You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



7/06/2011 10:12 pm  #26


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Descalso isnt Rolen but he has got some kind of arm.

 

7/06/2011 10:35 pm  #27


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

How does a guy change his name from Francisco De La Cruz to Jose Arredondo?

 

7/06/2011 10:36 pm  #28


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

Nice play by DeShields.

I think a Delino reference is an automatic ten bucks.

 

7/06/2011 10:39 pm  #29


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Hey Tone. Swipe a bag here.

 

7/06/2011 10:41 pm  #30


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

If Theriot wins the game right here, Hrabosky is going to blump him in the clubhouse later.

 

7/06/2011 10:43 pm  #31


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

artie_fufkin wrote:

Hey Tone. Swipe a bag here.

That works, too.

 

7/06/2011 10:44 pm  #32


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

artie_fufkin wrote:

If Theriot wins the game right here, Hrabosky is going to blump him in the clubhouse later.

Rec.

Thanks to Theriot for giving me blue balls. He missed a slider that didn't slide, then swung at some crap that bounced on the plate.

     Thread Starter
 

7/06/2011 10:55 pm  #33


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

I came in late. Why have there been so many John Mabry references tonight?

 

7/06/2011 11:00 pm  #34


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

That was just a lousy at-bat by Freese.

     Thread Starter
 

7/06/2011 11:01 pm  #35


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

artie_fufkin wrote:

I came in late. Why have there been so many John Mabry references tonight?

The May 2005 game in Cincinnati when Mabry completed a six-run ninth inning comeback by homering off of Graves.

     Thread Starter
 

7/06/2011 11:14 pm  #36


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

That's that. The offense was taking way too many shitty at-bats.

     Thread Starter
 

7/06/2011 11:35 pm  #37


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

Descalso can't do it every time.

This is Jake Westbrook's fault.

why not cut to the chase and blame mozeliak for trading ludwick to get a guy who probably would have been released the next day, and then feeling so guilty about trading away ludwick for a guy who did not perform well enough to get us over the hump and into the playoffs, that he then signed him to a ridiculous contract for what, 3 years???, just to prove he was right in the first place.

 

7/07/2011 12:00 am  #38


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Max wrote:

tkihshbt wrote:

Descalso can't do it every time.

This is Jake Westbrook's fault.

why not cut to the chase and blame mozeliak for trading ludwick to get a guy who probably would have been released the next day, and then feeling so guilty about trading away ludwick for a guy who did not perform well enough to get us over the hump and into the playoffs, that he then signed him to a ridiculous contract for what, 3 years???, just to prove he was right in the first place.

Let's just blame Ludwick.

 

7/07/2011 12:01 am  #39


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

I came in late. Why have there been so many John Mabry references tonight?

The May 2005 game in Cincinnati when Mabry completed a six-run ninth inning comeback by homering off of Graves.

I could have homered off Graves that night.

 

7/07/2011 8:37 am  #40


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Not for nuthin', but if you rally from eight runs down and send the game into extra innings, aren't you ultimately supposed to win?

 

7/07/2011 9:13 am  #41


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

artie_fufkin wrote:

Not for nuthin', but if you rally from eight runs down and send the game into extra innings, aren't you ultimately supposed to win?

Not if Sylvester Stallone write the script.

 

7/07/2011 9:42 am  #42


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Max wrote:

tkihshbt wrote:

Descalso can't do it every time.

This is Jake Westbrook's fault.

why not cut to the chase and blame mozeliak for trading ludwick to get a guy who probably would have been released the next day, and then feeling so guilty about trading away ludwick for a guy who did not perform well enough to get us over the hump and into the playoffs, that he then signed him to a ridiculous contract for what, 3 years???, just to prove he was right in the first place.

It was La Russa and Duncan who were pushing for the trade of a starting pitcher.

Jake Westbrook gave the Cardinals 75 innings and a 3.48 ERA, so it seems silly to lay the Cardinals not winning 92 games at his feet.

When Westbrook was acquired, the Cardinals were giving starts to Blake Hawksworth and Kyle Lohse.

It's preposterous to suggest that "guilt" was the reason the Cardinals re-signed Westbrook. Given his repertoire and the fact that he was a solid No. 4, Westbrook becoming completely ineffective at just 33 was not something anyone could have foreseen.

