You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



11/30/2010 2:32 pm  #26


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

forsberg_us wrote:

Webstergrovesalum wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:


Maybe Web, but in that last sentence alone you posted 3 conditions to this being a smart move: 1) if he stays healthy, 2) if he keeps hitting and 3) if he keeps playing defense.

From what I've read, Tulowitzki was owed about $40M over the next 4 seasons, essentially making this new deal a 6 year, $120M extension.  Assume Tulowitzki does everything expected of him over the next 4 seasons.  How much more than 6/$120M would it take to sign him?

Seems awfully risky.

Perhaps, but I wonder if he could have gotten that kind of money elsewhere?  There are teams begging for a good shortstop & who knows what they might have offered.  Not that I'm encouraging this sort of thing  (nervous)

Understood, but they wouldn't have had to let it reach that point.  Tulo is signed through 2013 with a team option for 2014.  They let him play through 2013, exercise the option and then approach him and offer 6/$120M.  Even if you assume his value has gone up a bit, how much would it realistically go up?  6/$140M??  6/$150M??  I'm not sure anyone outside of Colorado would be willing to pay that kind of money for someone who hasn't played home games outside of Coors, and even if it did, isn't it worth the extra $20-30M to get 3 more seasons to assess the player in whom you're making this kind of investment.

I don't think he will, but what if he posts more seasons like 2008?

If he posts more seasons like that there will be a ton of screaming from the Rockies fans!  I'd be surprised if that happened though because he's a really driven player who's constantly looking to improve.  Then again there's his quad problem that pops up occasionally (errr) I guess we shall see.  He's fun to watch when he's on top of his game (happy)

I really need to figure out a way to see more Cardinal games.  I suppose I may have to subscribe to MLB

 

11/30/2010 3:17 pm  #27


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Like Fors has said, this seems totally unnecessary.

     Thread Starter
 

11/30/2010 4:30 pm  #28


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

APRTW wrote:

Like Fors has said, this seems totally unnecessary.

It sounds like they have agreed to pay him $20 million per year for 6 years, starting 4 years from now.  That doesn't sound like a smart business decision unless the rockies are gambling that salaries are going to go WAY up.  That might have been a smart gamble at the beginning of the last decade, but i'm not so sure about this one.

 

12/02/2010 6:05 pm  #30


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Looks like Adam Dunn finally made it to a league that can properly utilize his defensive talents

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=5875860

Is it just me or does this contract even further underscore the ridiculous nature of the Ryan Howard deal.  Compare their average season

(avg./OBP/Slg/HR/RBI

Dunn- .250/.381/.521/40/98
Howard- .279/.372/.572/47/138

Howard's numbers are definitely better, but are they really $11M/year better?

 

12/02/2010 6:16 pm  #31


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Holy crap, now I'm Scott Spiezio. 

Why do I suddenly have an itching sensation in my crotch and a strange desire to try to score some meth?

 

12/02/2010 10:47 pm  #32


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

forsberg_us wrote:

Looks like Adam Dunn finally made it to a league that can properly utilize his defensive talents

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=5875860

Is it just me or does this contract even further underscore the ridiculous nature of the Ryan Howard deal.  Compare their average season

(avg./OBP/Slg/HR/RBI

Dunn- .250/.381/.521/40/98
Howard- .279/.372/.572/47/138

Howard's numbers are definitely better, but are they really $11M/year better?

It's not just you.  Age may also be a factor but I don't think it's nearly that important.  It's not like either one of them is going to dislocate a shoulder diving for a line drive and they both are asking a lot more of their legs than any two limbs should have to cope with.

And congratulations on achieving Spiezio.  If you can live up to it, it'll make the family proud and your friends regular car wash clients.

 

12/04/2010 12:57 pm  #33


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

This morning I have read Strauss on P-D and  Lyle Spencer from MLB.com on Hot Stove league and a Monday morning quarterback thought occurred to me . . .

For the past few years the Cardinals parsimonious payroll has been defended along the lines of the Cards were saving their money for the best opportunity, a strategy that allowed them to land Holliday and still have enough flexibility to have a shot at resigning Pujols.  So here's my thought, did Mozeliak pull the trigger too soon?  What if, instead of going after Holliday, we had kept our powder dry and were now in a serious position to go after Carl Crawford and thought about batting him 2nd? 

It would have been a completely different type of move, but I wonder what would have scored more runs on offense (we know which would have saved more runs in the outfield)?  A lefty with speed who hits for power and average right in front of Pujols, or a righty without speed, who hits with a little more power and a little higher average right after Pujols?

 

12/04/2010 2:15 pm  #34


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

"So here's my thought, did Mozeliak pull the trigger too soon?  What if, instead of going after Holliday, we had kept our powder dry and were now in a serious position to go after Carl Crawford and thought about batting him 2nd?"

Interesting point, Max, and as you say Crawford is an entirely different type of player. The question is whether you want to have a table-setter in front Pujols, or a big bat behind him. Either way, you can't really go wrong with either Crawford or Holliday.
I'm reasonably certain if someone asked Mo, he'd probably say something about the way Holliday flourished here after the acquired him in 2009 being a factor in why they decided to retain him rather than wait a year and take a relative gamble - though a slight one - that Crawford might not be as good a fit in St. Louis.

Last edited by artie_fufkin (12/04/2010 2:15 pm)

 

12/04/2010 2:31 pm  #35


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

It would have been a completely different type of move, but I wonder what would have scored more runs on offense

Better hitters at second base, shortstop, third base and catcher.

 

12/04/2010 2:56 pm  #36


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

tkihshbt wrote:

It would have been a completely different type of move, but I wonder what would have scored more runs on offense

Better hitters at second base, shortstop, third base and catcher.

