You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



4/24/2014 11:39 am  #26


Re: Pujols

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Deidre's tirade against the Cardinals wasn't an act."

Anyone who thinks their god cares about where they play baseball isn't acting.

So if god wanted pujols to have 300 million doallar does that mean he wants me to be broke?
 

 

4/24/2014 11:44 am  #27


Re: Pujols

tkihshbt wrote:

APIAD wrote:

Whats the scoop?

 
I think it's been talked about, but I like it hearing it again: Arte Moreno was going balls out when he met with Pujols. He apparently promised Pujols everything he wanted, while also speaking to him in Spanish, which was a big deal. Also, Albert insisted, even to Edmonds, that the Cardinals never made him a formal offer. Whether he is re-framing that as "they never made me a formal offer" or "they never made me a formal offer I took serious" is still unknowb,

Another thing: Deidre's tirade against the Cardinals wasn't an act. Edmonds says she runs the household like a militant. He claims she's a nice woman, but she calls the shots in the family. I'm guessing when Pujols talks about how "God" wanted him to have the money, he really meant "Deidre."

 
Makes me feel good that a hall of fame baseball player with millions still has to do what his wifes wants or he is in trouble.

 

4/24/2014 11:45 am  #28


Re: Pujols

Speaking for Artie now, but I think he's saying that the Angels were foolishly chasing headlines in a city that is dominated by the Dodgers and Lakers, which makes Moreno dumb for spending over $400 million on three players. You're not going to dethrone the Dodgers. It's just not possible. Now he's got two players in their early to mid-30s who are paid exorbitant salaries which have gotten them nowhere near the playoffs.

     Thread Starter
 

4/24/2014 11:48 am  #29


Re: Pujols

tkihshbt wrote:

Speaking for Artie now, but I think he's saying that the Angels were foolishly chasing headlines in a city that is dominated by the Dodgers and Lakers, which makes Moreno dumb for spending over $400 million on three players. You're not going to dethrone the Dodgers. It's just not possible. Now he's got two players in their early to mid-30s who are paid exorbitant salaries which have gotten them nowhere near the playoffs.

When your in the situation the angles are in there is only one way to get the cities attention and that is to win and win yearly.  Like in chicago, it ispretty much a cubs town.  When the white sox win they get attention but is fades to nothing as soon as they lose again. 
 

 

4/24/2014 12:18 pm  #30


Re: Pujols

tkihshbt wrote:

I didn't know that. Sterling is easily the most reprehensible owner. If the Rams leave for L.A., Stan Kroenke will be the new No. 1.

Kroenke better start spending money on soccer players, or he's going to be burned in effigy in North London.
The Buffalo Braves/Boston Celtics swap is probably second only to the Florida Marlins/Boston Red Sox/Montreal Expos manure festival in the history of sports ownership shenanigans.
The Braves were owned by John Y. Brown, who basically built his fortune by franchising Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants and became governor of Kentucky. The Celtics were owned by Irv Levin, a shady Hollywood-type whose personality and reputation were too distatsteful for even the NBA (a remarkable achievement in the '70s, when players were snorting cocaine in the locker rooms).
Levin wanted to move the Celtics to the West Coast for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the Celtics have always had a hard time making money because the buildings in which they've played have been owned by the Bruins, but Larry O'Brien, who was the NBA Commissioner at the time, told him there was no way he was relocating the most successful franchise in the history of the league, so O'Brien arranged a swap with Brown, who was more than willing to leave Buffalo.
The interesting dynamic was the teams had to trade their players to each other as part of the deal. Most of them anyway. I think the Celtics ended up with Tiny Archibald and a couple of other guys from the Braves, and the Braves wound up with a couple of scrubs from the Cetlics. The league tried unsuccessfuly to keep that part of it quiet, and someone in the Boston media noted John Havlicek, maybe the most popular Celtics' player of all-time, was actually property of the Buffalo Braves for about a half-hour. 
Levin moved the Braves to San Diego, where they became the Clippers, then sold to Sterling, who moved them to L.A.

