You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



6/01/2011 10:46 pm  #51


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

And that's the game.

 

6/01/2011 10:47 pm  #52


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Guess Franklin's tipping pitches again.

Either that or he still sucks.

 

6/01/2011 10:48 pm  #53


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Also guarantees that they will lose the season series to a team that will win 75 games. Westbrook, Salas and Franklin deserve a big round of applause.

     Thread Starter
 

6/01/2011 10:50 pm  #54


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

I'm so pissed off that I can't stop writing. You know, Salas sucked tonight. And Franklin is awful. But Jake fucking Westbrook is the culprit here. You cannot cough up a 3-0 lead with Lincecum opposing you. You just can't. Nut the fuck up and make some pitches. I don't think I've hated a pitcher more since Todd Wellemeyer in 2009.

     Thread Starter
 

6/01/2011 10:54 pm  #55


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

forsberg_us wrote:

Tyler Greene cleanup hitter.

This is what happens when your team sucks so bad defensively that you have to sub out half of them by the 6th inning.

This is what happens when you have to ask for 2 innings from Ryan Franklin in a tight game.

I am amazed and as happy as a pig shit that my doom and gloom predictions that his career is over appear to be wrong, but it's not like he was lights out, even in his heyday.

 

6/01/2011 10:56 pm  #56


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Goddammit I hate Skip Schumaker.

     Thread Starter
 

6/01/2011 11:00 pm  #57


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

OK, this is too easy. Was DeWitt too cheap to pay the electric bill last month?

 

6/01/2011 11:01 pm  #58


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

forsberg_us wrote:

Guess Franklin's tipping pitches again.

Either that or he still sucks.

C'mon.  I have complained about Franklin worse than most of us, but I think it's not far-fetched to say he is getting back o track, but that 2 innings is too much to ask of him.

 

6/01/2011 11:02 pm  #59


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

forsberg_us wrote:

Tyler Greene cleanup hitter.

This is what happens when your team sucks so bad defensively that you have to sub out half of them by the 6th inning.

this is what happens when you rely on skip schumaker for a clutch hit, two nights in a row.

 

6/01/2011 11:04 pm  #60


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

delay???

this would be an amazing stroke of luck if we are allowed to pick this game up, tied at the top of the 11th.

 

6/01/2011 11:08 pm  #61


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

It's not far fetched to expect a major league pitcher to be able to record outs against this putrid Giants lineup.

The delay is for a bank of lights that went out. I assume they'll figure out a way to fix it.

 

6/01/2011 11:15 pm  #62


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

"I think it's not far-fetched to say he is getting back o track, but that 2 innings is too much to ask of him."

He was throwing pus down the middle of the plate again, Max.

 

6/01/2011 11:17 pm  #63


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

forsberg_us wrote:

It's not far fetched to expect a major league pitcher to be able to record outs against this putrid Giants lineup.

my bottom line is that, while it sucks to score five earned runs off of lincecum and not win, the disappointment begins with anyone who thinks westbrook is anything other than a bottom of the rotation starter who might keep you in a game and might not.

Last edited by Max (6/01/2011 11:18 pm)

 

6/01/2011 11:18 pm  #64


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Sixteen hits to the Giants. LOL.

     Thread Starter
 

6/01/2011 11:18 pm  #65


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

WE GOT IT, NOMAR! THE GIANTS DON'T PANIC! THEY'VE BEEN THERE BEFORE! THEY DON'T QUIT! THEY'RE THE DEFENDING WORLD CHAMPS FOR A REASON! YOU HAVE TO PUT THEM AWAY WHEN YOU GET THE CHANCE! HOW MANY MORE CLICHES CAN YOU USE?

 

6/01/2011 11:20 pm  #66


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Good night, fellas. I'm going to light my Westbrook voodoo doll on fire. Have I told you guys lately how much I hate that guy? I really hate that guy.

     Thread Starter
 

6/01/2011 11:20 pm  #67


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Glad we waited for that.

 

6/01/2011 11:37 pm  #68


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Max wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

It's not far fetched to expect a major league pitcher to be able to record outs against this putrid Giants lineup.

my bottom line is that, while it sucks to score five earned runs off of lincecum and not win, the disappointment begins with anyone who thinks westbrook is anything other than a bottom of the rotation starter who might keep you in a game and might not.

I haven't seen anyone making excuses for Westbrook. But Westbrook came into this game with a 2.11 ERA in his last 6 starts that didn't include a rain delay. He's been the team's 3rd best starter for more than a month. Having said that, I agree 100% with TK, that he has to nut up and win this one and he didn't do that.

Franklin's only on the team because of a misguided sense of loyalty and a foolish belief that a guy who throws absolute junk with limited control is going to suddenly figure it out. They should have left well enough alone. Franklin got a couple of meaningful outs yesterday and the kool-aid drinkers got to write a feel good story about his perseerverance. They went back to the well and tomorrow the story will be Franklin sucks again.

 

6/02/2011 1:26 am  #69


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

well, pardon me for rooting for franklin.  if i am a kool aid drinker, then so be it.  he had four good appearances in a row until he got sent out for a second inning tonight.  if he becomes an effective one inning pitcher then it's like getting two roster spots: his, and the guy who has been playing his role on the bullpen.  maybe i should have stuck with my earlier opinion and said he's done.  he needs to be taken on drive in the country a la SNL spoof of ross perot ditching his veep candidate. 

on the other hand, i saw the highlights from his 3k performance yesterday and i thought that the curve that got whiteside looking looked nasty, although franklin might have gotten a break on the call.  the next two guys swung and missed at strike three, and you can't ask for much more than that.  so, it's not like ALL i did was read the boxscore, drink some kool-aid, and surrender to wishful thinking--almost all, perhaps, but not quite.

