You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



9/01/2016 3:40 pm  #1


Brandon Moss.

How much are we paying Moss to hit .261 with 25 HRs? 8.25 Million? That seems like a steal right now.

I know we're maybe taking it on the chin with a few dudes that just aren't coming through with much (Wainright, Leake coming to mind), but we can't be a very expensive offense collectively and there's a ton of power production for what we're not paying...

 

9/01/2016 3:43 pm  #2


Re: Brandon Moss.

Grichuk 520K
Moss 8.25M
Carpenter 6.25M
Gyorko 4 M
Piscotty 512K

I'm just saying, the amount of production we're getting out of 20 million dollars there is kind of scary. 

     Thread Starter
 

9/01/2016 3:50 pm  #3


Re: Brandon Moss.

Not to mention decent defense and great positional flexibility.

 

9/01/2016 10:13 pm  #4


Re: Brandon Moss.

To retain that group for 2017 it will cost over double that amount.

 

9/02/2016 7:10 am  #5


Re: Brandon Moss.

APIAD wrote:

To retain that group for 2017 it will cost over double that amount.

It's not as bad as you might think. Next season salaries

Carpenter- $10M
Gyorko- $6M
Grichuk- $530K
Piscotty- $520K

Moss will probably get $12-15M. So, that same group would cost about $30M. That's not bad

 

9/09/2016 11:01 am  #6


Re: Brandon Moss.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/09/free-agent-stock-watch-brandon-moss.html

Interesting article.  Id disagree with the idea that moss will not get a QO.  Im of the opinion that there is no such thing as a bad one year deal.  The Cardinals would likely be over paying him but would have no long term risk.  Also imo it might help the cards resign him at a lower cost.  QO attachment decrease value.

 

9/09/2016 8:08 pm  #7


Re: Brandon Moss.

APIAD wrote:

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/09/free-agent-stock-watch-brandon-moss.html

Interesting article.  Id disagree with the idea that moss will not get a QO.  Im of the opinion that there is no such thing as a bad one year deal.  The Cardinals would likely be over paying him but would have no long term risk.  Also imo it might help the cards resign him at a lower cost.  QO attachment decrease value.

I agree. The only reason they wouldn't make a QO is if they don't want him back and would be worried he'd accept. Assuming they want him back, there's absolutely no reason not to tender him.

 

9/10/2016 11:43 am  #8


Re: Brandon Moss.

The article and many like it seem so wrong that i wonder where many writers get their info.  I follow the team daily, id assume anyone who does would see this as a misstatement.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]