 

 

4/24/2014 12:21 pm  #31


Re: Pujols

tkihshbt wrote:

I didn't know that. Sterling is easily the most reprehensible owner. If the Rams leave for L.A., Stan Kroenke will be the new No. 1.

My dad will be happy, though. He's never stopped calling them the Los Angeles Rams.
 

 

4/24/2014 12:23 pm  #32


Re: Pujols

APIAD wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Deidre's tirade against the Cardinals wasn't an act."

Anyone who thinks their god cares about where they play baseball isn't acting.

So if god wanted pujols to have 300 million doallar does that mean he wants me to be broke?
 

Rec.
If god had liked you, he would have taught you how to hit a curve.

 

4/24/2014 12:45 pm  #33


Re: Pujols

alz wrote:

I still don't see how going after a big name player or having the audacity to try to draw fans from the LA Dodgers market makes Moreno a douchebag.

Maybe I'm missing something in the translation.

Just my opinion, but Moreno's decision to sign Pujols was similar to the guy who buys a '92 Olds Cutlass for $750 bucks and then spends $20,000 on a new paint job, hydraulic lift kit, stereo/speakers and rims.  It may look splashy, but in the end it's still a car with a 20+ year old motor that's probably on its last legs.

Trying to tap into the Dodgers market isn't necessarily a mistake, but AP hit the nail on the head--the Angels are only relevant if they win.  Dropping $400+M on Pujols, Hamilton and Wilson haven't brought the Angels any closer to winning, in fact it's probably pushed them further away.  And as a result, the Angels have completely failed to tap into the Dodgers market and, with the resurgence of Dodgers, it's unlikely they ever will.

Moreno falls into the category of someone like Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones.  They love making moves that garner them attention, but those moves rarely work out well on the field.

 

 

4/24/2014 1:32 pm  #34


Re: Pujols

Meh, I'm not sure I agree with the malice is all. Jones and Moreno aren't hated for spending money on their teams... They are hated because they want to be the GM as well as the owner, and they don't win. Winning and losing falls directly on the GM who is fired by the owner if he fails... For Jones and Snyder, that's impossible.

Anyway you should be thanking Pujols God sincerely every night for the Angels taking him. I just don't understand the angst towards a man who did us a 200 million dollar favor....

 

4/24/2014 5:37 pm  #35


Re: Pujols

For the most part i dont think anyone is mad at pujols.

 

4/24/2014 9:27 pm  #36


Re: Pujols

I have no angst at all. I've been pretty consistent that I want Pujols to do well. It would be amazing to see the Angels and Cardinals in the World Series. Under Moreno, though, I don't see that coming to pass.

There are certain types who are angry towards Pujols, but they think Stan Musial stayed a Cardinal because he wanted to. 

     Thread Starter
 

1/28/2016 8:59 am  #37


Re: Pujols

This is the part of the off-season where we express gratitude to Arte Moreno for backing up the Brink's truck to Albert's door.

http://www.halosheaven.com/2016/1/27/10855332/if-albert-pujols-has-his-way-hell-be-back-for-opening-day-angels-may

 

1/29/2016 10:29 am  #38


 

2/01/2016 6:35 pm  #39


Re: Pujols

artie_fufkin wrote:

This is the part of the off-season where we express gratitude to Arte Moreno for backing up the Brink's truck to Albert's door.

http://www.halosheaven.com/2016/1/27/10855332/if-albert-pujols-has-his-way-hell-be-back-for-opening-day-angels-may

Pujols has put up really good power numbers in his 4 years with Anaheim, but it's staggering how bad of a hitter he's become.  I know injuries played a part, but he hit .244 last season, and he's hitting .266 over 4 seasons in Anaheim.  I always figured he'd settle in somewhere around .280.  Pujols' career average is now .312.  It was .328 when he left St. Louis.  

Also, a friend saw Pujols over the weekend at an event for his charity.  He said Pujols looked really overweight.  That happened before when he had issues with his foot.  It'll be interesting to see what kind of numbers he posts this season.

