You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/09/2012 10:03 am  #1


Here we go

Strauss reporting that Carpenter has left camp to have a persistent neck issue evaluated.

 

3/09/2012 11:28 am  #2


Re: Here we go

Seems like they expected this year to be an injury issue for him.  I wonder if they will jump on the chance to get Oswalt in camp early.

 

3/09/2012 11:56 am  #3


Re: Here we go

"I wonder if they will jump on the chance to get Oswalt in camp early."

No (at least according to Strauss)

     Thread Starter
 

3/09/2012 12:58 pm  #4


Re: Here we go

I dnt like haring about a neck issue.  Life suck when your neck hurts.

 

3/11/2012 10:55 am  #5


Re: Here we go

Carpenter supposedly has only a bulging disc, not nerve damage.

I only wish I could believe the Cardinals medical staff.

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/carpenter-s-diagnosis-a-big-relief/article_59bfecee-cf5c-526d-8c0b-173a075f52ea.html

     Thread Starter
 

3/12/2012 11:18 am  #6


Re: Here we go

Without a healthy Carp and Wainwright this team is very normal.  Last season the a trade was needed to fix the starting rotation.  IDK why the Cardinals would think 2012 will be different if this is more then a speedbump for Carp.

 

3/12/2012 11:37 am  #7


Re: Here we go

I've been pretty unimpressed with the front-office savvy to this point.

- Pujols could have been signed for far less if St. Louis ponied up earlier. It didn't happen, pissed him off, and he walked for a quarter-billion.
- Molina (though not grossly) was probably overpaid.
- 13 milion a season for Beltran, 6.5 Million a season for Furcal. No bite on Madson who went at 1/yr 6 million (2nd year 11 million, with a 2.5M buyout, so 2/17), to the Reds...
- No bite on Oswalt
- Still stuck with Westbrook
- Still stuck with Lohse
- Hired Matheny instead of a proven Francona

I'm not saying that all of these moves are disasterous, but when you add them up, they leave you with a really nasty taste in your mouth. If all of these moves prove wrong, we could be competing for 4th place in the Central, and nowhere near playoff anything...

 

3/12/2012 9:36 pm  #8


 

3/13/2012 7:55 am  #9


Re: Here we go

Not a fan of switching Lynn to starting.  He isnt proven but was impressive as a starter.  The PD had an interview with him in which he stated that he just let it go when pitching out of a bullpen.  He said he wouldnt worry about saving himself of stretching himself out.  That is why he was effective.  To make him a starter seems to go against what made him good.


And why isnt McCellan thier 6th starter?  He didnt do that bad last year.  I would expect Lynn to be about the same as McCellan was.

Last edited by APRTW (3/13/2012 7:56 am)

 

3/13/2012 8:01 am  #10


Re: Here we go

I have no idea about McClellan... Only thing I heard was there's no financial downside to Lynn starting, even though he's almost certainly better out of the pen, but only marginally better as a starter than McClellan. However, Kyle has some wording in his arbitration contract about a bonus based on either games started or innings pitched.

I'd love someone to confirm, this was off 590 the Fan, and they seem kinda hoos sometimes.

 

3/13/2012 8:05 am  #11


Re: Here we go

alz wrote:

I have no idea about McClellan... Only thing I heard was there's no financial downside to Lynn starting, even though he's almost certainly better out of the pen, but only marginally better as a starter than McClellan. However, Kyle has some wording in his arbitration contract about a bonus based on either games started or innings pitched.

I'd love someone to confirm, this was off 590 the Fan, and they seem kinda hoos sometimes.

I would think some benifit to starting McCellan would be trade value.  If they can convice another team that he is a MLB starter maybe someone will bit.  Either the Cardinals are asking to much or other teams are not impressed with his career numbers.

 

3/13/2012 8:12 am  #12


Re: Here we go

alz wrote:

No bite on Madson who went at 1/yr 6 million (2nd year 11 million, with a 2.5M buyout, so 2/17), to the Reds...

Those moves I also question why the Cardinals were not involved.  Id throw Kerry Wood who tossed around the idea of pitching outside CHC when the Cubs seems uninterested and Lidge who settled for 1 million into the mix of guys they missed.  I know they like the bullpen mostly because of how they handled there workload in the postseason.  I remember in 2006 when most thought Tyler Johnson and Josh Kinney could be solid parts of the bullpen after a good post season.  That proved to be false.

