You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



9/03/2011 11:14 am  #1


30/100/100/.300

34/84/90/.294

and headed to his worst season ever.  My hunch is that his payday is not in jeopardy.

 

9/04/2011 6:11 am  #2


Re: 30/100/100/.300

They're cribbing from our posts again:

Pujols inches closer to 30-100-.300

BY DERRICK GOOLD • dgoold@post-dispatch.com > 314-340-8285 |

Posted: Sunday, September 4, 2011 12:35


Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/article_654ba15e-a00b-5985-be4d-8a1957dd3b16.html#ixzz1WytUQDRa

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/article_654ba15e-a00b-5985-be4d-8a1957dd3b16.html

     Thread Starter
 

9/10/2011 4:46 pm  #3


Re: 30/100/100/.300

34/87/91/.298

Amazing that he has made it this close after his protracted slow.

Interesting that the one that seems least likely to be attained now is RBIs.  That's unexpected.

     Thread Starter
 

9/10/2011 9:14 pm  #4


Re: 30/100/100/.300

All those Dps killed his RBIs.

 

9/12/2011 7:56 am  #5


Re: 30/100/100/.300

He's two bombs with a runner or two on from fixing that RBI column. Speaking of.... he hasn't went yard since September 1st!!! WTF IS GOING ON HERE!!!

 

9/12/2011 9:39 pm  #6


Re: 30/100/100/.300

HR/RBI/R/BA

35/92/94/.298

This is gonna be a GREAT September!

     Thread Starter
 

9/17/2011 11:37 pm  #7


Re: 30/100/100/.300

35/93/95/.301

I would have thought that batting .300 was going to be the nigh on impossible mark to reach way back when, earlier in this season, when Pujols's career as a marquis player was over.

     Thread Starter
 

9/18/2011 8:16 pm  #8


Re: 30/100/100/.300

What contract terms would you offer him?

 

9/18/2011 8:35 pm  #9


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Same thing I would have offered him last year: $150/5, with performance triggered options for another 5 years at $30 million per . . . but this year with a "pretty please with sugar on it."

     Thread Starter
 

9/18/2011 9:10 pm  #10


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Max wrote:

Same thing I would have offered him last year: $150/5, with performance triggered options for another 5 years at $30 million per . . . but this year with a "pretty please with sugar on it."

I wouldnt go quite that high.  125/5-135/5 is the range I would sit at.  That is inbetween Arod and Howard.  If he walked I would feel like the Cardinals made an honest effort at that price.  With Howard getting 125/5 I think it sets the bar for a starting poiint.

 

9/18/2011 9:15 pm  #11


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Also if I was any team other then the Cardinals shopping for a dh or 1st baseman I would target Fielder first.  He may be fat but he is 4 years younger.

 

9/18/2011 9:20 pm  #12


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Well, who was that in the booth who just answered without a blink, "No" Pujols will not be a Cardinal next season?  I think he was right, that the Cards ownership group is a very savvy bunch of business minded people, and they aren't going to pay Pujols more than they reckon will be a good business move.  So, my brain tells me that we have been set up over the past few years to see Pujols walk away and sign somewhere else.  The only thing I think that can save it will be something splashy, as I said last year, and I don't think $135/5 gets it done. 

So, what I would do is offer enough to keep him a Cardinal, but with the lowest guaranteed payday. I think the only thing splashy enough to keep Pujols is $150/5, but that's just my hunch.  In any case, I doubt DeWitt does that, and I tend to agree with the guy in the booth, Pujols won't be a Cardinal next year.

Last edited by Max (9/18/2011 9:21 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

9/18/2011 9:47 pm  #13


Re: 30/100/100/.300

I still don't know if five guaranteed years gets it done.
And I'm not sure Berkman long-term is a good sign. He has 12 extra base hits in the last seven weeks.

 

9/18/2011 10:04 pm  #14


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Berkman is on record to have said that he is willing to return to the Cardinals on a one term deal.  The hold up tot hat is that he wants paid what he is worth.  This year he is being paid 8 million.  I would say based off his production in 2011 he is worth 12million. 

I am unsure of the 5 years on Pujols.  I think it is fair.  I think the Pujols contract will come down to if another teamis willing to pay over a reasonable amount.  I think th Cardinals are willing to pay market value.

 

9/18/2011 11:02 pm  #15


Re: 30/100/100/.300

I think that if Pujols truly wants to stay a Cardinal, that five years will do it IF the AAV is huge and splashy: "PUJOLS SIGNS FOR HIGHEST AAV!!!", AND IF the option years total up to something that is earth moving.

     Thread Starter
 

9/19/2011 7:21 am  #16


Re: 30/100/100/.300

I'll tell you the amount of "fabricated horseshit" that I'm starting to hear from the common fan about Pujols contract is becoming silly.

I heard one person this weekend try to tell me that Pujols wanted 250 million for 10 years. The "reason" the deal didn't go through is because the Cardinals offered him 250 million for 7/8 years instead.....

I'm pretty sure I need to stop going to the sports bar, the conversation is going to get me in a fight.

