You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



10/03/2010 6:23 am  #1


Braves lose, Padres win

"The NL West goes to the Padres. The wild card goes to the Giants. The Braves go home. In this scenario, the Padres and Giants both would celebrate clinching postseason berths in the same park for only the second time in MLB history: The Houston Astros and St. Louis Cardinals did it in 2001."

Funny, I don't even remember that.  So, what happens, the Giants, playing at home, hit into a game-ending double-play, and then come leaping out of the dugout, with champagne and dump an ice bucket on Bochy's head?

 

10/03/2010 11:36 am  #2


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Other notables of the last day:

Boston at home can play spoiler for the Yankees, and if there's a way, there's a will.

Kansas City at home can play patsies for the Rays, any bets?

Jeff Suppan might be making the last start of his career, and if it is, it will have been at Busch in a Cardinals home uniform. 

The Cubs are playing what is shaping up to be a very interesting and relevant game in Houston . . .
BWA-HAA-HAA-HAA-HAAA!



What did I miss?

Last edited by Max (10/03/2010 11:38 am)

     Thread Starter
 

10/03/2010 12:39 pm  #3


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Max wrote:

Other notables of the last day:


What did I miss?

Gonzalez isn't in the starting lineup, so Pujols has a clear path to the RBI crown.  It'd be nice to see him get a couple of hits today and get his BA to .315 and pass Votto for the lead in OPS so we can have a legitimate beef when the latter gets the MVP as the pundits think he will.

 

10/03/2010 4:17 pm  #4


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

JV wrote:

It'd be nice to see [Pujols] get a couple of hits today and get his BA to .315 and pass Votto for the lead in OPS so we can have a legitimate beef when the latter gets the MVP as the pundits think he will.

Let's see, Pujols has scored 10 more runs, has 6 more RBI's, 5 more home runs, 24 more walks, 7 more hits, played in 9 more games, and has the identical slugging percentage compared with Votto.  So, sure, I can see Votto being the consensus favorite for MVP . . . I guess.

     Thread Starter
 

10/03/2010 4:17 pm  #5


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Looks like Jay was held out of the game to keep his BA at .300.

Soup should call it career.  This is as a happy of an end as he is going to find.  6 innings of shutout baseball in St. Louis.

 

10/03/2010 4:20 pm  #6


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Let's hope Aaron Miles decides to call it a career as well.

 

10/03/2010 5:01 pm  #7


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

APRTW wrote:

Looks like Jay was held out of the game to keep his BA at .300.

I don't think it will accomplish much, other than to give Jay something to brag about once he's out of baseball.  As much as I would like for Jay to flourish in majors, playing for the Cardinals, I am not expecting it at this point.  Nor does he have any real trade value, I suspect.  I am not baseball man, but this whole experience has the ring of a guy who hit the league with a bang, and who then should have been shielded and used as trade bait.  Instead, we needed him, he was exposed, and now he probably wouldn't even warrant being included as a player TBN.  Sad to say, but that my two cents now.

Maybe we could try him at second base?

Last edited by Max (10/03/2010 5:02 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

10/03/2010 6:14 pm  #8


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Max wrote:

APRTW wrote:

Looks like Jay was held out of the game to keep his BA at .300.

I don't think it will accomplish much, other than to give Jay something to brag about once he's out of baseball.  As much as I would like for Jay to flourish in majors, playing for the Cardinals, I am not expecting it at this point.  Nor does he have any real trade value, I suspect.  I am not baseball man, but this whole experience has the ring of a guy who hit the league with a bang, and who then should have been shielded and used as trade bait.  Instead, we needed him, he was exposed, and now he probably wouldn't even warrant being included as a player TBN.  Sad to say, but that my two cents now.

Maybe we could try him at second base?

Jay has value to the 2011 Cardinals as a 4th outfilder who can play all 3 OF positions. If he has to do anymore than that, the front office failed.

 

10/03/2010 6:55 pm  #9


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Max wrote:

JV wrote:

It'd be nice to see [Pujols] get a couple of hits today and get his BA to .315 and pass Votto for the lead in OPS so we can have a legitimate beef when the latter gets the MVP as the pundits think he will.

Let's see, Pujols has scored 10 more runs, has 6 more RBI's, 5 more home runs, 24 more walks, 7 more hits, played in 9 more games, and has the identical slugging percentage compared with Votto.  So, sure, I can see Votto being the consensus favorite for MVP . . . I guess.

And is a better defensive player at the same position.

 

10/03/2010 6:59 pm  #10


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Max wrote:

APRTW wrote:

Looks like Jay was held out of the game to keep his BA at .300.

