Offline
No one is going to take Westbrook. They're just going to have to hope he pitches like 2010 and not 2011.
Lohse is another story. He's coming off of a good year in which he led the team in wins and had a decent ERA. He has full no-trade protection, and we'd probably still have to pick up some of his contract, but there's a possibility you could move Lohse.
Offline
P-D Thoughts on Furcal's value
Offline
The question is why we would want to move Lohse if we would have to pay to get rid of him. With Wainright back, Lohse and Westbrook will make awesome 4 and 5 pitchers. Plus the can still give some starts to Kmac. Leave the rotation alone and concentrate on the middle infield, then a LHP, then the bench, and get 'right-sized' options for all those as they become available, without waiting around for Pujols.
Offline
"The question is why we would want to move Lohse if we would have to pay to get rid of him."
It sort of comes down to whether you believe he can repeat.
If yes, you probably keep him. If not, then let's say you can move him, but you have to pay $4M. You save $8M, you get something in return and you replace him in the rotation with a better pitcher. That's win-win-win (if you guess right).
Put it differently, if we could have traded Franklin before the season, but had to pay the other team half his salary, but got a prospect in return, wouldn't that have been OK? Franklin was good in 2010, but sucked last year. If you think 2012 Lohse is 2011 Franklin, then you make the move.
Offline
It depends on how much we think we can save, I suppose. If some other team will pay as much as $8 million of his contract, then that is enough money to sign another broken down middle of order starter: someone not quite in the same ballpark as Westbrook last year. Not sure if that 's the route we want to go, but last year several bets on Freddy Garcia-type pitchers paid off.
Offline
Free Agents I'm interested in.
Albert Pujols -- duh!
Ryan Madson -- I really like this guy, he can setup or save, having him and Motte would mean that almost any lead in the 8th is a win.
We need a SS, the three I would look at are --Jimmy Rollins/Jose Reyes/Rafael Furcal
I wish there was some damned news on AP, sucks not hearing anything.
Offline
The only way I would move a pitcher is if they plan on signing a better one.
Offline
"I wish there was some damned news on AP, sucks not hearing anything."
Deep breaths Alz. He didn't come this far to sign quickly. Nothing will happen until the manager is in place, and I doubt anything happens before the Winter meetings which are usually mid-December.
Any news you here at this point is simply going to be speculation from "unnamed sources." You'll make youself crazy listening to that nonsense. Take it from a Mizzou fan who has been waiting for an official announcement that Mizzou is in the SEC, you'll be better ignoring the rumor ans speculation and simply waiting for the official announcement.
Offline
I would assume they're going in to '12 with the idea the rotation is set. I don't think you get Pujols AND Reyes. You might be able to land Reyes if Pujols signs elsewhere. I'm not all that interested in Rollins. He strikes me as one of those guys you'd be paying more for past performance.
Madson is interesting. I don't know if he wants to be a closer. In either event, I'd hope there's some kind of fallback in case Motte can't handle the job. Which makes it even more mystifying why they didn't pick up Dotel's option.
Offline
If it comes down to it, I would think that Cards have more tradable chits with MLB experience this year than they have had in quite a while. We don't need to make trades to shape this team: just resign the guys we have and with the addition of Wainwright we are the favorites. But Moz has the option to consider trades.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
I'd hope there's some kind of fallback in case Motte can't handle the job. Which makes it even more mystifying why they didn't pick up Dotel's option.
After the performance he made down the stretch--throwing the final pitch in the World Series and all, and with arms like Salas and Sanchez already in the mix, I would think that finding a Plan D for closer is pretty far down the list, slightly lower than a back-up for Pujols in the event he resigns but then flounders, but higher than other contingencies such as, 'what if Carp breaks down midseason?'
Last edited by Max (11/03/2011 10:45 am)
Offline
"After the performance he made down the stretch--throwing the final pitch in the World Series and all, and with arms like Salas and Sanchez already in the mix, I would think that finding a Plan D for closer is pretty far down the list, slightly lower than a back-up for Pujols in the event he resigns but then flounders, but higher than other contingencies such as, 'what if Carp breaks down midseason?'"
