You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/15/2012 11:02 am  #26


Re: Rams

alz wrote:

and now are banking their hopes on Flynn (Green Bay's backup, who Rodgers says can be a top 15 quarterback in the league.... can't wait for that...). They are in the Manning talks, but just dumped their best WR for punching some bitch in a club (again, this is a problem for Marshall... but Marshall is worth more than a pair of 3rd rounders, and if we had anything resembling a quarterback during his time here, his stats would have been off the damned charts....) so I can't see Manning really wanting to commit to a loser organization that nobody seems to want to sign with.

I dont think Flynn is a bad gamble but it is easy to look good as a QB when you are on the best roster in the league. 

Also Marshall needs to chill.  If he tries to hit on of these big midwestern girls he might have his handsfull.

 

3/15/2012 11:25 am  #27


Re: Rams

APRTW wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

I'll give you franchise QB over franchise LT, but I'm taking LT over RB or WR every time.

Having said that, never take a guard, center or RT before the middle of the first round, and even then, they have to be an exceptional talent.

What if you have a left handed QB?

Then you draft a new QB because only idiots throw with their left hand





{Cue "Up Yours" from Artie in 3 ... 2 ...}

 

3/15/2012 11:54 am  #28


Re: Rams

APRTW wrote:

It isnt much better for the Vikings.

Au contrere, mon frer. The Vikings are two years removed from playing in the NFC championship game. The Raiders are 45-101 since they last played in a playoff game, and set a record by losing at least 11 games seven seasons in a row. There's no rebuilding. There's not even building. It's like trying to prop up a tool shed on stilts in the middle of a swamp. Only a complete idiot would stick with them after this decade of utter futility.

 

3/15/2012 11:56 am  #29


Re: Rams

"only idiots throw with their left hand"

See previous message ...

 

3/15/2012 12:01 pm  #30


Re: Rams

alz wrote:

But there's Bradford.... With everything wrong with the Rams, they have always had a QB that they expect greatness from. Whether it's acheived or not, the Rams went after Trent Green, landed an amazing find in Kurt Warner, had a pretty serviceable quarterback in Bulger (for a while at least), and then drafted Bradford number 1 overall. Sadly, I'm a quarterback guy. I love watching the passing game, although I'm a walking contradiction in that I hate the new rules against defensive hitting. To me I think that's kind of cheap.

There's also Fisher. Everything wrong with the Rams on the field can be directly pointed to Coaching and the Front Office. Well the Front office gave Fisher the keys to the kingdom, and control over personel as well as coaching. He's overhauling everything.

Lastly, you also have a pretty damned amazing set of NFL drafts coming. To go from 2 to 6 (four spots), you get the next two first round picks from Washington (of all teams), and you'll still have your own first rounders in the next 2 drafts as well. You also get a VERY HIGH ADDITIONAL second round pick (now with #2 and #6 in the second round) for this deal and Washington was high enough that is really right on par with a later 1st round pick. Aside from the ownership moving the franchise, there's very little negative aspect from St. Louis.

I wouldn't be shocked to see the Rams leave with another Lombardi trophy. There's a lot of success you can have over the next 2 drafts thanks to the RG3 deal, ESPECIALLY with Fisher running shit.

It all sounds good, but Bradford can't do anything from his back or throwing to a bunch of practice squad caliber receivers.  Hopefully Fisher improves things, but I remember that Spagnuolo was one of "can't-miss coordinators" when he came to St. Louis and promptly went 10-38.  And draft picks are only as good as the players selected.  The Rams' draft history sucks balls.  I know it wasn't this group, but the horrid draft history extends back about 3-4 coaches/GMs, so until I actually see production on the field, it means very little.

Combine all that with the likelihood that they move the franchise in 3 years, I'll be spending my football money in Columbia watching Mizzou play SEC football.

 

3/15/2012 12:28 pm  #31


Re: Rams

APRTW wrote:

alz wrote:

and now are banking their hopes on Flynn (Green Bay's backup, who Rodgers says can be a top 15 quarterback in the league.... can't wait for that...). They are in the Manning talks, but just dumped their best WR for punching some bitch in a club (again, this is a problem for Marshall... but Marshall is worth more than a pair of 3rd rounders, and if we had anything resembling a quarterback during his time here, his stats would have been off the damned charts....) so I can't see Manning really wanting to commit to a loser organization that nobody seems to want to sign with.

