You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/12/2014 3:40 pm  #26


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I'm assuming Rosenthal is the closer all year.  Or, stated differently, it's his until he loses it.

And since all injury updates are coming from the Cardinals, I'm also assuming Motte will have his right arm amputated before he ever pitches again.

 

3/12/2014 5:06 pm  #27


Re: Spring Training intrigue

Wallace was released by houston.

 

3/12/2014 5:08 pm  #28


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I wonder what being demoted to setup guy through no fault of his own is going to do to Motte's psyche.
Going by Kelly's history, there had better be a far better option in the rotation - whether it's Lynn or Martinez - before they move Kelly to the bullpen. He's a useful fifth starter, but he's almost completely wasted in relief.
These aren't bad problems to have, though. It wasn't too long ago that the Cardinals were touting Kip Freakin' Wells as their second starter.

 

3/12/2014 5:53 pm  #29


Re: Spring Training intrigue

APIAD wrote:

Wallace was released by houston.

His greatness isn't being fully recognized.

     Thread Starter
 

3/12/2014 9:13 pm  #30


Re: Spring Training intrigue

forsberg_us wrote:

APIAD wrote:

Wallace was released by houston.

His greatness isn't being fully recognized.

It's still a bad trade. Holliday can't hit in the clutch.

Last edited by artie_fufkin (3/12/2014 9:13 pm)

 

3/13/2014 7:26 am  #31


Re: Spring Training intrigue

Being released by houston is like being dumped by a fat girl.  It has to sting.

 

3/13/2014 8:34 am  #32


Re: Spring Training intrigue

There's no way of telling who is going to get the no. 5 job. Kelly has the track record, albeit on smoke-and-mirrors, but he's been bad this spring. Martinez has an electric arm and is doing everything right. I guess it depends on if they feel Martinez is ready to make the leap to 150 innings.

 

3/13/2014 9:30 am  #33


Re: Spring Training intrigue

APIAD wrote:

Being released by houston is like being dumped by a fat girl. It has to sting.

This is the second time in as many years the Astros have cut a Cardinals first round draft choice. Apparently, their girlfriends must not have been good-looking enough for Luhnow to keep them around.
 

 

3/13/2014 9:36 am  #34


Re: Spring Training intrigue

"I guess it depends on if they feel Martinez is ready to make the leap to 150 innings."

This would be kind of a novel approach, but I'd almost think it might be prudent to go with a 6-man rotation. You could work Wainwright every fifth day, and then rotate the other guys around his starts. As optimistic as we are about their rotation, the only pitcher other than Wainwright who has thrown more than 200 innings in a season is Lynn, who's done it once, and we've seen how he's worn down the last two years.
It'll never happen under Matheny because the blow back would be enormous, but I'd like to think it's something LaRussa might have considered.

Last edited by artie_fufkin (3/13/2014 9:36 am)

 

3/13/2014 10:15 am  #35


Re: Spring Training intrigue

artie_fufkin wrote:

APIAD wrote:

Being released by houston is like being dumped by a fat girl. It has to sting.

This is the second time in as many years the Astros have cut a Cardinals first round draft choice. Apparently, their girlfriends must not have been good-looking enough for Luhnow to keep them around.
 

Greene?
 

 

3/13/2014 10:17 am  #36


Re: Spring Training intrigue

artie_fufkin wrote:

"I guess it depends on if they feel Martinez is ready to make the leap to 150 innings."

This would be kind of a novel approach, but I'd almost think it might be prudent to go with a 6-man rotation. You could work Wainwright every fifth day, and then rotate the other guys around his starts. As optimistic as we are about their rotation, the only pitcher other than Wainwright who has thrown more than 200 innings in a season is Lynn, who's done it once, and we've seen how he's worn down the last two years.
It'll never happen under Matheny because the blow back would be enormous, but I'd like to think it's something LaRussa might have considered.

Short handing the bullpen isnt the cardinals style but i see ur point.  You could probably get full usefull season out of lynn, kelly, miller, wacha and martinez. 
 

