Offline
to Seattle for Class A pitcher Mikael Cleto.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
to Seattle for Class A pitcher Mikael Cleto.
Thanks for the update, TK.
Well, they really did a great job of talking down his value. I think I'm one of the few here who's glad to see Ryan go based not only on what fors has reported but also what I've seen on the field. But TLR's need rub another's face in the dirt when they dare to piss him off is another clear example of his putting his own image ahead of the best interests of the organization.
And I'm not unaware that Moz made public comments that made it clear they had to dump Ryan. But I suspect a lot of that is simply giving TLR the support he expects.
Offline
I know nothing about Cleto except what I'm reading. Power arm that regularly hits the high 90s and has touched 100. Has control issues. Was part of the package that the Mets sent to Seattle for JJ Putz.
Offline
"Power arm that regularly hits the high 90s and has touched 100. Has control issues."
Great. The Cardinals traded King Cornholio for Nuke LaLoosh.
Offline
Mags wrote:
tkihshbt wrote:
to Seattle for Class A pitcher Mikael Cleto.
Thanks for the update, TK.
Well, they really did a great job of talking down his value. I think I'm one of the few here who's glad to see Ryan go based not only on what fors has reported but also what I've seen on the field. But TLR's need rub another's face in the dirt when they dare to piss him off is another clear example of his putting his own image ahead of the best interests of the organization.
And I'm not unaware that Moz made public comments that made it clear they had to dump Ryan. But I suspect a lot of that is simply giving TLR the support he expects.
Well, I agree and disagree. I agree it is a shame that they spent a few months talking down his value, and I agree that La Russa probably had a large role there. it wasn't quite the punitive trades that sent Tino Martinez to Tamba bay when they sucked, and King to Colorado to pitch in Mile High Stadium (I forget where Kline got packaged off to), but this did pretty much have "I want him outta here by the time I get back" stamped all over it.
On the other hand, I would chalk it up to a disciplinarian who insists that his law is final, which is almost admirable in these days of stars who are more powerful than their manager/coach.
On the bright side, maybe I'll get the chance to get down there and see him play.
Offline
Max wrote:
On the other hand, I would chalk it up to a disciplinarian who insists that his law is final, which is almost admirable in these days of stars who are more powerful than their manager/coach.
You're starting to sound like an aging academic who takes his job seriously.
All kidding aside, I agree with you 100% and that was one of the things I liked about TLR when he first came to the Cards. And you may recall, although I think you were on the DL at the time, that I defended TLR for sitting Ryan down in the middle of a game when he swung and flied out on a 3-0 pitch in one of the first games he played in.
It just seems to make that LaRussa gets more on more open about the disciplinary action he takes and the conflicts he has with players. I recall how very surprised I was to learn in the late 70's that Dick Williams, whom I had seen on t.v. many times and followed pretty regularly, had the reputation for being a strict disciplinarian. On t.v. and in the interviews I saw, he always seemed to have a very compassionate feeling toward his players and kept any conflicts he had within the club house. Even though the Oakland team was loaded with guys who liked to shoot off their mouths about each other and Williams too.
Williams did become more open in his criticisms in his last few years and that may be what is happening with LaRussa. But Williams was definitely on his way down as a manager by that time.
Last edited by Mags (12/12/2010 9:23 pm)
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
to Seattle for Class A pitcher Mikael Cleto.
I had never heard of Mikael Cleto, but I just Googled the name and it turns out it is Greek for Evan Rust, "The Cardinals acquired an unvarnished power arm they believe projects as a closer or a set-up man."
Now, onto another point. Not only does Ryan come off in interviews like a raging out-of-control motormouth dickhead, he shows all the wisdom and insightfulness of a rotten tomato. Listen to this rant, and see if you can diagnose his illness:
"I believe I've never been blamed for not being me. I think you can spin it any way you want. If you've got some personalities, that can be a good or a bad thing. I think I was the same guy in '09 that I was in '10. But when you're struggling, it's easier to point to certain things to explain what's going on. It's cute and fun when things are going well. But when you're struggling, it's easier to say, 'He wasn't focused or prepared.' I don't think that's the case. It's more about lost confidence and feeling lost."
Last edited by Max (12/13/2010 10:56 am)
Offline
Ryan was apparently traded for a bag of salted peanuts ($3.95 retail) an extra mulligan at a golfing contest to be named at a later date, a bottle of Mad Dog 20/20 and nudes of Sharon Stone. Oh and some dude apparently named "Pitching Prospect".
