You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



11/06/2013 10:40 am  #26


Re: Offseason thread

 

11/06/2013 11:05 am  #27


Re: Offseason thread

artie_fufkin wrote:

MM reports another team is in on Beltran:

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2013/11/6/5072420/carlos-beltran-mlb-free-agent-rumors

Interesting. Seems he really would like to stay, but it probably isn't in the cards.

 

11/06/2013 11:17 am  #28


Re: Offseason thread

Beltran's overall numbers were very good, but he was streaky. At this point, I think the Cardinals are better served with the draft pick, although it wouldn't be a disaster if he came back for 1 year. I wouldn't give him multiple years though.

 

11/06/2013 11:41 am  #29


Re: Offseason thread

forsberg_us wrote:

Beltran's overall numbers were very good, but he was streaky. At this point, I think the Cardinals are better served with the draft pick, although it wouldn't be a disaster if he came back for 1 year. I wouldn't give him multiple years though.

 
I might give him two, but I think he's looking for three (ain't that always the way it goes?). I'd consider offering him 2 with a potential option for the 3rd year, but that's the absolute longest I would consider.

Doing this allows you to either run Tavarez in CF, Beltran in RF, and Craig at 1B --or-- Beltran in CF, Craig in RF, and Adams at 1B while you develop Tavarez.

I don't see us being able to get equal production from the 15 million we're going to need to give Beltran on the free agent market, so the alternative is a trade likely involving Lynn/Miller and I'm simply not okay with losing Miller unless it's a phenomenal deal.

There's plenty of time though, I'm not totally sure what all is even available.
 

 

11/06/2013 12:07 pm  #30


Re: Offseason thread

"Doing this allows you to either run Tavarez in CF, Beltran in RF, and Craig at 1B --or-- Beltran in CF, Craig in RF, and Adams at 1B while you develop Tavarez."

Everything I've read indicates Taveras isn't a centerfielder, and I can't see Beltran playing center anymore either, so we're probably looking at a scenario again where Jay is the primary centerfielder with Robinson seeing some playing time when the other team starts a lefty.
There are some free agent options like Ellsbury or Granderson who would be expensive and haven't shown a lot of durability. Coco Crisp might have been a cheaper alternative, but the A's picked up his option.
If the Cardinals want to be truly adventurous, Nyjer Morgan is coming off a .294/11/50 season in Japan. Anyone for T. Plush wearing Birds on the Bat?

 

11/06/2013 12:12 pm  #31


Re: Offseason thread

forsberg_us wrote:

Beltran's overall numbers were very good, but he was streaky. At this point, I think the Cardinals are better served with the draft pick, although it wouldn't be a disaster if he came back for 1 year. I wouldn't give him multiple years though.

 

Likely but i think you could put a hell of a team together with holliday, betran, craig and adams on a 80/20 playing time/rest platoon.  It is to ideal to expect tho.  Beltran and holliday dont take themselfs out of the lineup and MM wont put his foot down.  Beltran might be a great teamamte but i doubt he sign a time share deal.  He might be playing for rings but he is border line hof.  He knows that.  3 years at dh would be the best way for him to boast his number without risk.  He can likely do that with a good team.  I think keeping all 4 of those guys woukd work.  With rest and injuries i doubt there would be a lack of playing time for any of them.  I think holliday and beltran woukd both have the same or better numbers with more rest.  It just isnt the way the mlb works with pay checks and egos invovled.  The fo should be highly focused on bats this winter.  They are going to need a strong bench bat and a guy that can play corner outfield and possibly first base.  And defense is going to suck again in 2014.  No way around it.  Holliday, tavares, craig and jay are likely the worst groupmof outfielders in the league.

     Thread Starter
 

11/06/2013 12:20 pm  #32


Re: Offseason thread

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Doing this allows you to either run Tavarez in CF, Beltran in RF, and Craig at 1B --or-- Beltran in CF, Craig in RF, and Adams at 1B while you develop Tavarez."

Everything I've read indicates Taveras isn't a centerfielder, and I can't see Beltran playing center anymore either, so we're probably looking at a scenario again where Jay is the primary centerfielder with Robinson seeing some playing time when the other team starts a lefty.
There are some free agent options like Ellsbury or Granderson who would be expensive and haven't shown a lot of durability. Coco Crisp might have been a cheaper alternative, but the A's picked up his option.
If the Cardinals want to be truly adventurous, Nyjer Morgan is coming off a .294/11/50 season in Japan. Anyone for T. Plush wearing Birds on the Bat?