 

3/13/2014 11:17 am  #37


Re: Spring Training intrigue

APIAD wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

APIAD wrote:

Being released by houston is like being dumped by a fat girl. It has to sting.

This is the second time in as many years the Astros have cut a Cardinals first round draft choice. Apparently, their girlfriends must not have been good-looking enough for Luhnow to keep them around.
 

Greene?
 

Yup.
 

 

3/13/2014 11:22 am  #38


Re: Spring Training intrigue

"Short handing the bullpen isnt the cardinals style but i see ur point."

You may not need to add a 13th pitcher. One of those guys, probably Kelly, is going to be the long reliever/spot starter you're not going to use after the 6th inning anyway. Instead of bringing him in from the bullpen, which he's proved he's sucked at, you just start him once a week. He's only going to go 5-6 innings anyway, so you're using him in the role he's best suited for, and you also limit the innings and increase the rest for Lynn, Miller, Martinez and Wacha.

 

3/13/2014 11:34 am  #39


Re: Spring Training intrigue

So the cycle goes something like this:
Monday: Wainwright
Tuesday: Wacha
Wednesday: Miller
Thursday: Lynn
Friday: Martinez
Saturday: Wanwright
Sunday: Kelly
Monday: Wacha
Tuesday: Miller
Wednesday: Lynn
Thursday: Wainwright
Friday: Martinez
Saturday: Kelly
Sunday: Wacha
Monday: Miller
Tuesday: Wainwright
Wednesday: Lynn
Thursday: Martinez
Friday: Kelly
Saturday: Wacha
Sunday: Wainwright
Monday: Miller 
Tuesday: Lynn
Wednesday: Martinez
Thursday: Kelly
Friday: Wainwright

Lather, rinse, repeat ...

 

3/13/2014 12:30 pm  #40


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I dont think kelly was horrible out of the pen.  He is a better starter but i still think he is usefull in the bullpen.

 

3/13/2014 1:20 pm  #41


Re: Spring Training intrigue

Lynn is a strikeout machine today. It's the Braves, but still.

 

3/13/2014 1:44 pm  #42


Re: Spring Training intrigue

APIAD wrote:

I dont think kelly was horrible out of the pen. He is a better starter but i still think he is usefull in the bullpen.

He wasn't horrible, but the discrepancy between his statistics as a starter and a reliever are dramatic. 
Randy Johnson sucked as a reliever at USC, so I guess it's all relative.
 

 

3/13/2014 1:47 pm  #43


Re: Spring Training intrigue

tkihshbt wrote:

Lynn is a strikeout machine today. It's the Braves, but still.

Hummel:JUPITER, Fla. • Lance Lynn, who allowed five runs in 1 1/3 innings in a relief appearance his last time out, seemed to enjoy his return to starting today.The Cardinals' righthander fanned eight Atlanta hitters in succession in the second and third, running his total to a staggering 10 over the first four innings of an exhibition game in which he permitted just one hit.Lynn, who has won 33 games the last two seasons but, at the same time has generated doubt, departed after throwing 44 strikes out of 66 pitches. He walked no one, giving just a second-inning single by Ernesto Mejia.The Cardinals hiked their lead to 4-0 in the third when Jhonny Peralta doubled in Matt Holliday, who had opened the inning with a walk.

 

3/13/2014 2:45 pm  #44


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I wouldn't like the idea of a 6 man rotation.  At some point, the training wheels have to come off.  Including the playoffs, Lynn pitched almost 220 innings last season.  He wasn't that good in July and August, but he was very good in September and with 33 starts I'm going to assume he took his turn every 5th day.  Miller pitched 174 innings last season.  No reason he can't pitch 190 this season.  Including the post-season Wacha pitched 180 innings, but I believe he was shut down at least once during the season so this year will be a bit of a new experience.

My memory is the same is Artie's which is that Kelly wasn't that effective as a reliever, but the numbers don't necessarily bear that out, so I could just be remembering wrong.  That said, for my tastes, Kelly walks too many batters to be an effective late inning option.  My preference would be to open the season with Kelly in the rotation and Martinez pitching the 8th inning.  Assuming Motte returns by May, ease him into the 8th inning role, and when Motte is ready to take it over full time, shift Martinez to the rotation.  That probably naturally limits Martinez to somewhere in the range of 150 innings for the season.

