Westbrook has been the weakest link so far.  It make little sence to make a move that ships off one of the top three pitchers (Carp, Loshe or Garcia).  I could see a mix an match approach as far as applying McCellan and Westbrook to the rotation if they add another pitcher.

"I suspect this is just Tone being Tone.  If they get a starter, the guy who pitched effectively in the bullpen the last 3 season returns to the bullpen."

Mega-dittoes. TLR gets to rattle his sword on behalf of one of his guys, who will earn some serious LaRussa Bucks (if this board has accomplished anything, it's TK's introduction of that term) when he moves back to the bullpen.
My answer is D).

APRTW wrote:

With Sanchez gone McCellan would really help the bullpen.  It all really depends on who the pitcher is.  It has to be a top rotation guy to really make a difference.  I am still really interested in Erik Bedard.  Not really as the guy but one of the guys the Cardinals get at the deadline.  He can be a top of the rotation pitcher.  He is high risk for injury but his current trip to the DL has nothing to do with his arm or shoulder.  The rest might actually make him a better person to trade for.  Also he doesnt cost the Cardinals much money at all and shouldnt cost them but one average prospect.

If you are right about Bedard being somewhat healthy then I can totally imagine the Cards trying to put together a deal for Bedard and Wilson, and my first guess is that would require either Rasmus, or several of the Jay, Craig, Sanchez/Salas, type of players.  Sanchez probably saved his future in a Cardinals uniform by getting injured, though.

tkihshbt wrote:

That's way too big of a package for Bedard, who is never healthy and will be a free agent this winter. If Seattle asks for anyone of significance, the Cardinals would hang up on them and justifiably so.

Bedard is of no use to them.  They will take anyone.  Anyone I could name off the top of my head would likely be off limits in that deal.  I might let them have Pete Kozma.