I think they have every intention of starting tavarez in cf, craig at rf and adams at first.  Adding a real cfer is interesting.  Could be the solution.  Keeps taveras in triple a or in the role of roaming outfielder.  Play him in lf, rf and dabble in cf when needed.  Keep him from being overexposed as well.  If they would set the team up in that manner and add a ss the lineup would be really nice.

Ellbury
Carp
Craig
Holliday
Molina
Adams
New short stop
Wong

Everyone seems in the right spots in that lineup.  Speed and obp at the top.  Carp would be a great second slot hitter imo.  Molina isnt asked to repeat his career year for the team to have success.  Adams isnt thrusted into the middle of the order and wong is deep enough in the lineup that he can hit .250 and not be demoted. 
 

     Thread Starter
 

11/06/2013 12:30 pm  #33


Re: Offseason thread

Ellbury?

 

11/06/2013 1:06 pm  #34


Re: Offseason thread

"starting tavarez in cf"

I looked at Taveras' minor league stats and they indicate he's gotten most of his playing time in center, so I was either mistaken or I've been paying attention to the wrong sources. Probably the former. But he still lost almost the entire '13 season to injury, so it's not another Evan Longoria-esque situation where someone else was keeping a spot warm for him while he stayed in the minors for too long.
What happens in spring training will likely determine where he starts the '14 season, but I hope someone will urge the Cardinals to tread carefully here. The only ways a can't miss prospect can miss are injury or being rushed too soon. Let's not hope the latter happens because of the former.

 

11/06/2013 2:09 pm  #35


Re: Offseason thread

No, you're right; he's really not a center fielder. That's where he's played, but there's serious questions if he has the ability to hang there over a full season. 

 

11/06/2013 8:08 pm  #36


Re: Offseason thread

tkihshbt wrote:

No, you're right; he's really not a center fielder. That's where he's played, but there's serious questions if he has the ability to hang there over a full season. 

 
This was the opinion before they even played him at center this year In memphis.  Idk if any of his injury issues were caused by playing a more demanding position.   If he can play the position well enough to spot start him in there i would Early in his career.  However with everything that has been said about him being weak at the position i dont see it as a smart move to make him the everyday cfer.  If he can get 350 to 400 ab spot starting and pinch hitting i like the idea of him being the fourth outfielder.  That is if there is an upgrade at cf.  Im done with jay. Also this would help with bench power.  They have to increase the level of bench players.  Having a 4 outfielder/1b rotation would help alot.

Last edited by APIAD (11/06/2013 8:11 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

11/08/2013 9:58 am  #37


Re: Offseason thread

Boston is apparently coveting Beltran, but I would urge consideration of the source.

http://nypost.com/2013/11/07/red-sox-making-aggressive-push-for-carlos-beltran/

 

11/10/2013 8:18 pm  #38


Re: Offseason thread

Interesting and correct view point here

"With the No. 31 pick in the 2014 draft and a deep farm system, they won't have to worry much about losing a pick by signing a player who has been extended a qualifying offer; they'll also likely be able to replace any draft pick they might lose with the one they'll get if another team signs Beltran.) "

     Thread Starter
 

11/10/2013 10:38 pm  #39


Re: Offseason thread

APIAD wrote:

Interesting and correct view point here

"With the No. 31 pick in the 2014 draft and a deep farm system, they won't have to worry much about losing a pick by signing a player who has been extended a qualifying offer; they'll also likely be able to replace any draft pick they might lose with the one they'll get if another team signs Beltran.) "

And all the better if someone other than Boston signs him. Yankees would work.

 

11/11/2013 9:58 am  #40


Re: Offseason thread

I have the normal offseason rose colored glasses on.  High hopes of the fo addressing ss and cf

     Thread Starter
 

11/11/2013 12:40 pm  #41


Re: Offseason thread

All kinds of rumors about Tulo flying around. Lotsa money and lotsa years for a player who has missed lotsa games.
That's all I'm sayin' ...

 

11/11/2013 1:51 pm  #42


Re: Offseason thread

artie_fufkin wrote:

All kinds of rumors about Tulo flying around. Lotsa money and lotsa years for a player who has missed lotsa games.
That's all I'm sayin' ...

I agree.  I am not a fan.  Plus they would have to give alot.  I am out on drew as well.  He isnt much more then eckein.  My current thinking is that jhonny peralta might come faitly reasonable.  I know he has ped baggage.  That might keep the cards away but that aside he would be a pretty good fit on a 2 year deal.  Then i would go big and try and land the best cfer possible via trade or fa.

     Thread Starter
 

11/11/2013 2:22 pm  #43


Re: Offseason thread

At 45, I'm a better defensive SS than Jhonny Peralta.

I don't have a problem with the Tulowitzki deal if they deal from excess. Offer to take the whole contract, and offer them Adams, Lynn and Siegrist. Throw in a minor league prospect if necessary.

