Offline
I mentioned this a couple months ago at the old board, but I have finally got around to my replay of the 1984 Cardinals on Strat-O-Matic. Here's a few observations about the team before The Team. And keep in mind that I replayed the '84 Cardinals because a) I knew nothing about them and b) I wanted a challenge.
*This is really hard. Poor Whitey must have drank a lot because this team does not score runs. Five times in 13 games have I been held to one run. And that's even when I'm pulling out all the stops. We routinely outhit our opponents, but can never break through.
*We are the opposite of the 2010 Cardinals: we mash lefties (6-1) and suck against righties (1-5).
*Lonnie Smith is an awful, awful fielder.
*The Cardinals induced a lot of balks in '84.
*The schedule makers were horrible to the Cardinals that year. It's April 20 and we just wrapped a three-game series at Wrigley (dropped two of three). Through 13 games we've only played three times at home.
*The pitching was rough. Andujar either gives up a lot of hits or a lot of walks. I'm constantly walking the tight rope with him. I'm on a four-man rotation. Kepshire starts sparingly. I don't like Dave LaPoint.
*Tommy Herr, David Green and Ozzie are lights out at the plate. Porter and Hendrick are providing decent power.
*I'm shuffling the lineup to see if I can get some more offense generated. I was going with:
1. L. Smith
2. McGee
3. Herr
4. Green
5. Hendrick
6. Van Slyke/Obekerfell
7. Porter
8. Smith
But, McGee and Lonnie are off to terrible starts, so I'm moving them to seven and eight and leading off with Smith and Van Slyke.
*So far we're 7-6 (same as the real team) and 1.5 game out of first.
Offline
How do you do this? I am interested.
Offline
It costs around $70 because you have to purchase the version 15 CD-ROM ($50) then another $20 to access the codes for past seasons. But you just go to Strat-O-Matic's website to order. It's pretty simple to play.
Offline
Hang in there, TK. Next year you get Tudor, Coleman and Clark. You might even win the division. Just make sure Coleman stays in the dugout whenever it rains.
Speaking of which, today is the 25th anniversary of Game 7 of the '85 World Series, which concluded the most mind-numbing 27 hours of baseball I've ever witnessed.
Offline
" Just make sure Coleman stays in the dugout whenever it rain"
(grin) What is the name you had for this particular grin ? LOL
Offline
I'm not sure yet if I'll order the '85 season. I might just skip '85 and '87 and play '86 then '88 and beyond.
The lineup changes have worked beautifully. We've scored 14 runs in the last two games against the Expos and McGee has shown some life. I got a gritty performance from Kurt Kepshire, who pitched into the sixth inning, but was Suppan-esque.
I called in Sutter for a two-inning save, mostly because my bullpen was taxed. With two outs, freaking Tim Raines hit an inside-the-park-home-run and tied the game. Luckily, Van Slyke saved my ass with a walk-off in the bottom of the ninth.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
I'm not sure yet if I'll order the '85 season. I might just skip '85 and '87 and play '86 then '88 and beyond.
The lineup changes have worked beautifully. We've scored 14 runs in the last two games against the Expos and McGee has shown some life. I got a gritty performance from Kurt Kepshire, who pitched into the sixth inning, but was Suppan-esque.
I called in Sutter for a two-inning save, mostly because my bullpen was taxed. With two outs, freaking Tim Raines hit an inside-the-park-home-run and tied the game. Luckily, Van Slyke saved my ass with a walk-off in the bottom of the ninth.
Actually, in those days the closer was often called upon to go two innings. I can remember once when Jack Buck was interviewing Sutter pre-game after he had had a pretty rough outing, but a successful one, the night before. I can still recall him saying, "Hell, Jack, I'm just a two inning pitcher." At the time it seemed like a realistic, but self-effacing, concession.
I think he had come in with one or two outs in the 7th the night before.
Last edited by Mags (10/28/2010 10:52 am)
Offline
Right. I try to be as authentic as possible, so I bring in Sutter for six outs if I can.
I can't wait to bring up Pendleton because Oberkfell and Van Slyke are killing me at third base.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
Right. I try to be as authentic as possible, so I bring in Sutter for six outs if I can.
I can't wait to bring up Pendleton because Oberkfell and Van Slyke are killing me at third base.
I'm too slow these days to really understand how this all works but I was fascinated to read that you're getting production from David Green. Some of us here will remember that he was heralded as the next Roberto Clemente when the Cards acquired him in the trade with Milwaukee. He played CF for the AAA team the year before they acquired McGee and everyone talked about how he could really go get the ball. It made sense, however, when they moved him to Right when he came back from an injury and McGee was giving them all the could ask for in center.
It then came as a big surprise, to me at least, when they started playing him first and moved Hendrick back to RF. At the time, they blamed Green's struggles on his preoccupation with his family's situation in Nicaragua. Later we learned that he had an alcohol problem and was probably a lot older than his "official" age.
Even though he was horribly inconsistent during his time in St. Louis, they more than got their money's worth out of Andujar. As I recall, at the time they traded Tony Scott for him he was working out of the pen for Houston and they had pretty much given up on him. I really liked Scott but it was clear that he wasn't going to be able to contribute on a winning team.