I think Moz did pretty well here.
Offline
alz wrote:
Ryan was apparently traded for a bag of salted peanuts ($3.95 retail) an extra mulligan at a golfing contest to be named at a later date, a bottle of Mad Dog 20/20 and nudes of Sharon Stone. Oh and some dude apparently named "Pitching Prospect".
I think Moz did pretty well here.
I think you're being sarcastic. But seriously, I am surprised at how little interest they had in this guy after they spent literally months shouting to anyone who would listen that he didn't get along with his manager or clubhouse veterans and had to be traded.
Offline
Max wrote:
I think you're being sarcastic. But seriously, I am surprised at how little interest they had in this guy after they spent literally months shouting to anyone who would listen that he didn't get along with his manager or clubhouse veterans and had to be traded.
I think you are also being sarcastic, as was I. It seems counter-productive to trash someone on the team, regardless of actual feelings about him or his situation.
For example.
1) You are shopping a great defensive shortstop coming off a down year at the plate
-or-
2) You are shopping a great defensive shortstop who's a clubhouse distration, derisive, won't allow for veterans to lead, can't get along with anyone, and is coming off a terrible year at the plate.
As a GM of another team, I could be interested in the first guy depending on the price, but you'd almost need to pay me to take door #2....
Offline
Here's the excellent Joe Posnanski's take on the situation. Beware: if you're a La Russa honk, you're going to find this article to be as offensive as pornography.
OK, not that much. But he does believe that La Russa wields too much power and they are trying to cobble together another winner so Tone can ride off into the sunset.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
Here's the excellent Joe Posnanski's take on the situation. Beware: if you're a La Russa honk, you're going to find this article to be as offensive as pornography.
OK, not that much. But he does believe that La Russa wields too much power and they are trying to cobble together another winner so Tone can ride off into the sunset.
I think you are reading into that piece what you want to hear, to some extent. He writes: "it does not feel like that Cardinals are building a team as much as it feels like they are trying to cobble together one more winner for Tony La Russa." Doesn't write anything about La Russa having too much power, or else I missed it. And frankly, I think Moz and Luhnow could combine on a strong rebuttal of the first point. Then again, filling holes with 1-2 year deals was the Jocketty way, too. And above all that, the fact that Pujols remains a $25-30 million question mark could have an impact.
I thought his most insightful writing concerned the deception and self-deception that makes us so human. This business that Theriot made Ryan expendable spoke volumes about how little Ryan's presence was wanted within the Cardinals organization. La Russa and some unnamed veterans surely are responsible to large measure. Only time will tell who wisdom was wise, but in the meantime we can all learn something about the way people disguise their true feelings and true motivations.
Offline
And here's Gordon's take, which I like as far as it goes:
Moz and LaRussa come off a little better than they deserve, I think. But that really isn't the point of his column one way or the other.
I do think his perspective is a little too narrow. It isn't just a matter of old school versus something else. It's a matter of having the right kind of players at certain positions. Simmons was one of my all time favorite Cardinals but I always realized he wasn't what a winning team had to have behind the plate. Porter was. Templeton not only was a tremendous offensive force, but he had great athleticism at short - tremendous range and an arm that Ozzie couldn't touch on his best day. In fact, Ozzie and Maxvill together probably had Templeton's arm -- probably. But he lacked the one thing that you've got to have at short, second, center and behind the plate -- dependability and seriousness of purpose.
Also, even though I'm the last person to defend LaRussa, I think Gordon's a little unfair when he says LaRussa's got his team and now it is up to him to deliver. It seems to me this team still has some serious problems. A lot of that may be LaRussa's fault but Gordon hasn't made the case for it.
Offline
Max wrote:
...but in the meantime we can all learn something about the way people disguise their true feelings and true motivations.
Or see further confirmation of what we have previously observed on many, many occasions.
Offline
"It seems to me this team still has some serious problems."
They've done very little to give us confidence that they've addressed the problems from last season other than improving their offense at shortstop from Ryan's 2010 numbers. If Ryan reverts to his 2009 numbers because it turned out his wrist injury was more of a problem than he led on, then they're worse off on the whole because almost every ground ball that gets past the pitcher will be a single to center.
Their outfield defense with Holliday playing a new position and Tubby O'Goo in left has gone from average to abysmal, or above average to abysmal if you start the timeline with the Ricky Ludwig trade. They're counting on Lohse to not get hurt and/or not suck. They're counting on Freese to not get hurt and/or not suck. They're counting on a lefthanded bullpen duo with one guy who has arm problems and another who is a project coming off a poor season.
