Offline
Looks like the Stand for Stan efforts worked
Offline
If Obama did it, it must be bad, or so the conservative wisdom goes. Watch for Glenn Beck to go after Musial. Knowing Beck he can probably find a way to say on the air that Stan was helping to send Jews off the incinerator, and then get FOX to back him up.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Looks like the Stand for Stan efforts worked
A prestigious honor for a prestigious human being.
Offline
Max wrote:
If Obama did it, it must be bad, or so the conservative wisdom goes. Watch for Glenn Beck to go after Musial. Knowing Beck he can probably find a way to say on the air that Stan was helping to send Jews off the incinerator, and then get FOX to back him up.
Sometimes your need to put a political spin on everything becomes a bit tiresome.
BTW, Obama certainly owed it to him after monopolizing the pre-game time at an All-Star game that should have focused entirely on Stan and not some run-of-the-mill Chicago pol.
I'm still trying to figure out the Angela Merkle selection. Is Obama tying to show he's on board with the anti-diversity movement, so long as it's in Europe?
Last edited by Mags (11/17/2010 10:42 pm)
Offline
Mags wrote:
Max wrote:
If Obama did it, it must be bad, or so the conservative wisdom goes. Watch for Glenn Beck to go after Musial. Knowing Beck he can probably find a way to say on the air that Stan was helping to send Jews off the incinerator, and then get FOX to back him up.
Sometimes your need to put a political spin on everything becomes a bit tiresome.
BTW, Obama certainly owed it to him after monopolizing the pre-game time at an All-Star game that should have focused entirely on Stan and not some run-of-the-mill Chicago pol.
I'm still trying to figure out the Angela Merkle selection. Is Obama tying to show he's on board with the anti-diversity movement, so long as it's in Europe?
Sometimes a simple rec isn't enough.
I'd like to give 5 stars to each of paragraphs 1 and 2 of that post.
Offline
Mags wrote:
BTW, Obama certainly owed it to him after monopolizing the pre-game time at an All-Star game that should have focused entirely on Stan and not some run-of-the-mill Chicago pol.
I can tell this will be a fun thread.
I'll agree that Max's shot was unnecessary, but this was as far off the mark since All-Star pre-game activities doesn't fall under the authority of the POTUS.
I don't remember the circumstances surrounding what happened last year, but I don't recall anyone outside of St. Louis complaining about Musial's treatment. I know there was hope that the scene would be as good as Williams at Fenway, but there's no chance that will ever happen again. TV time constraints won't allow it.
Offline
"I know there was hope that the scene would be as good as Williams at Fenway, but there's no chance that will ever happen again. TV time constraints won't allow it."
And it would be exceedingly difficult to replicate the Williams event in his present condition.
What do you think Yo Yo Ma's friends say to him when they want to get his attention? "Yo, Yo Yo?"
Offline
Mags wrote:
Max wrote:
If Obama did it, it must be bad, or so the conservative wisdom goes. Watch for Glenn Beck to go after Musial. Knowing Beck he can probably find a way to say on the air that Stan was helping to send Jews off the incinerator, and then get FOX to back him up.
Sometimes your need to put a political spin on everything becomes a bit tiresome.
BTW, Obama certainly owed it to him after monopolizing the pre-game time at an All-Star game that should have focused entirely on Stan and not some run-of-the-mill Chicago pol.
I'm still trying to figure out the Angela Merkle selection. Is Obama tying to show he's on board with the anti-diversity movement, so long as it's in Europe?
Hyperbole aside, I will assume that your intent was "Sometimes your need to put a political spin on some things becomes a bit tiresome."
That's probably true, but I thought this was an appropriate situation to point out how conservatives' stated goals to make Obama fail, and their implicit strategy of being against everything he is for, along with their partnering with grade-A mercantilist buffoons who will say any hateful thing if it makes a buck, leaves a lot of collateral damage. What good is a presidential medal when it comes from a "socialist" who "just has a different belief system than most Americans." Who would accept a medal from such a guy?!?