 

11/11/2013 7:03 pm  #44


 

11/11/2013 7:30 pm  #45


Re: Offseason thread

forsberg_us wrote:

At 45, I'm a better defensive SS than Jhonny Peralta.

And your parents didn't name you "Jhonny."
I have three problems with the Tulo deal, as it's been reported. First, if the Rockies are asking for Craig, I'd tell them to go shit in their hat. Second, there's the Coors Field factor. I know it's not as dramatic now that they put the baseballs in the humidor until the ninth inning if they're behind, but I can't think of one player whose numbers have gotten better after he left Denver. Third, Tulo's age and injury history suggest he'll be at a corner infield spot by the time this contract ends. Combine issues #2 and #3 and you're looking at a third baseman who is going to give you .280/20/85, if he can stay on the field. Solid numbers, but worth $20 million? Nah.
I'm with Strauss. J.J. Hardy presents a vastly cheaper option who will give you Gold Glove defense and decent if not spectacular offense. And you won't have to give up Adams, Miller or Siegrist to get him.
 

 

11/11/2013 8:36 pm  #46


Re: Offseason thread

I agree with artie on his thohght of tulo.  I also agree with fors that trades should come from the excess.  Garcia, adams, kelly, lynn, jay, motte and feese should be shopped.  Not miller, martinez, wacha, rosenthal or tavarez.  Id rather carp be traded in a major deal then those 5.  Having to much pitching seems to work itself out. 

Hardy would have to be traded for right?

I let the groups judgement on jhonnys defense stand.  He is an al player.  I know little.

What is the opinion of the cardinals getting in on kemp or either rumors?

     Thread Starter
 

11/11/2013 8:42 pm  #47


Re: Offseason thread

And my opinion of drew stands.  He is going to be wildly overpaid for the player he is.  The cards should steer clear. 

Can granderson still play center?  I am clueless to his value. 

The cards have 30 million to spend and they should attempt to find a wise way to use it.

     Thread Starter
 

11/11/2013 9:03 pm  #48


Re: Offseason thread

"Hardy would have to be traded for right?"

Yes. I think I read he's on the last year of a contract that pays him around $8 million. I think the plan is to move Machado to shortstop. He got hurt last year, so I don't know how that would impact a decision about trading Hardy.

"What is the opinion of the cardinals getting in on kemp or either rumors?"

I've not heard anything about either except the obvious notion Dodgers have four outfielders for three spots. I've never liked Kemp. He's always been whiny and his health is an issue now. Either would fit in well in the clubhouse, but I question whether he can play center full-time, and he does nothing to improve the Cardinals' lineup against left-handed pitching.
And if Either stayed at ASU for one or two more years, the Sun Devils certainly would have won at least one national title. So he's got that to answer for.


 

 

11/11/2013 10:28 pm  #49


Re: Offseason thread

Kemp is more over-paid and injury-prone than Tulowitzki.

I understand the principle that you can never have too much pitching. But it doesn't do you much good to be 8-9 deep in your rotation if you have glaring holes elsewhere. That's where this team is right now, and they should use some of those pitching assets to fix those holes.

 

11/12/2013 9:30 am  #50


Re: Offseason thread

Idk tnat they are really 8 deep in the rotation.  I assume you are counting:
Wainwright
Wacha
Miller
Lynn
Garcia
Martinez
Kelly
Rosenthal

I see alot of ways you could make all those guys work.  First off only waiwright can be counted on for a full season workload.  Wacha, kelly, martinez and rosenthal have never pitch a full mlb season.  Lynn, imo, once again showed signs he is a first half pitcher in that hehad to battle much more in the second half of the season.  Garcia is coming off injury and was pretty flighty in year prior.  Imo there is room for most that allows the younger arms to mature in the pen while providing a backup plan for the rotation when shit hits the yearly fan

Wainwright
Wacha
Miller
Garcia
Lynn

MDL:  kelly
MDL: maness
LR:  choate
LR: siegrist
7th: martinez
8th: rosenthal/motte
9th: rosenthal/motte

That is a strong rotation and bullpen.  If they want offense they should sign a center fielder if a ss isnt available.  I dont want to see miller, martinez, wacha or rosenthal traded.  Garcia, lynn and kelly, in that order, i coukd deal with. 

My arguement against trading is that ur weaking a strong point to strengthening a a weak point.  True the roster get more balanced but does it really get better.  A few injuries happen, which always happens and tyler lyonns is back in the rotation.  The cardinals have the money to sign FA help at center and ss if they wish.  Even drew makes this team better in that regaurd because signing him doesnt subtract a strength.

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]