And Westbrook was NOT going to be released. You just completely made that up.

     Thread Starter
 

7/07/2011 11:57 am  #43


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

"And Westbrook was NOT going to be released. You just completely made that up."

And if he had been, there's no way he would have cleared waivers and become a free agent.
Westbrook was already in the shower by the time I got home last night, but I'm guessing he fell behind hitters early in the count in the first inning.
There are two Jake Westbrooks. The one we saw in Tampa over the weekend who works ahead in the count, and the other who is afraid to throw strikes because the guy at the plate might take him deep.
At some point, he's got to figure out that it's better to throw one pitch in an at bat that might catch too much of the plate than it is to try to throw five pitches outside of the zone hoping the batter will go fishing.

 

7/07/2011 1:11 pm  #44


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Seems like the chart labeled : "pitch locations by type", Jake threw some sinkers that didn't sink and were hammered .

http://pitchfx.texasleaguers.com/pitcher/150414/?batters=A&pitches=AA&from=7/6/2011&to=7/6/2011

 

7/07/2011 3:29 pm  #45


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

Max wrote:

tkihshbt wrote:

Descalso can't do it every time.

This is Jake Westbrook's fault.

why not cut to the chase and blame mozeliak for trading ludwick to get a guy who probably would have been released the next day, and then feeling so guilty about trading away ludwick for a guy who did not perform well enough to get us over the hump and into the playoffs, that he then signed him to a ridiculous contract for what, 3 years???, just to prove he was right in the first place.

It was La Russa and Duncan who were pushing for the trade of a starting pitcher.

Jake Westbrook gave the Cardinals 75 innings and a 3.48 ERA, so it seems silly to lay the Cardinals not winning 92 games at his feet.

When Westbrook was acquired, the Cardinals were giving starts to Blake Hawksworth and Kyle Lohse.

It's preposterous to suggest that "guilt" was the reason the Cardinals re-signed Westbrook. Given his repertoire and the fact that he was a solid No. 4, Westbrook becoming completely ineffective at just 33 was not something anyone could have foreseen.

And Westbrook was NOT going to be released. You just completely made that up.

You sound very defensive of Mozeliak, which is a bit ironic since your take at the time was that it had all the hallmarks of the front office lining up a salary dump for 2011.  Instead, Westbrook was rewarded with, what, a three year deal at north of $8 million per year, unless I am mistaken.

Last edited by Max (7/07/2011 3:33 pm)

 

7/07/2011 3:34 pm  #46


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

You're mistaken.  Westbrook's deal is only for 2 years.

 

7/07/2011 3:44 pm  #47


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

Good, relieved to hear that.  So it was something like $17 million for two years?  In any case, definitely not a salary dump in the end.

 

7/07/2011 3:49 pm  #48


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

$16.5M/2 years

 

7/07/2011 4:11 pm  #49


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

Jake Westbrook gave the Cardinals 75 innings and a 3.48 ERA, so it seems silly to lay the Cardinals not winning 92 games at his feet.

Cardinal starters 2010 stats after Westbrook acquired

Wainwright- 11 starts, 6-5, 77 IP, 2.81 ERA, 1.09 WHIP
Carpenter- 12 starts, 5-6, 78.1 IP, 3.79 ERA, 1.19 WHIP
Garcia- 8 starts, 4-4, 47.1 IP, 3.61 ERA, 1.39 WHIP
Westbrook- 12 starts, 4-4, 75 IP, 3.48 ERA, 1.25 WHIP
Lohse- 9 starts, 3-4, 44.2 IP, 7.25 ERA, 1.95 WHIP

 

7/07/2011 4:28 pm  #50


Re: 7/6 Gamecrap

I think we know who the culprit of the 2010 rotation is.

You sound very defensive of Mozeliak, which is a bit ironic since your take at the time was that it had all the hallmarks of the front office lining up a salary dump for 2011.

And I still think it was, though I supported the acquisition of Westbrook.

The Cardinals lost in 2010 because their offense was non-existent in the last two months of the season. They got nothing from catcher, second base, third base (obviously), shortstop and eventually right field. The starting pitching was fine; the bullpen and offense was not.

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]