I dont think Flynn is a bad gamble but it is easy to look good as a QB when you are on the best roster in the league. 

Also Marshall needs to chill.  If he tries to hit on of these big midwestern girls he might have his handsfull.

I'm not sure what the take on Marshall is. Here's the facts as I know them.

Marshall was out with his wife in a night club environment until after 3:00 AM. Nothing good can come of this.
There was some type of altercation between Marshall and another man inside the club.
There was another altercation outside where Marshall alledgedly landed one pretty square into a girl's eye.
At some point his wife was hit in the head with a bottle of some kind and was taken to the hospital after the events.

Depending on the order and details of the last 3 events, which I don't really know, my view can change drastically. All I've read is that Marshall punched a woman in the face, but why was he not charged... It's the second time in as many days where I've raged at the injustice of an article enough to read comments and seen someone posting details that aren't covered in an article. The first was the White Neighborhood Watch Captain fatally shooting a 17 year old black resident armed with Arizona Iced Tea and a bag of Skittles. Later in the comments you read that cops have been quoted as having him say, "I screamed for someone to come help me, and nobody did." He was not charged, nor arrested. Much to the ire of the Yahoo News Group apparently... I have to ask why he wasn't arrested, and I have to assume it's because the police did not have enough evidence to arrest him for a crime. Whether that's because the entire police force is nothing but white racists, or because there are details I wasn't privy to that are being omitted is the guess there, and I'm moving with the latter. I can build a situation where the guy shouldn't have allowed a close confrontation to occur at all, rather stayed in his car. However he made that mistake, and if there was assault, and he was getting smashed with a full can of Ice Tea (which is like a 40)... I can see the gun coming into play, the unfortunate shooting, and no arrest happening too. Which story is right? No idea, but I can't rush to judgement.

Big long story, relates to Marshall because one of the tidbits overlooked is that last detail. His wife was hit in the head with a bottle and needed to go to the hospital. How'd that play in? That's important. If my wife wants to fight, I'll stay out of it. If someone clubs her with a bottle, I'm stepping in. I don't care if I do knock some woman's teeth out, I'm not going to stand by while someone treats my wife like a pinata...

So I don't know if Marshall was being Marshall. I know he wasn't charged, and given his history, I think he would have been if he was in the wrong. I know it was way too goddamned late for him to be out clubbing. I know that regardless of his guilt, this may get him another visit to Goodell on the Conduct Policy, and another suspension (multiple offender, could be a big one.... like 4 games....)

Beyond that, I dunno.

 

3/15/2012 12:46 pm  #32


Re: Rams

forsberg_us wrote:

The Rams' draft history sucks balls.  I know it wasn't this group, but the horrid draft history extends back about 3-4 coaches/GMs, so until I actually see production on the field, it means very little.

I am going to give Fisher the benefit of the doubt on this. He has never drafted a single player for the St. Louis Rams. He could have easily went another way with that number 2 pick. He could have traded Bradford, and used the #2 on RG3, and the Bradford returns to build the rest of the team. He believes that Bradford is a much better long term solution then RG3. Considering what other teams were willing to give him for RG3, it speaks volumes to me that he feels he has something better already under contract...

Bradford took a lot of sacks, but I think a premier wide receiver would lower that number more then a premier blocker would. You need 5 premier offensive lineman, a running back/fullback, and tight end to ensure excellent protection... You need 1-2 wide receivers who can get open to ensure your average OL only has to block for 2.5 - 3.5 seconds, instead of the 5+ they needed to before...

Now ... the counter is that an OL also greatly helps your running game, a WR doesn't add much to that. Or does it? If you have a WR out there that you are committing 1-2 defenders on, they are not sitting in the box.

Last edited by alz (3/15/2012 12:46 pm)

 

3/15/2012 1:00 pm  #33


Re: Rams

"He could have traded Bradford, and used the #2 on RG3, and the Bradford returns to build the rest of the team. He believes that Bradford is a much better long term solution then RG3. Considering what other teams were willing to give him for RG3, it speaks volumes to me that he feels he has something better already under contract..."

I heard that mentioned a couple of times, but I'm not sure it was a real an option as suggested.  Bradford was drafted only 2 years ago and I seem to remember he signed a 6 year deal.  That's 4 years of pro-rated signing bonus that would have fallen on the Rams' salary cap, and the bonus was in the old system before the rookie limits were in place, so my guess is the number was quite large. 