That's a good example of the difference between choosing between A and B, and choosing between the current situation and the ideal situation.

By the way, I noticed in the Strauss piece a subtle dig by Duncan at the idea that the back-up catcher could be an offensive threat at the expense of defense, something about the pitchers who would be the first to complain.

 

12/04/2010 2:59 pm  #37


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

artie_fufkin wrote:

"So here's my thought, did Mozeliak pull the trigger too soon?  What if, instead of going after Holliday, we had kept our powder dry and were now in a serious position to go after Carl Crawford and thought about batting him 2nd?"

Interesting point, Max, and as you say Crawford is an entirely different type of player. The question is whether you want to have a table-setter in front Pujols, or a big bat behind him. Either way, you can't really go wrong with either Crawford or Holliday.
I'm reasonably certain if someone asked Mo, he'd probably say something about the way Holliday flourished here after the acquired him in 2009 being a factor in why they decided to retain him rather than wait a year and take a relative gamble - though a slight one - that Crawford might not be as good a fit in St. Louis.

If they had set their eyes on Crawford, 2010, from the outset, presumably they never would have traded for Holliday.  He sounds like a great guy to have on a team.

 

12/11/2010 12:00 pm  #38


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

George Sherrill went to the Braves for 1.2 mill.  That would have been a hell of a deal.  He throws left handed and has closed.  He might be coming off a bad year but would have been worth a roll of the dice.

     Thread Starter
 

12/11/2010 7:37 pm  #39


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

APRTW wrote:

George Sherrill went to the Braves for 1.2 mill.  That would have been a hell of a deal.  He throws left handed and has closed.  He might be coming off a bad year but would have been worth a roll of the dice.

Give credit to Moz for this, if nothing else, he secured Holliday as a Cardinal for a long time.  If Holliday had been on the market this year, I think he might have been worthy of something like $175 million / 7 years.  In most ways, Holliday is a cut about of Werth and Crawford.  And truthfully, there was a large measure of luck in Holliday hitting the market at its lowest ebb.  Other than that, I haven't really seen any of Moz's other moves as showing much skill or creativity at his job.

 

12/11/2010 9:42 pm  #40


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Angels get Downs for 3/$15.

 

12/16/2010 1:21 pm  #41


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Rumor is  Edgar Renteria has an offer from the Gaints for 1 million but is more serious about going back to the Marlins.

     Thread Starter
 

12/17/2010 8:48 am  #42


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

I hope everyone saw that Kerry Wood is back with the Cubs.

     Thread Starter
 

12/17/2010 10:14 am  #43


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

APRTW wrote:

I hope everyone saw that Kerry Wood is back with the Cubs.

I did. He pitched well last year. And Mark Prior signed with the Yankees. He didn't pitch well last year.

 

12/17/2010 10:18 am  #44


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

APRTW wrote:

I hope everyone saw that Kerry Wood is back with the Cubs.

Well, I assumed that seismic shift that just shook the NL Central was SOMETHING.

I wonder how Mozeliak plans to respond to THIS?

Last edited by Max (12/17/2010 12:18 pm)

 

12/17/2010 11:24 am  #45


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

I believe Wood signed for 1 million and some change.  That is a good deal.

     Thread Starter
 

12/17/2010 12:41 pm  #46


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Agree on the Wood deal.  For a little over a million, I wouldn't have minded seeing him in a Cardinal uniform.  Someone with closing experience in case/when Franklin falters.

 

12/17/2010 10:53 pm  #47


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

forsberg_us wrote:

Agree on the Wood deal.  For a little over a million, I wouldn't have minded seeing him in a Cardinal uniform.  Someone with closing experience in case/when Franklin falters.

We could have had some fun suggesting to CubFan that if he had signed with the Cardinals, he could have picked an STL cap for his plaque in the Hall of Fame.
But I haven't even read the Cubs' board in about a month, not since it completely turned into a gay bar.

 

1/04/2011 11:01 am  #48


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Chris Capuano to the Mets for 1.5million.  That might not have been a bad deal for the Cardinals. 

Arthur Rhodes got a 4 million dollar deal for the Rangers plus a 2012 4 million option.  WOW!
They also gave Brandon Webb a one year 3 million dollar deal.  That is fair, IMO.

Brad hawpe got a 3 million dollar deal to play first for the Padres.  I like to have seen the Cardinal take a chance on him.  However I find it wierd to pay him 3 million to play first.

     Thread Starter
 

1/04/2011 11:37 am  #49


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

APRTW wrote:

Chris Capuano to the Mets for 1.5million.  That might not have been a bad deal for the Cardinals. 

Arthur Rhodes got a 4 million dollar deal for the Rangers plus a 2012 4 million option.  WOW!
They also gave Brandon Webb a one year 3 million dollar deal.  That is fair, IMO.

Brad hawpe got a 3 million dollar deal to play first for the Padres.  I like to have seen the Cardinal take a chance on him.  However I find it wierd to pay him 3 million to play first.

I read somewhere the Pads want Hawpe to play first base. Maybe if he works out this year, the Cardinals can sign him to replace Pujols in 2012.

 

1/04/2011 11:41 am  #50


Re: Elsewhere in the MLB

Sorry to see Hawpe with the Padres.  He can really hit when he's "on".  How about that deal given to Carlos Gonzales by The Rockies? It's a seven year 80 million dollar deal!  Pending a physical exam of course but wow!  Who would have thought that the Rockies management would spring for sooooo much money for two players? He & Tulo have become good friends & they better live up to the expected potential or the fan base will turn.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]