 

6/02/2011 9:40 am  #70


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

First, start with the premise that I don't think Franklin's an effective one inning pitcher.  But even if that's your premise, then he's still wasting roster space because his role isn't that of a single inning pitcher.

Franklin is, at best, the 4th best RH relief pitcher behind Salas, Sanchez and Motte.  Salas is the 9th inning guy.  Sanchez the 8th.  Motte the 7th.  Where does Franklin and his one inning fit?  Answer: it doesn't. 

Even if you assume that Batista is the designated Brad Thompson, long-relief guy, then Franklin is the second long guy. Especially in a game like last night when the game goes into extra innings.  The LOOGYs aren't going to eat innings.  Motte isn't going to eat innings.  Right now that's Franklin's job, and if your premise is that he's only a one inning pitcher then he isn't qualified to do his job.

IMO, Franklin and Schumaker are basically the same guy.  Both are performing in roles for which they aren't qualified, nor are they the organization's best option.  But they're "Larussa guys" who willingly took on their current roles when the team didn't have anyone better, so now it would apparently be "unfair" to remove them.  Never mind that the team has better options.  Never mind that this team is in first place and is in a position schedule-wise to probably bury the opposition within the division over the next 6 or so weeks.  Never mind that neither Franklin or Schumaker will be here next year when their contracts expire and the team elects not to overpay for less than mediocre talent.  For now, let's keep running them out there regardless of the results because ...

 

6/02/2011 3:46 pm  #71


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

I see the tinker man will give Cruz a start at third tonight (6/2) . He has played 3rd in the minors .

 

6/02/2011 4:17 pm  #72


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

forsberg_us wrote:

First, start with the premise that I don't think Franklin's an effective one inning pitcher.  But even if that's your premise, then he's still wasting roster space because his role isn't that of a single inning pitcher.

Franklin is, at best, the 4th best RH relief pitcher behind Salas, Sanchez and Motte.  Salas is the 9th inning guy.  Sanchez the 8th.  Motte the 7th.  Where does Franklin and his one inning fit?  Answer: it doesn't. 

Even if you assume that Batista is the designated Brad Thompson, long-relief guy, then Franklin is the second long guy. Especially in a game like last night when the game goes into extra innings.  The LOOGYs aren't going to eat innings.  Motte isn't going to eat innings.  Right now that's Franklin's job, and if your premise is that he's only a one inning pitcher then he isn't qualified to do his job.

IMO, Franklin and Schumaker are basically the same guy.  Both are performing in roles for which they aren't qualified, nor are they the organization's best option.  But they're "Larussa guys" who willingly took on their current roles when the team didn't have anyone better, so now it would apparently be "unfair" to remove them.  Never mind that the team has better options.  Never mind that this team is in first place and is in a position schedule-wise to probably bury the opposition within the division over the next 6 or so weeks.  Never mind that neither Franklin or Schumaker will be here next year when their contracts expire and the team elects not to overpay for less than mediocre talent.  For now, let's keep running them out there regardless of the results because ...

you're preaching to the choir, fors.  even when franklin was our closer and was converting saves with regularity--an all-star, for chrissake!--i was not convinced that he was our best option, or if he was, that he was good enough.

but franklin has no trade value, never will, and he has no value at all to the team if he can't be a reliable one inning pitcher.  sanchez or salas have trade value, and as much as i like them--i liked ludwick, too--i think that one or both will be made available if that's what moz feels is required.  you're right that we only need three one-inning righties, one of them being the closer, and franklin is currently 4th best.  but if he becomes reliable again, or his version of reliable, or just 'good enough', then that frees up one of the other three for a trade.

 

6/02/2011 7:17 pm  #73


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

tkihshbt wrote:

I'm so pissed off that I can't stop writing. You know, Salas sucked tonight. And Franklin is awful. But Jake fucking Westbrook is the culprit here. You cannot cough up a 3-0 lead with Lincecum opposing you. You just can't. Nut the fuck up and make some pitches. I don't think I've hated a pitcher more since Todd Wellemeyer in 2009.

I thought McCellan was the Cardinals worst starter?

 

6/02/2011 8:34 pm  #74


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Wellemeyer doesn't bug me at all.  Ya know, you claim a reliever who has been DFA by the Royals and decide to let him start games for you, and anything you get is like found money. 

What gets me are the Brett Tomko's, K1p Wells's, Jake Westbrook's.  And even then it's not the pitcher that bugs me but the management.  They go and pay real money for a middle of the road pitcher, expecting a middle of the rotation starter, and then they act all disappointed when he turns out to be a bottom of the rotation pitcher.  Of those three, I think Westbrook is the best by a lot, but we also gave up a lot to get him. 

Overall I am not too worried about starting pitching, though.  Unless we experience more injuries or fatigue, this is shaping up to be the strongest rotation since 2005.

 

6/02/2011 8:52 pm  #75


Re: 6/1 Gamecrap

Max wrote:

What gets me are the Brett Tomko's, K1p Wells's, Jake Westbrook's.

Westbrook is a system fit. He's a sinkerball pitcher who presumably does exactly what Duncan tells him. Think Jeff Suppan.

The thing about guys like Tomko and Wells is that they aren't that different from Lohse.  Lohse always had pretty good stuff, but was largely mediocre until he got to St. Louis,  Lohse has obviously been willing to listen to the constructive criticism that Tomko and Wells couldn't be bothered with. That was what was frustrating about Tomko and Wells--at times they could be dominant, but then they'd underachieve.  You could include Marquis in that category.

Last edited by forsberg_us (6/02/2011 8:58 pm)

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]