 

3/13/2012 9:46 am  #13


Re: Here we go

"However, Kyle has some wording in his arbitration contract about a bonus based on either games started or innings pitched."

Key-rist, they saved ~$20 million by letting Pujols walk. You'd think they wouldn't have to base a decision about a potential replacement for Carpenter on the nickels and dimes they might owe McClellan if he's the fifth starter.

 

3/13/2012 9:51 am  #14


Re: Here we go

"I remember in 2006 when most thought Tyler Johnson and Josh Kinney could be solid parts of the bullpen after a good post season.  That proved to be false."

I'm still not sold on their bullpen, and it gets weaker if they have to move Lynn to a starter's role. Motte was the unofficial closer for about two months. Sanchez has closer's stuff but he's pitched what, 30 innings in the majors? Scrabble wasn't great until the playoffs, Romero's skills have diminished and for whatever reason they opted not to re-sign Dotel, who was their best set-up guy after he was acquired.
Their bullpen has the potential to be very good. It also has the potential to be a redux of the first four months of last season, and I don't want them to trade Miller or one of the other prospects to shore it up this time around.

Last edited by artie_fufkin (3/13/2012 9:51 am)

 

3/13/2012 11:23 am  #15


Re: Here we go

artie_fufkin wrote:

"However, Kyle has some wording in his arbitration contract about a bonus based on either games started or innings pitched."

Key-rist, they saved ~$20 million by letting Pujols walk. You'd think they wouldn't have to base a decision about a potential replacement for Carpenter on the nickels and dimes they might owe McClellan if he's the fifth starter.

That's actually a pretty fair point. It might have something to do with front office irritation lingering from last year and the discussion about him wanting to shut it down so he didn't screw up really good numbers for arbitration. I have no idea if that's true or not, just the discussion in here for why he was in the shit-house. If that was true however, I would probably carry a grudge.

 

3/13/2012 12:09 pm  #16


Re: Here we go

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Their bullpen has the potential to be very good. It also has the potential to be a redux of the first four months of last season, and I don't want them to trade Miller or one of the other prospects to shore it up this time around.

I can see it being fine but if things start to fall apart I could see it crashing.  Having someone around that has been around alittle long might have been usefull.

 

3/13/2012 12:12 pm  #17


Re: Here we go

alz wrote:

That's actually a pretty fair point. It might have something to do with front office irritation lingering from last year and the discussion about him wanting to shut it down so he didn't screw up really good numbers for arbitration. I have no idea if that's true or not, just the discussion in here for why he was in the shit-house. If that was true however, I would probably carry a grudge.

I think it shows that they are really sick of McCellan.  With Duncan gone he has no backers.  Maybe they didnt like the offers they were getting at the end of the offseason and decided to hold on to him and see if his value increased over ST.

 

3/14/2012 11:37 am  #18


Re: Here we go

Berkman takes cortisone injection to right knee. Out today, tomorrow. ---Strauss

 

3/14/2012 12:15 pm  #19


Re: Here we go

don.rob11 wrote:

Berkman takes cortisone injection to right knee. Out today, tomorrow. ---Strauss

Pissa. All four old guys have already missed time due to injuries and the real games don't start for another three weeks. If Alex Cora is in the opening day lineup, I'm going to scream.

 

3/21/2012 9:03 am  #20


Re: Here we go

Per Strauss--Carpenter headed back to St. Louis to see same group of docs who saw him during 2008 nerve problem. 2012 season in jeopardy.

     Thread Starter
 

3/21/2012 9:15 am  #21


Re: Here we go

fuck........ It would sure be nice to have Wain-o and Carp at the same damned time...

Well, fuck it. Go Blues!

 

3/21/2012 10:04 am  #22


Re: Here we go

forsberg_us wrote:

Per Strauss--Carpenter headed back to St. Louis to see same group of docs who saw him during 2008 nerve problem. 2012 season in jeopardy.

Really discouraging.........

 

3/21/2012 10:42 am  #23


Re: Here we go

Like I said a week ago....Call Roy Oswalt.

 

3/21/2012 11:18 am  #24


Re: Here we go

Shoulda called Buehrle too. He's been dying to play here from day 1, and it doesn't seem like our front office ever decided to inquire about that. I would think we could have gotten a value price for him.

 

3/21/2012 11:31 am  #25


Re: Here we go

forsberg_us wrote:

Per Strauss--Carpenter headed back to St. Louis to see same group of docs who saw him during 2008 nerve problem. 2012 season in jeopardy.

Aw crap.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]