 

9/19/2011 2:30 pm  #17


Re: 30/100/100/.300

The last report was the Bob Nightingale USA Today story which reported that the Cardinals offered 9 years, $195M and that Pujols wanted 10 years, at least $230M.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/nl/cardinals/story/2011-09-06/Albert-Pujols-contract-drama-heats-up-again-with-Cardinals/50288344/1?loc=interstitialskip

The interesting thing is the "at least" qualifier.  If the story is true, the Cardinals' offer was about $22M per year.  Depending on how close Pujols' demand was to $230M, they may not have been that far off.

I don't think Pujols wants splashy.  I think he wants this to be his last contract.

 

9/19/2011 2:44 pm  #18


Re: 30/100/100/.300

"If the story is true, the Cardinals' offer was about $22M per year.  Depending on how close Pujols' demand was to $230M, they may not have been that far off."

Looking at it optimistically, I don't think the Cardinals will let Pujols walk when they're apart by a million dollars a year, and I believe Pujols when he says he wants to stay in St. Louis.
The day after the season ends, if I'm DeWitt, I call Albert into my office and say "I'm willing to split the difference if you're willing to sign this piece of paper."

 

9/19/2011 2:59 pm  #19


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Fantastic read fors, and I will say that if they are really that close, maybe we'll get the break. Is it wrong that I don't want the Cardinals in Post-season just so they can sit down with Albert and punch this thing out?

Pujols wanted a 10 year deal, one of those just got played out. Can they sign him for 9 Years//207 million (23 Mil a season) or maybe have to up it to 216 (24 mil a season)? You're talking about adding a total of 12-21 million to your deal to get him for the next 9 seasons... It's not that much more, if he wants to clip the 23 AAV of Morneau (and really, shouldn't he command that?), that's not crazy. 30 would be crazy.

I'll be very dissappointed if they were that close, and couldn't get it done.

 

9/19/2011 4:31 pm  #20


Re: 30/100/100/.300

"Fantastic read fors, and I will say that if they are really that close, maybe we'll get the break. Is it wrong that I don't want the Cardinals in Post-season just so they can sit down with Albert and punch this thing out?"

I've thought that as well, but having made it this close, I still think Pujols tries the free agent market--if for no other reason than to see what his market value really is. 

I think this is going to play out very similar to the Cliff Lee deal, with Pujols turning down a contract worth more money and maybe even more years to return to St. Louis.  But both he and his agent are smart enough to know the presence of another offer forces the Cardinals to maximize their offer, and I think that's exactly what they hope to do.


"Can they sign him for 9 Years//207 million (23 Mil a season) or maybe have to up it to 216 (24 mil a season)?"

I suspect the Pujols camp would accept that, but I also suspect the Cardinal camp is looking to shave a year off of their offer as well.  If they were willing to offer 9 guaranteed, then I suspect they'll be offering 8.  Having said that, it certainly seems there's room to bridge the differences.  Between deferred money, front loading the contract, and maybe making the 9th year an option, you'd think the parties could find middle ground. 

Of course, there's always the possibility to some team steps forward and makes an offer way over market value.  There's rumors that Florida may try to make a splash for their new stadium.  Personally, I don't think it makes much sense because unless they think Pujols instantly makes them better than Philadelphia and/or Atlanta, I doubt that the Marlins fans are going to fill the stadium day-in and day-out to watch Pujols play out a long term deal.  Even if he approaches all of the milestones you think he will approach, the attendance boost will be isolated unless the team is winning.  Sure, people would come to see him hit #700, but if the team isn't very good, will anyone be there to see him hit #672?  That would be a lot of money to hand out to watch a player reach an occasional milestone (and there's no guarantee he doesn't reach those milestones on the road, assuming he reaches them at all).

Last edited by forsberg_us (9/19/2011 4:32 pm)

 

9/19/2011 7:17 pm  #21


Re: 30/100/100/.300

forsberg_us wrote:

I don't think Pujols wants splashy.

I hope you are right.  I won't say that my vantage point from a hotel in Manado gives me any special insight into the process.  But what I do read over and over again is that Pujols has wanted to sign this extension for a long time, and it is the Cardinals that have been unwilling, and then offering a super lowball contract.  DeWitt has played chicken with Pujols, and it's looking like deWitt lost.  The question is how long and hard Pujols will hold his toes over the fire before making a decision.  It would only be human at this point if Pujols had the desire to make DeWitt pay, in one form or other.

     Thread Starter
 

9/21/2011 7:34 am  #22


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Three more RBI's and a run until AP hits 30/100/100/.300

What a great job by Pujols to end up with that line after that start....

 

9/22/2011 4:49 pm  #23


Re: 30/100/100/.300

30 HR- check

100 R- check

.300 avg.- check (at present)

100 RBI- 2 to go

 

9/22/2011 5:33 pm  #24


Re: 30/100/100/.300

From my vantage point, of a tree in the middle of the forest in Sulawesi: Go Cards, Go Pujols!!!

     Thread Starter
 

9/25/2011 3:21 pm  #25


Re: 30/100/100/.300

Stuck on 98 RBIs.  I kinda suspect he gets those, but he's in a mini-slump and his BA has fallen to .301.  So I could easily see his BA falling below .300 yet.

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]