Plus Bradford's contract salary is much higher than RG3's will be under the new system

I'm not saying that there aren't teams that would have had interest in Bradford, but I think when the salary cap issues are taken into consideration, I think it made a lot more sense to trade the pick and I think the pick had more value.


"Bradford took a lot of sacks, but I think a premier wide receiver would lower that number more then a premier blocker would."

At this point the Rams have neither.

 

3/15/2012 1:10 pm  #34


Re: Rams

Well, in either event, I hope the Rams have some quality football to bring to the table. God fucking knows I'm not going to see it from Miami any time soon.

 

3/15/2012 1:27 pm  #35


Re: Rams

artie_fufkin wrote:

APRTW wrote:

It isnt much better for the Vikings.

Au contrere, mon frer. The Vikings are two years removed from playing in the NFC championship game. The Raiders are 45-101 since they last played in a playoff game, and set a record by losing at least 11 games seven seasons in a row. There's no rebuilding. There's not even building. It's like trying to prop up a tool shed on stilts in the middle of a swamp. Only a complete idiot would stick with them after this decade of utter futility.

I bet the 2012 Raiders finish with a better record then the 2012 Vikings.

 

3/15/2012 1:36 pm  #36


Re: Rams

alz wrote:

Marshall was out with his wife in a night club environment until after 3:00 AM. Nothing good can come of this.........
I know it was way too goddamned late for him to be out clubbing.

What is "clubbing"?  Is it like on TV were they play a bunch of crappy hiphop music and dry hump eachother?  That just doesnt seem like something anyone over 25 should be allowed to do.  Surely not someone who is married, even if their wife is along.  And then if you get "clubbed" while "clubbing" shouldnt you have expected it.

 

3/15/2012 1:40 pm  #37


Re: Rams

"I bet the 2012 Raiders finish with a better record then the 2012 Vikings."

They probably will, but my point is you've never had someone ask you what team you root for, respond "the Vikings," and then have to brace yourself for the inevitable wiseass response. I've been answering "Raiders" for the past 10 years, and for once I'd just like to hear dead air afterwards.

 

3/15/2012 1:51 pm  #38


Re: Rams

"What is "clubbing"?

It used to be what Eskimo hunters did to baby seals until Bridget Bardot protested by threatening to do another one of her shitty softcore-porn-disguised-as-French-art movies, but I believe the politically-correct definition in the current vernacular is "out past your bedtime in an urban environment."

 

3/15/2012 1:56 pm  #39


Re: Rams

"White Neighborhood Watch Captain"

Interesting term. I believe the title used to be known as "Grand Wizard."

 

3/15/2012 2:35 pm  #40


Re: Rams

artie_fufkin wrote:

"What is "clubbing"?

It used to be what Eskimo hunters did to baby seals until Bridget Bardot protested by threatening to do another one of her shitty softcore-porn-disguised-as-French-art movies, but I believe the politically-correct definition in the current vernacular is "out past your bedtime in an urban environment."

I guess if it is a rural enviroment it would be called road tripping or bar hoping.

 

3/20/2012 8:17 am  #41


Re: Rams

Angry Dolphin fan just got angrier.

Welcome the newest Dolphin!!! WE SIGNED A QUARTERBACK!!!

--David "Punkass Bitch" Garrard....

Seriously, our front office needs to just walk away from the telephone....

 

3/20/2012 9:53 am  #42


Re: Rams

alz wrote:

Angry Dolphin fan just got angrier.

Welcome the newest Dolphin!!! WE SIGNED A QUARTERBACK!!!

--David "Punkass Bitch" Garrard....

Seriously, our front office needs to just walk away from the telephone....

Denver is probably fielding offers for Tebow. 
(grin) (grin) (grin)

{I'm probably not helping, am I?}

 

3/20/2012 11:24 am  #43


Re: Rams

So the qb shuffle go something like  Manning to Denver.  Flynn to the Seahawks and Smith will likely go back to the 49ers.  Tebow is likely on the market.

 

3/20/2012 11:44 am  #44


Re: Rams

"Smith will likely go back to the 49ers."

If a guy stays with a team, he's not really part of a shuffle, now is he?
I'd like to read or hear what Elway's rationale is. Unless it's to accomplish a complete break from Tebow, signing Manning doesn't make a whole lot of long-term sense. This is Favre to the Jets, Part II. The Donkeys may win that crappy division next year, but the whole thing may backfire if Manning's spine explodes the first time he's hit in training camp.