     Thread Starter
 

3/13/2014 3:07 pm  #45


Re: Spring Training intrigue

"My memory is the same is Artie's which is that Kelly wasn't that effective as a reliever, but the numbers don't necessarily bear that out, so I could just be remembering wrong."

He was terrible in April (8.30 ERA in eight appearances, all in relief), lousy in May (5.40, eight appearances, all in relief), phenomenal in June (0.96 in six appearances, five in relief). After he became a member of the rotation, he went 9-2 with a 2.28 ERA.
He made one releif appearance in September, in the game when they gave Westbrook that one inning curtain call at the end of the season. It was basically a start, and he threw 5 1/3 scoreless innings.
The thing last year I suspected a lot about Kelly - that he's only good for 75 pitches - really isn't borne out statistically. He's at his worst in pitches 1-25 (.305 BAA), really good in pitches 26-50 (.181 BAA), but he's about even between pitches 51-75 (.269 BAA) and 76-100 (.267).
Situationally, he's at his worst facing a hitter for the first time (.309 BAA in relief; .272 as a starter), but he rocks the second time he faces a hitter (.226; .214). If you break all that down and put it into blender, I think what you end up with is a decent starting pitcher and a lousy late inning reliever.

Last edited by artie_fufkin (3/13/2014 3:08 pm)

 

3/17/2014 8:43 am  #46


Re: Spring Training intrigue

Only 10 spring games left and here's my prediction for how everything shakes out:

-Despite missing a few games with hamstring issues, Bourjos is named the starter in center field. He's done really well this spring, while Jay has done everything in his power to lose his spot.
-Wong has at least guaranteed himself one half of a platoon.
-Kelly is probably going to win the fifth starter spot. Martinez and Rosenthal will handle the final two innings, but middle relief looks problematic right now. Maness has been terrible. Keith Butler has been terrible. Pat Neshek has always given up too many home runs. They really need Motte to be ready no later than April or I see an issue trying to get through the 6th-7th innings.
-Descalso has played well, but I'm just not comfortable with him backing up shortstop. It would've been nice to see Kozma have another spring like 2013.

Opening Day lineup prediction:

1. Carpenter
2. Peralta
3. Holliday
4. Craig
5. Molina
6. Adams
7. Bourjos
8. Wong

I would personally go:

1. Carpenter
2. Wong
3. Holliday
4. Adams
5. Craig
6. Molina
7. Bourjos
8. Peralta

 

3/17/2014 8:53 am  #47


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I like yours better. I know Wong isn't a big OBP guy, but it seems to me they're wasting speed by not putting either Bourjos or him in the leadoff spot, and batting them consecutively in the order seems counter-productive. And I wouldn't be worried about Carpenter making adjustments to hitting second. He can probably hit well anywhere in the lineup, and the speed guys can swipe a lot of bases in front of him because of his plate discipline.
And I'd bat Craig third. He's going to end up with the highest BA on the team. 

Bourjos
Carpenter
Craig
Holliday
Adams
Molina
Peralta
Wong/Ellis

 

3/17/2014 10:26 am  #48


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I would tend to agree with Artie's way of thinking. I'd probably lead off Wong against RH pitching, but it makes sense to drop Carpenter to the #2 spot.

Wong
Carpenter
Holliday
Craig
Adams
Molina
Peralta
Bourjos
Pitcher

Maybe Matheny should bat the pitcher 8th. Put Bourjos and Wong back-to-back. :-)

     Thread Starter
 

3/17/2014 5:58 pm  #49


Re: Spring Training intrigue

Tyler Lyons is stinking it up this spring.....

 

3/17/2014 8:06 pm  #50


Re: Spring Training intrigue

I listened to the Red Sox broadcast for the last couple of innings. Apparently, we Cardinals fans are bitter about losing the World Series last year.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]