Snide commentary aside, I would hope that's not the mentality, considering none of those three guys has been a closer for an entire season.
As the Cardinals found out this season, a broken bullpen is a costly thing to fix.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
Snide commentary aside
One of my students said to me, "You can be really sarcastic, Dr. Tuindoh, but even so it is obvious that you are holding back sometimes, and that can be worse than letting it all out. I want to know what young Max was like."
I guess it's just one of those mornings . . .
Offline
With the addition of Wain-o, we can handle a Westbrook. I expect Garcia to continue to grow up, Lohse is serviceable, and Carpenter is apparently immortal.
I'm okay with our rotation. Our bullpen isn't awful, but another strong presence would do us wonders (Madson).
I don't think you can get Pujols and Reyes, but unless we plan on teaching Descalso to play SS, we're going to need to go get one, and the best options out there are Reyes/Rollins/Furcal. I'd hope for someone with a bat that's better than Furcal and defense that's better than Theriot, but it depends on the money we have.
Offline
Max wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
Snide commentary aside
One of my students said to me, "You can be really sarcastic, Dr. Tuindoh, but even so it is obvious that you are holding back sometimes, and that can be worse than letting it all out. I want to know what young Max was like."
I guess it's just one of those mornings . . .
I was snidely commenting myself. Not to be confused with Snidely Whiplash, of course.
Offline
"unless we plan on teaching Descalso to play SS,"
I certainly think that's occurred to them, and he did play there in a pinch a couple of times, maybe even once in the WS when they took Furcal out.
The point was made in the article (Bernie's, I think) that the Cardinals depend on 140 starts from Furcal at their own peril, both from an injury perspective and even if he doesn't get hurt how much he'll wear down over the course of the season.
Again, I hope one of the lessons they've learned is the value of defense at shortstop. It's fine to teach Brendan Ryan a lesson for bad behavior by sending him off into baseball oblivion, but if you're going to have those types of standards, you'd better have a plan that doesn't rely on the likes of Ryan Theriot as your everyday shortstop.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
No one is going to take Westbrook. They're just going to have to hope he pitches like 2010 and not 2011.
Lohse is another story. He's coming off of a good year in which he led the team in wins and had a decent ERA. He has full no-trade protection, and we'd probably still have to pick up some of his contract, but there's a possibility you could move Lohse.
What happened to Lohse in the playoffs?! I'm not so knowledgeable about trades etc. but is it at all possible to offer Lohse to the Rockies for Tulowitzki?
Offline
Only in our dreams.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
Only in our dreams.
Yeah - they'd probably tar & feather the management if they did that in Denver
Offline
Webstergrovesalum wrote:
possible to offer Lohse to the Rockies for Tulowitzki?
more possible than offering Lohse to the Red Sox for Ted Williams, or to the Yankees for the Bambino, but no more probable to have the offer accepted.
Last edited by Max (11/03/2011 12:30 pm)
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
"promote Guillen to Manager"
Please tell me this was a typo
It was my thought at the time, I thought Pujols would stay with Guillen, but not without him. I was probably mis-informed when I heard that.
Offline
alz wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
"promote Guillen to Manager"
Please tell me this was a typoIt was my thought at the time, I thought Pujols would stay with Guillen, but not without him. I was probably mis-informed when I heard that.
I hope you were thinking Oquendo and not Ozzie Guillen.
Offline
I would rather see Zambrono on the mound then Guillen in te dugout. In fact Guillen as manager would turn me off more then Pujols not being resigned.
Offline
"I would rather see Zambrono on the mound"
I wonder who's going to end up with that putz. You know there's one manager out there who thinks "I can get through to him ..."
I hope it's the Reds.
Last edited by artie_fufkin (11/03/2011 7:54 pm)
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
alz wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
"promote Guillen to Manager"
Please tell me this was a typoIt was my thought at the time, I thought Pujols would stay with Guillen, but not without him. I was probably mis-informed when I heard that.
I hope you were thinking Oquendo and not Ozzie Guillen.
wow..... just wow. HAHAHAHAHA I'm a complete idiot, yes I meant Oquendo. I didn't catch that I wrote Guillen, either time.
Thanks!