 

3/20/2012 7:06 pm  #45


Re: Rams

It is a large contract for an injury risk, aging QB.  However if you give manning a few good players and an o-line he will win some games.

 

3/20/2012 9:40 pm  #46


Re: Rams

APRTW wrote:

It is a large contract for an injury risk, aging QB.  However if you give manning a few good players and an o-line he will win some games.

They have a couple of nice pieces on defense, but their starting receivers right now are a return specialist and a former first round draft pick who had been a disappointment until he caught that touchdown pass in overtime against Pittsburgh. They have no tight ends of substance. The O-line is decent, and McGahee is coming off a nice year, but he turned 30 (check, please), so how much longer can he keep going on that reconstructed knee? Maybe they'll get something out of Moreno, but he's regressed since his rookie year.
Remember they were minus-90 last year. That was worse than the Browns. Absent salary cap considerations, I could have seen the Redskins making a play for Manning. The Jets would have made sense. Teams that are otherwise pretty good but awful at quarterback. But Denver seems like a move that mostly satisfies Elway's humungous ego, so he doesn't have to admit at cocktail parties that Tim Tebow is his starting quarterback.
Kansas City has the best defense in the division and made some upgrades to its offense. Eric Winston is a great sign for them. And they get the best running back in the division back from injury. Rivers can't possibly play as badly in San Diego as he did last year. And neither the Chiefs nor the Chargers has to play a first place schedule in 2012.

 

3/21/2012 8:03 am  #47


Re: Rams

There's amendments to Manning's contract that change the deal if he can't pass a physical in 1 year, or has any other surgery to his neck.

The next person to mention Tebow as an option to me is going to get pistol whipped. If I wanted a quarterback that could only complete 45% of his throws, I'd have lobbied for them to keep Henne around...

I don't think this hurts Denver too much, but I look at Tebow as a gimmick player. He's a strong finisher in a football game. He really loves Jesus, which is a minor plus, because all of the drama that comes with a Brandon Marshall will never happen to Tebow. That's where his upside ends. The downside, he's a lefty built more like a linebacker than a QB, and his accuracy is off the charts (on the wrong side). This guy couldn't hit the garage door from the driveway. I'm interested to see how much Tebow can be coached up as a quarterback, but right now it doesn't look promising.

I don't know if Manning beats New England, but I'd have said Manning probably never beats Pittsburgh, and Tebow did that. His results are good, but his game looks so shitty until it's crunch time, I'd have a difficult time putting up with that. Matt Moore is better imo...

 

3/23/2012 4:00 pm  #48


Re: Rams

alz wrote:

It's the second time in as many days where I've raged at the injustice of an article enough to read comments and seen someone posting details that aren't covered in an article. The first was the White Neighborhood Watch Captain fatally shooting a 17 year old black resident armed with Arizona Iced Tea and a bag of Skittles. Later in the comments you read that cops have been quoted as having him say, "I screamed for someone to come help me, and nobody did." He was not charged, nor arrested. Much to the ire of the Yahoo News Group apparently... I have to ask why he wasn't arrested, and I have to assume it's because the police did not have enough evidence to arrest him for a crime. Whether that's because the entire police force is nothing but white racists, or because there are details I wasn't privy to that are being omitted is the guess there, and I'm moving with the latter. I can build a situation where the guy shouldn't have allowed a close confrontation to occur at all, rather stayed in his car. However he made that mistake, and if there was assault, and he was getting smashed with a full can of Ice Tea (which is like a 40)... I can see the gun coming into play, the unfortunate shooting, and no arrest happening too. Which story is right? No idea, but I can't rush to judgement.

I'm now approaching the "rush to judgment" stage, this guy is a fucking asshole, and was told by the 911 dispatch not to pursue anyone. He disobeyed this, went after the kid (thus in my eyes eliminating any fucking possibility of self-defense, but it's not quite so clear in Florida law. There it's apparently totally cool to go look for a confrontation, shoot the other fucking guy, and claim self defense as a result of the confrontation).

I'll be taking my ex-wife to Florida if you need me...

I shouldn't but I take some small measure of relief in the fact that this asshole is Hispanic decent, and not white. I do not want any type of association with this guy, racial or otherwise...

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]