Last edited by Max (11/18/2010 10:49 am)
Offline
Bernie gets it, even if others apparently don't
"We're a polarized nation in many ways. We dig into our respective corners. Republicans vs. Democrats. Liberals vs. Conservatives. We snarl at each other. We don't seem to agree on much. But we can agree on this: Stan Musial transcends all of that. When it comes to The Man, there are no differences in ideology or opinion. It's unanimous: We love The Man. Even at the late innings of his life, Musial still brings people together and makes them happy."
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
I don't remember the circumstances surrounding what happened last year, but I don't recall anyone outside of St. Louis complaining about Musial's treatment. I know there was hope that the scene would be as good as Williams at Fenway, but there's no chance that will ever happen again. TV time constraints won't allow it.
I doubt anyone outside of St. Louis really even expect that a all star game in St. Louis should have a pregame based around Stan or would put Stan in the top ten as far as baseball players go. He is largely forgoten.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Bernie gets it, even if others apparently don't
I saw that and figured someone would post it if I didn't. In your heart, you probably know that this does not actually mean that baseball transcends politics, but rather that the Rupert Murdochs of this world, henchmen like Roger Ailes, and all their minions, like Beck, see Stan Musial as untouchable, for now. Do you really think for a minute that they would not be calling on Stan, right now, to tell him not to be tarred by Obama's hand, unless they had done the math and calculated they would lose?
Offline
Max wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Bernie gets it, even if others apparently don't
I saw that and figured someone would post it if I didn't. In your heart, you probably know that this does not actually mean that baseball transcends politics, but rather that the Rupert Murdochs of this world, henchmen like Roger Ailes, and all their minions, like Beck, see Stan Musial as untouchable, for now. Do you really think for a minute that they would not be calling on Stan, right now, to tell him not to be tarred by Obama's hand, unless they had done the math and calculated they would lose?
Actually Max, what I know in my heart is that you took a situation that had no political implications whatsoever and turned it into your opportunity to lecture us on your politics. It was stupid then and your attempts to explain yourself aren't helping your case any.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Max wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Bernie gets it, even if others apparently don't
I saw that and figured someone would post it if I didn't. In your heart, you probably know that this does not actually mean that baseball transcends politics, but rather that the Rupert Murdochs of this world, henchmen like Roger Ailes, and all their minions, like Beck, see Stan Musial as untouchable, for now. Do you really think for a minute that they would not be calling on Stan, right now, to tell him not to be tarred by Obama's hand, unless they had done the math and calculated they would lose?
Actually Max, what I know in my heart is that you took a situation that had no political implications whatsoever and turned it into your opportunity to lecture us on your politics. It was stupid then and your attempts to explain yourself aren't helping your case any.
If it had no political implications, then why the Bernie piece explaining that "We're a polarized nation in many ways. We dig into our respective corners. Republicans vs. Democrats. Liberals vs. Conservatives. We snarl at each other. We don't seem to agree on much. But we can agree on this: Stan Musial transcends all of that."?
Offline
Max wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Max wrote:
I saw that and figured someone would post it if I didn't. In your heart, you probably know that this does not actually mean that baseball transcends politics, but rather that the Rupert Murdochs of this world, henchmen like Roger Ailes, and all their minions, like Beck, see Stan Musial as untouchable, for now. Do you really think for a minute that they would not be calling on Stan, right now, to tell him not to be tarred by Obama's hand, unless they had done the math and calculated they would lose?Actually Max, what I know in my heart is that you took a situation that had no political implications whatsoever and turned it into your opportunity to lecture us on your politics. It was stupid then and your attempts to explain yourself aren't helping your case any.
If it had no political implications, then why the Bernie piece explaining that "We're a polarized nation in many ways. We dig into our respective corners. Republicans vs. Democrats. Liberals vs. Conservatives. We snarl at each other. We don't seem to agree on much. But we can agree on this: Stan Musial transcends all of that."?
To point out the obvious to people like you.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Max wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Actually Max, what I know in my heart is that you took a situation that had no political implications whatsoever and turned it into your opportunity to lecture us on your politics. It was stupid then and your attempts to explain yourself aren't helping your case any.If it had no political implications, then why the Bernie piece explaining that "We're a polarized nation in many ways. We dig into our respective corners. Republicans vs. Democrats. Liberals vs. Conservatives. We snarl at each other. We don't seem to agree on much. But we can agree on this: Stan Musial transcends all of that."?