 

5/04/2016 1:30 pm  #40


Re: Pujols

Cracks the Mendoza line!
Now batting .204.
After today, Pujols is still yet to be paid $161,567,902 by the Angels.

 

5/04/2016 1:51 pm  #41


Re: Pujols

Between him and Heyward... The Cardinals FO saved us nearly half a billion dollars in money that were not going to get us much back....

 

2/23/2017 9:10 pm  #42


Re: Pujols

Obviously, this gets more speculative with each subsequent season, but it's an interesting read:

http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/st-louis-cardinals-sabermetrics-analysis/2017/2/21/14589414/what-if-the-cardinals-had-signed-albert-pujols-after-2011

 

6/04/2017 9:05 am  #43


Re: Pujols

Credit where credit's due...Congratulations to Albert on #600. I'd love to see him crack the 700 club before it's all over.

 

6/04/2017 11:13 am  #44


Re: Pujols

Me to!  Congrats to pujols. 

It is sort of wierd seeing pujols with such a low BA.  Next year he could be below a .300 hitter.  Id like to see him rack up the historic numbers tho.

 

6/04/2017 11:29 am  #45


Re: Pujols

JV wrote:

Credit where credit's due...Congratulations to Albert on #600. I'd love to see him crack the 700 club before it's all over.

I've been trying to stay awake to watch him hit #600, but I only made it through one at bat last night. For whatever reason, his quest really isn't getting a lot of attention. Especially considering he's only the ninth player to get to 600 homers.

 

6/04/2017 11:39 am  #46


Re: Pujols

APIAD wrote:

Me to! Congrats to pujols.

It is sort of wierd seeing pujols with such a low BA. Next year he could be below a .300 hitter. Id like to see him rack up the historic numbers tho.

MLBN had a segment on this yesterday. Harold Reynolds' theory is he had to sacrifice average for power and became a pull hitter once he got to the Angels because the parks in the AL West are so much more spacious than they are in the NL Central. 

 

6/04/2017 12:23 pm  #47


Re: Pujols

That might have something to do with it.  Pujols pressed hard in his first year with the angels.  He has dealt with alot of foot issues as well.  Plus i he was already trending down.  It is probably a little of each.  I dont completely buy the idea that the AL is so much harder to hit in.  It seems any hitter who goes to texas hits 30 bombs.

 

6/04/2017 5:16 pm  #48


Re: Pujols

artie_fufkin wrote:

APIAD wrote:

Me to! Congrats to pujols.

It is sort of wierd seeing pujols with such a low BA. Next year he could be below a .300 hitter. Id like to see him rack up the historic numbers tho.

MLBN had a segment on this yesterday. Harold Reynolds' theory is he had to sacrifice average for power and became a pull hitter once he got to the Angels because the parks in the AL West are so much more spacious than they are in the NL Central. 

Ummm, Houston and Texas are in the AL West and there were more HRs hit in Seattle last year than in any other ballpark.

Still, good for Albert getting to 600. Assuming he stays healthy, there's a good chance he gets his 3,000th hit and 2,000th RBI next season. The latter definitely puts him in some exclusive company.

 

6/04/2017 6:22 pm  #49


Re: Pujols

Pujols still has 4.5 years left on this contract.  If he averages 120h 20hr 70rbi per year he gets to a career total of 3360h, 690hr, 2175rbi.

Respectively that puts him 10th, 5th and 3rd.....

 

6/05/2017 8:20 am  #50


Re: Pujols

"Ummm, Houston and Texas are in the AL West and there were more HRs hit in Seattle last year than in any other ballpark."

Yeah, I don't really ascribe to Reynolds' theory. Though I did do some research and it turns out that except for Texas, all the ballparks in the ALW are classified as "pitchers' parks" by Baseball Reference. The whole thing can be pretty subjective. ESPN had Turner Field ranked as a "pitchers' park" last year, but a lot of that had to do with the Braves' weak lineup.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]