I don't think it will accomplish much, other than to give Jay something to brag about once he's out of baseball.  As much as I would like for Jay to flourish in majors, playing for the Cardinals, I am not expecting it at this point.  Nor does he have any real trade value, I suspect.  I am not baseball man, but this whole experience has the ring of a guy who hit the league with a bang, and who then should have been shielded and used as trade bait.  Instead, we needed him, he was exposed, and now he probably wouldn't even warrant being included as a player TBN.  Sad to say, but that my two cents now.

Maybe we could try him at second base?

This is probably an idiotic question because there's no way I'm going to get a straight answer, but would you have been happier if the Westbrook trade hadn't been made, and the Cardinals had played August and September with Suppan and Lohse starting 40 percent of the games down the stretch?

 

10/03/2010 7:14 pm  #11


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

I think we have overlooked the value of Brad Thompson.  They went into 2010 without a guy who could bounce between bullpen, starter, St. Louis and Memphis.  You cant have just 5 starting pitchers in the whole system or you end up having to make stupid trades like the Ludwick deal.   I wouldnt have been happy with Suppan and Loshe but I am not happy that the Cardinals will likely not address the need for a starting right fielder like the one they traded.  Beening unhappy is a good theme for 2010.

 

10/03/2010 7:32 pm  #12


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

APRTW wrote:

I think we have overlooked the value of Brad Thompson.  They went into 2010 without a guy who could bounce between bullpen, starter, St. Louis and Memphis.  You cant have just 5 starting pitchers in the whole system or you end up having to make stupid trades like the Ludwick deal.   I wouldnt have been happy with Suppan and Loshe but I am not happy that the Cardinals will likely not address the need for a starting right fielder like the one they traded.  Beening unhappy is a good theme for 2010.

I dont know, AP. You wouldn't have gotten much more out of Thompson than you got out of Hawksworth. Right field and starting pitching are going to be their two biggest needs. They're probably going to settle for a JuanTino type of guy for the former, and the latter depends upon what happens with Westbrook. I'd bring him back, but he's going to ask for more money and years than the Cardinals are willing to offer.
After that, you look at second base, third base and the bullpen. You can live with Skippy's defense if he's going to hit .300, but not if he's going to hit .265 with little power and only a handful of stolen bases at the top of the lineup.
They're not going to go out and get a high-end closer, and I'm OK with what they've got setting up on the right side, but the left side needs to be addressed. Miller and Reyes were fine for most of the past two years, but they're getting along in age.

Incidentally, Ludwick went .214/6/26 with a .637 OPS for the Padres. I don't know what they gave up to get him, but I'm pretty sure they expected more production than that.

 

10/03/2010 8:13 pm  #13


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

So my choices are Reds, Phillies, Giants or Braves?

Geez-us. The only good thing about that is the Mets didn't make it.

 

10/03/2010 9:39 pm  #14


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

artie_fufkin wrote:

This is probably an idiotic question because there's no way I'm going to get a straight answer

Are you asking me?  If so, why on Earth would you think I wouldn't give you a straight answer?

     Thread Starter
 

10/03/2010 9:40 pm  #15


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

forsberg_us wrote:

Jay has value to the 2011 Cardinals as a 4th outfilder who can play all 3 OF positions.

If he's batting in the .230 range?

     Thread Starter
 

10/04/2010 8:30 am  #16


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

Max wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

Jay has value to the 2011 Cardinals as a 4th outfilder who can play all 3 OF positions.

If he's batting in the .230 range?

I don't believe Jay is a .230 hitter anymore than I believe he's a .380 hitter.

Jay is a career .301 hitter in the minor leagues.  Also, his progression when he remained in the same league from one year to the next suggests he understands how to make adjustments.  In 2007, he finished the season with Springfield and hit only .235.  The following year he started in Springfield and hit .306.  In 2009, he hit .281 at Memphis.  Before being called up this season he was hitting .321.

I think Jay will hit somewhere in the .280 range.  If so, I could totally see him filling a So Taguchi-like role on this team.  The biggest key is whether he can adapt to playing less than everyday.

 

10/04/2010 11:15 am  #17


Re: Braves lose, Padres win

I dont see how Jay is a much different outfielder than Skip.  I think he will slap the ball around and hit for a fairly high average.  I could see him being able to walk more, steal a base once in a while and get a few more doubles then Skip but not by much.  We found out that Skip's bat didnt project well in the outfield as a starter and unless Jay is some kind of awesome leadoff hitter I dont think his will project much better.  As Fors said he is a 4th outfielder.  The down side is that you would like your 4th outfielder to have more power for pinch hitting situations.

Last edited by APRTW (10/04/2010 11:20 am)

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]