To point out the obvious to people like you.
So, who is lecturing who about politics here? All I did was make a joke, and then explain it. Anytime someone needs to explain a joke it may well be that someone found the joke to be not funny, or in bad taste. I confess I tell bad jokes, with a mean-spirited sarcasm--it's nothing I am necessarily proud of, it's a survival mechanism of the environment I was raised in. But it was a joke, not a lecture. And the joke points out the obvious about people like Palin, Beck, Coulter and other wingnut chickenhawks. They make money off of selling polarizing fear that is bad for America. They sold hatred of Muslims until General Petraeus called them out on it and then they suddenly agreed that needlessly provoking Muslims was a bad idea, because they don't have any real ideology or integrity and are too chicken to take on a guy who does. They sell the idea that everything Obama does is bad, and I am using this opportunity to make a joke about that. Surely you don't disagree that it is a bad thing for the country to disagree with everything Obama does on the principle that if Obama does it, it must be bad. I suspect you and I, and almost everyone on this board agrees with that, even if they don't agree with my sense of humor.
Offline
And weren't there just as many wingnuts who spent the better part of 2005-08 telling us that everything that Bush did/was doing was just as bad? Didn't Michael Moore, Al Gore, Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann and many others make plenty of money by selling off of the exact same sort of polarizing fear, just from a different perspective?
Yes, I agree that it's a bad thing for people to disagree with everything Obama does on the notion that if he did it, it must be bad. What I find humorous is that you had so little problem taking that exact same position with the previous president and seem to be so indignant that others are doing the same thing now. I seem to remember about 3 years of your posts where you (along with Maher, Olbermann, Huffington, Moore, etc...) described the various war crimes/human rights tribunals that would need to be convened after Bush and his administration left office, but now someone is attacking your President and you get all bent about it.
Offline
Well, I am glad that we can agree to agree about politics, once in a while.
But part of your rebuttal seems to be that both sides are doing some bad things and it is hard to say which side is more to blame. To the contrary, Bush had the nation, and world unified behind him after 9-11 and it took a lot of action on his part to turn so many people against him. Bush earned his ignominy in the office of the president. Obama, as with Lincoln, was attacked before he ever took office, with Limbaugh, for example, openly hoping that he would fail.
But there is more that we probably agree on. For example, if you go back to the era of Clinton and Gingrich, even Newt was able to applaud Clinton during the State of the Union address for the things that he agreed with. Yes, there were a lot of ad hominem attacks against Clinton, but when it came to politics, it was not the case that everything Clinton did had to be bad because it came from Clinton. So, as bad as things were then, they are much worse now, and I suspect we both agree with that, too.
During this last election cycle, only one side was talking about "Second Amendment solutions". I know it's hard in a political debate to cast aside your motivated core, because you need every vote you can get, but really, how productive is it to our democracy to discuss "Second Amendment solutions" during an election? We both know we can't have free and fair elections where one side throws threats like that around with impunity. So, there's another thing I think we can agree on.
If you look back on the "three years" you refer to, I think you will discover that the beginnings of that debate was my contention, while living in Muslim-majority country, that it was not helpful for Americans to shout insults at Muslims in other countries, and that a much better approach was to contain the radicals within our own society, a contention for which I was resoundingly ridiculed. But for some reason it never seemed as wise a thing to do when I said it, while my family was living in a complex targeted by suicide bombers, as it did when General Petreaus said that burning the Quran put American soldiers lives at risk. Thank goodness a sensible and credible voice within the conservative establishment called out the chickenhawks for the polarizing brinkmanship artists that they are. We probably agree on that, too, when we consider how bad it would have been if that doofus had made a big deal out of publicly burning the Quran.
So, there, you've done it again. I have begun to lecture on my politics. You are an artist at dragging it out of me, Fors.
Offline
Max,
I don't see a real need or purpose to continuing the debate. There's plenty of blame on both sides of the political aisles to go around regarding the current state of politics.