As Fors says (or was it Windy?), La Russa has a knack for whipping up chicken salad when everyone else smells chicken shit, but as things stack up right now I just don't see how the Cardinals are capable of competing with the Reds.
Last edited by artie_fufkin (12/13/2010 8:07 pm)
Offline
It is the off season and I think we all get giddy with roster moves or at least the thought of meaningful roster moves. But yeah, I agree with Artie. This teams isnt any better right now then they were in October.
Offline
Simmons was one of my all time favorite Cardinals but I always realized he wasn't what a winning team had to have behind the plate.
The 1982 Milwaukee Brewers must have lucked into those 97 wins with Simba. If only he had Grit, Hustle and Determination, they would've been champions.
Sorry if that comes across as mean, Max. It's not personally directed at you, but I get tired of hearing about how the Cardinals couldn't win with Simmons. Bullshit. I wasn't even alive then and I know they could've won with him.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
Simmons was one of my all time favorite Cardinals but I always realized he wasn't what a winning team had to have behind the plate.
The 1982 Milwaukee Brewers must have lucked into those 97 wins with Simba. If only he had Grit, Hustle and Determination, they would've been champions.
Sorry if that comes across as mean, Max. It's not personally directed at you, but I get tired of hearing about how the Cardinals couldn't win with Simmons. Bullshit. I wasn't even alive then and I know they could've won with him.
That was Mags who wrote the part about Simmons.
(I can't wait to see how this plays out. As KC would say, pass the popcorn ...)
Offline
Whoops. Sorry, Max. This is on you, Mags.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
tkihshbt wrote:
Simmons was one of my all time favorite Cardinals but I always realized he wasn't what a winning team had to have behind the plate.
The 1982 Milwaukee Brewers must have lucked into those 97 wins with Simba. If only he had Grit, Hustle and Determination, they would've been champions.
Sorry if that comes across as mean, Max. It's not personally directed at you, but I get tired of hearing about how the Cardinals couldn't win with Simmons. Bullshit. I wasn't even alive then and I know they could've won with him.That was Mags who wrote the part about Simmons.
(I can't wait to see how this plays out. As KC would say, pass the popcorn ...)
"Whoops. Sorry, Max. This is on you, Mags."
TK, you ignorant slut. You weren't alive when Bill Murray uttered those words, either, and I won't dignify your post with a response, other than to say your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries. I fart in your general direction.
Offline
Max wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
tkihshbt wrote:
The 1982 Milwaukee Brewers must have lucked into those 97 wins with Simba. If only he had Grit, Hustle and Determination, they would've been champions.
Sorry if that comes across as mean, Max. It's not personally directed at you, but I get tired of hearing about how the Cardinals couldn't win with Simmons. Bullshit. I wasn't even alive then and I know they could've won with him.That was Mags who wrote the part about Simmons.
(I can't wait to see how this plays out. As KC would say, pass the popcorn ...)"Whoops. Sorry, Max. This is on you, Mags."
TK, you ignorant slut. You weren't alive when Bill Murray uttered those words, either, and I won't dignify your post with a response, other than to say your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries. I fart in your general direction.
Run away before he taunts you a second time, TK.
Offline
From FB: even Matt Leach pulls few punches regarding the Cleto trade.
Offline
Max wrote:
From FB: even Matt Leach pulls few punches regarding the Cleto trade.
Way to be insightful, Pigpen. Anyone on this board could have answered the questions he picked.
Last edited by artie_fufkin (12/14/2010 12:28 am)
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
Max wrote:
From FB: even Matt Leach pulls few punches regarding the Cleto trade.
Way to be insightful, Pigpen. Anyone on this board could have answered the questions he picked.
Damn, I'm glad I'm not a sports journalist by trade, because all too often the critiques sound like, "I coulda written that." Which is ironic because the off-the-record Brendan Ryan must be saying, "Theriot?!? You have to be fucking kidding me. I can play shortstop better than him with one hand tied behind my back." Which only goes to show that more times than not it is how you toady up to people in positions of power that determines whether your lucky break is 15 minutes of fame or a career of saying the right thing at the right time.
Oh, and by the way, if you want to save money, they're selling single serving bottles of wine in the newer 1.5 L size.
Last edited by Max (12/14/2010 1:31 am)
Offline
"all too often the critiques sound like, "I coulda written that."
Heck, many of us have already written the answers to some of those questions on this board.