Upton, but...umm, okay.

    Then all you have to do is explain how the two blood stains (the two circles farthest to the right on the diagram) ended up 20+ feet further east than Mike Brown's body if he wasn't moving toward Wilson.

    Also the shell casings.  How do the shell casings (which kick right from a semi-automatic weapon) end up, in some cases, further east of Wilson's body unless Wilson was actually east of where Brown ultimately fell and moved back to the west as Brown was moving toward him?


    [img]http://media.kmov.com/images/363*264/SceneRender1.PNG[/img]

    12/01/2014 11:02 am

    If you haven't seen people talking about Dillon Taylor, then you're not looking hard enough. It hasn't had the same amount of attention as the Michael Brown ordeal, but it's still been discussed.

    As for "The Mauler," it's truly interesting times when black people transform into demons, hulk up and charge a police officer shooting at them. Frankly, I think the story sounds about as likely as me banging Kate Upton, but...umm, okay.

    12/01/2014 12:56 am


    artie_fufkin wrote:

    "How do you feel Officer Wilson failed?"

    Oh, I don't know. The dead body? I think we've exhausted all sides of the discussion here. If the three of you want to keep insisting we ought to live in a police state where a cop can shoot an unarmed kid and not have to answer for it, that's your prerogative. But I've got other things to do than bang my head against a wall with this issue.

    Sorry if a 300 pound kid manhandled him, and he felt his life was in danger after barely getting away (having to shoot from inside the cruiser), and more importantly, i can't disprove anything about his version of the events.... I'm not sure how it would be justice to go ahead with a trial that had 0% chance of winning.

    You haven't shed a single tear for Dillon Taylor though. Nobody has, and he never touched the police officer who shot him. Is it better when a black cop shoots a white guy? It shouldn't be, but that guy had a past. He also had headphones and made a sudden movement. He's dead now. He didn't grab the cop, punch him, cuss him out, grab his gun, get shot at, come back at the cop, and get shot (Mike brown did this). He didn't comply with instruction, wearing headphones, he may not have heard it. Then he made a movement that looked like he was bringing out a weapon. He was unarmed, and actually might have just been pulling up his pants. He is dead though, and all America cares about is Mike "the mauler" Brown who got seriously high on some good blunt, and tried getting physical with one too many people.

    It's sad to me. There are more worthy cases that deserve protest.

    11/30/2014 12:32 am


    Well said, guys. Sorry, Artie, but I just can't see your side on this one. Our local free paper ran a piece that ended with the line "Michael Brown was shot to death for walking down the middle of the street". I thought that was anarchist bullshit and still do.
    Edit: I think one big reason this is so polarizing is the way so many of the "activists" are acting and how little light is shone on the more radical elements like the ones who chained the mall doors shut in Seattle on Friday, trapping shoppers inside. And the NYT reporter who published Wilson's home address. Sympathy takes a back seat when looters, opportunists, anarchists, and lynch mobs are given equal footing with those who truly want to see justice served.

    11/29/2014 10:54 am

    " I think we've exhausted all sides of the discussion here."


    ¤Other than the fact the Titanic ended up at the bottom of the ocean, it was a successful voyage.

    ▪and he may have to move to another community, but at least he's still above ground and breathing.

    ▪Really? Wilson, who is living and breathing, is the victim, as opposed to the dead man?

    ▪The bottom line is a young man who was unarmed was shot to death by a police officer, and according to the system, the person who is responsible is the dead kid. Now, tell me again what part is absurd?

    ▪I guarantee he won't make the same mistakes again. 

    ▪but he didn't deserve to die because he stole a handful of cigars and wouldn't walk on a sidewalk.

    ▪At least he still has one to live. Unlike Mr. Brown.

    ▪Oh, I don't know. The dead body? 

    You have not discussed it.  If you refuse to that isfine.  However it isnt fair to say one side is wrong and not be able to say why.  Simply stating you disagree with the end result over and over does not mean you discussed the issue.  This is what the brown side has done.  They call for change and how unfair this was but get stuck on the same points you have.  Yes brown is dead and he didnt have a gun.  That isnt the whole story.  If the brown side cant understand that then neither side can have a discussion and neither side will.  It is impossible.  Anything the wilson side says is over ruled by, "brown is dead".  If anyone actually thinks that is the point that wins this debate the debate itself is pointless.

    Board footera

     

    Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

    Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]