You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



5/27/2011 4:14 pm  #26


Re: NOT a clean hit

APRTW wrote:

Max, you always take the unpopular angle and try and defend it.  I understand you like to debate but why dont you try and back up your position or at least clearly state your position.  If you dont like the current rules of MLB then why dont you explain what could be done to make them better.  Also what punishment would be put in place to discourage such acts.  If you go with the wording you mentioned above "estimation of the umpire" you open the same can of worms the NFL did and that has needed to be adjusted weekly.  It has been unpopular with player, fans and coachs.  Most the time it is ignored and the fine is paid.  It also, in most cases doesnt have an effect on the game being played because the league will hand out punishment on player the refs didnt see.  I think if you actually put thought into how the rule would be worded and enforced you would see why not changing the game is the best option.

you make it sound like i sit around dreaming up unpopular positions for the shear enjoyment of arguing about them.  everything you ask me to do in this post i have already done.  you don't like my solution.  fine.  keep the rules the way they are and allow a full grown man to launch himself into a blindsided man and call it entertainment, tradition, hard-nosed baseball, or whatever you like.

 

5/27/2011 4:17 pm  #27


Re: NOT a clean hit

APRTW wrote:

Max wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

If a home plate collision offends you that much, there's always women's tennis. Enjoy.

If I did that some move to someone on the street, I assume I could be arrested, found guilty and sent to jail.  Just because baseball says it's legal, doesn't make it OK in my eyes.

So you are comparing shoulder blocking an unknowing man walking down the street to two people agreeing to play a game that they know can involve contact?  One that they get paid well to play?  If I threw a baseball at a random guys head who is walking down the street I would also be taken to jail.  This may be your worst attempt to make a point yet.

it's not Ok to throw at a guy's head in baseball, either.

in fact, i seem to recall there was a case in baseball where a player was charged with assault.  did i make that up or does anyone else remember it?

     Thread Starter
 

5/27/2011 4:21 pm  #28


Re: NOT a clean hit

alz wrote:

You have Posey on your fantasy team don't you?

LOL.  No!  That's a good take, though. 

I was thinking about that last week, how fantasy sports have changed sports journalism.  Baseball news is on a three-phase cycle: games in progress, wrap-ups, injury reports.  If you open a page like Yahoo mlb at just the right phase, virtually every story will be about who is injured and how long he'll be out.

     Thread Starter
 

5/27/2011 4:27 pm  #29


Re: NOT a clean hit

APRTW wrote:

Baseball's unwritten system for checks and balances is interesting and proven over time to be effective.  The players and managers see this as a clean hit.  No retaliation we be had.  However if Posey would have allowed a sliding lane the other players would have saw it as dirty and there would be retailation.  If that was the case then Cousins would be puttting his own teammates in harms way.  Many have voiced the opinion that throwing at hitters in retaliation is unsafe and may cause injuries.  I think it is the other way around.  It makes everyone play the game the right way and likely reduces injuries.


ESPN reported that Cousins was in tears when asked about the hit and if you saw the video the first thing he did was try and help Posey.  He wasnt trying to hurt the guy.

i will say that when i first saw the video i thought that posey was out in front of the basepath, not in it.  after seeing it a few times, i realize he blocked the path with his left leg--not a very smart move.  when i watch the video, i see cousins veering out of the basepath, seemingly aiming his body at posey's head.  that's probably not quite right either, as the collision seems to be with posey's shoulder. 

in the final analysis, physical contact and intent to injure is the object of some sports, notably boxing.  that's not the case in baseball.  there's almost no reason for players to ever touch each other, except on, say, a tag.  so, given the object of baseball, which is a finesse sport, i would prefer to see the 'hard-nosed' parts removed.   they're not necessary to the game, and certainly not to my enjoyment of it.

     Thread Starter
 

5/27/2011 4:31 pm  #30


Re: NOT a clean hit

alz wrote:

And Max, there are some points you're bringing up here that I do find a bit silly.

My view was bordering on a massive violation of freedom of speech/religion, and frankly... stupid.

i thought i supported your comment about the guy???

     Thread Starter
 

5/28/2011 7:52 pm  #31


Re: NOT a clean hit

FUCKING LARUSSA!

All I ever wanted to do was to stake out an unpopular position and then argue it like a pissant without ever supporting what I said or offering an alternative, and what does La Russa do?  He goes out and gives a public interview stating pretty much the same things I did a day or two before.  He even goes so far as to say Cardinal runners are instructed NOT to collide with the catcher in an attempt to dislodge the ball, in order to avoid injury to both catcher and runner.  "So, I would be in favor of discussing that rule where the catcher always gives the runner something to slide to. And you teach the baserunner - I don't want any of our baserunners running into the catcher . . . . It's not worth the consequences of you getting busted up. . . . If you beat the throw to the plate, you're safe. If the ball beats you you're out. That's what I mean. You can't go out there to collide with the catcher."

God DAMMIT what an asshole!

La Russa would like to discuss rule change to protect catchers, runners
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/87a48f7c-88b7-11e0-b172-001a4bcf6878.html

Last edited by Max (5/28/2011 8:00 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

5/28/2011 9:23 pm  #32


Re: NOT a clean hit

Because LaRussa's opinions are alway mainstream?

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]