Suffice to say I felt your need to inject politics into a thread regarding Musial finally receiving an award after several years of people speculating whether or not he would was ill-timed and in extremely poor taste, regardless of your reasons.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Max,
I don't see a real need or purpose to continuing the debate. There's plenty of blame on both sides of the political aisles to go around regarding the current state of politics.
Suffice to say I felt your need to inject politics into a thread regarding Musial finally receiving an award after several years of people speculating whether or not he would was ill-timed and in extremely poor taste, regardless of your reasons.
Thanks, fors. I decided to sit this one out for the day and not even look in on it for fear I might have a momentary lapse and try to post a response that would certainly not have been as restrained and precise as each of yours has been. You've put the matter to rest, so as I'm concerned.
About 45 years ago, I worked in a maintenance department and an aluminum plant to their was particular windbag who was always screaming and throwing a fit about lack of support in order to try to get ahead of others in line for service. My predecessor as dispatcher had moved into another job with less stress because of his series of heart attacks told me one, "Sometimes you just need to say, 'Doc, talk to my ass. My head hurts.' "
I'm not sure I understand it but somehow it conveys the idea perfectly. Afterwords, I used that statement about 3 times a week to make it clear that I wasn't interested anything else that pain in the ass might have to say.
Offline
Mags wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Max,
I don't see a real need or purpose to continuing the debate. There's plenty of blame on both sides of the political aisles to go around regarding the current state of politics.
Suffice to say I felt your need to inject politics into a thread regarding Musial finally receiving an award after several years of people speculating whether or not he would was ill-timed and in extremely poor taste, regardless of your reasons.Thanks, fors. I decided to sit this one out for the day and not even look in on it for fear I might have a momentary lapse and try to post a response that would certainly not have been as restrained and precise as each of yours has been. You've put the matter to rest, so as I'm concerned.
About 45 years ago, I worked in a maintenance department and an aluminum plant to their was particular windbag who was always screaming and throwing a fit about lack of support in order to try to get ahead of others in line for service. My predecessor as dispatcher had moved into another job with less stress because of his series of heart attacks told me one, "Sometimes you just need to say, 'Doc, talk to my ass. My head hurts.' "
I'm not sure I understand it but somehow it conveys the idea perfectly. Afterwords, I used that statement about 3 times a week to make it clear that I wasn't interested anything else that pain in the ass might have to say.
I spent some time looking back over the nearly seven years of posts that survive on the New Message Board. Some of my more contentions points were that I argued that the right side won the Civil War, that the Iraq War and the Bush-Cheney propaganda to sell it to us were mistakes, that the Abu Graib affair was a horrible public relations that turned much of the Muslim world against us, that it was a mistake under all circumstances to equate Islam with terrorism, and that a major danger to ourselves is the unresolved issue of racism. In all that time I don't recall anyone else ever calling me a name. But if I am to be a pain in the ass, then so be it, because my opinions on those issues haven't changed.
Offline
So this thread started about how Stan getting this award wasnt a political statement but then turned into a political thread.
Offline
APRTW wrote:
So this thread started about how Stan getting this award wasnt a political statement but then turned into a political thread.
APRTW,
Once again, I have read and reread fors' intial post and I don't think there was a hint about the subject of politics in any shape, form, or fashion. It seemed to me it was entirely a recognition and celebration of much overdue and still inadequate recognition of one of the very best human beings with whom we've had the good fortune to share this planet
Last edited by Mags (11/19/2010 9:40 pm)
Offline
"But if I am to be a pain in the ass, then so be it"
Don't sweat it, Max. I'm a much bigger pain in the ass than you are.
Offline
Mags wrote:
APRTW wrote:
So this thread started about how Stan getting this award wasnt a political statement but then turned into a political thread.
APRTW,
Once again, I have read and reread fors' intial post and I don't think there was a hint about the subject of politics in any shape, form, or fashion. It seemed to me it was entirely a recognition and celebration of much overdue and still inadequate recognition of one of the very best human beings with whom we've had the good fortune to share this planet
Oh I agree that the first post wasnt what ruined this thread.
Offline
APRTW wrote:
Oh I agree that the first post wasnt what ruined this thread.
And I have to accept a large part of the blame for not being able to let what I saw as a transgression pass without comment.