Van Slyke came up as an OF-!B and was hitting about .360 in AAA when they first called him up but he struggled. He was obviously an exceptional outfielder but not as good as he later became. Still, I don't think Whitey handled him well.
Who is your other catcher? I think we were past Glenn Brummer by then. It seems like it would have been either Nieto or Lavaliere.
Last edited by Mags (10/28/2010 10:31 pm)
Offline
Nieto and Dane Iorg.
Offline
I haven't seen the computerized version you're playing. Back in the mid-late 80's I started playing Strat-o-Matic when it was cards and dice. Myself and a bunch of friends would draft our own teams, one in the NL and one in the AL, divide each league into 2 divisions, and play full 162 game seasons.
Your discussion about Sutter got me wondering whether the current version accounts for things such as fatigue. Obviously the cards did not. We made up a few of our own rules and improvised. For example, a pitcher would have a faitgue rating and once you reached the designated inning, certain spots on his card that had been an out became a hit. We added a rule that if your relief pitcher had pitched his inning limit the night before, then his inning limit was reduced an inning the next night (and so on if you pitched him 3 straight nights). We did the same thing with starters if they pitched on 3 days rest rather than 4.
I remember the big "improvement" around that time was when they rated the parks for hitting and power. The Kingdome was a power hitter's paradise and the Astrodome was a pitcher's haven. Everyone wanted guys who posted big numbers in the large parks, especially if your were in a City where it was easy to hit homers. In 88, we were using the 87 cards. I ended up with Atlanta as my NL city (old Fulton County Stadium) and drafted Clark to play 1B. He had hit something like 35 HR in 87 despite missing a month or more due to injury. I got lucky and Clark stayed healthy and he hit something like 54 or 55 HR for me and drove in close to 150. That was the one year I actually won.
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
Nieto and Dane Iorg.
That's interesting. I don't recall Iorg ever being used as a catcher. I do recall one game when Whitey had overmanaged and Iorg wound up playing 3B and he actually had to pick up a routine grounder and throw to first. He looked terribly awkward and almost threw the ball over the first baseman's head. It was the third out and he had an embarrassed grin as he left the field. It was obvious that a couple of his teammates were needling him.
Offline
There's a good chance I used him wrong. He's been deactivated and only had two at-bats.
The bench is:
Landrum
Oberkfell
Howe
Van Slyke
Braun
Nieto
Brummer
Offline
tkihshbt wrote:
There's a good chance I used him wrong. He's been deactivated and only had two at-bats.
The bench is:
Landrum
Oberkfell
Howe
Van Slyke
Braun
Nieto
Brummer
He was pretty weak on defense even in the OF, especially in comparison to the other guys they had during the 82-84 time frame. But one year, 82 or 83 I think, he got to start most of the games they played in Montreal. Apparently Hendrick claimed he wasn't comfortable in that ballpark but Whitey said the real reason was Rogers, Sanderson, and Guillickson.
Offline
"Even though he was horribly inconsistent during his time in St. Louis, they more than got their money's worth out of Andujar. As I recall, at the time they traded Tony Scott for him he was working out of the pen for Houston and they had pretty much given up on him. I really liked Scott but it was clear that he wasn't going to be able to contribute on a winning team."
I don't know if Andujar would have flourished under too many other managers in that era. Maybe Harvey Keunn, or Bob Lemon. He certainly never would have been able to do what he did under Billy Martin or Sparky or Dick Williams. I can't even imagine Andujar in this era being managed by La Russa.
If I recall, Scott was one of the drug guys. That's the irony of Whitey. You could be pretty much a certifiable nut like Andujar and Whitey would know exactly how much slack he could let out, but he didn't have any tolerance for the drug guys. I'm not saying that in an entirely complimentary way, BTW.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
"Even though he was horribly inconsistent during his time in St. Louis, they more than got their money's worth out of Andujar. As I recall, at the time they traded Tony Scott for him he was working out of the pen for Houston and they had pretty much given up on him. I really liked Scott but it was clear that he wasn't going to be able to contribute on a winning team."
I don't know if Andujar would have flourished under too many other managers in that era. Maybe Harvey Keunn, or Bob Lemon. He certainly never would have been able to do what he did under Billy Martin or Sparky or Dick Williams. I can't even imagine Andujar in this era being managed by La Russa.
If I recall, Scott was one of the drug guys. That's the irony of Whitey. You could be pretty much a certifiable nut like Andujar and Whitey would know exactly how much slack he could let out, but he didn't have any tolerance for the drug guys. I'm not saying that in an entirely complimentary way, BTW.
It's been a long time, but I would have swore that Andujar was a cocaine-user. Didn't he participate in that big cocaine trial that happened around the mid-late 80's? Sorry, I'm too lazy to look it up.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
"Even though he was horribly inconsistent during his time in St. Louis, they more than got their money's worth out of Andujar. As I recall, at the time they traded Tony Scott for him he was working out of the pen for Houston and they had pretty much given up on him. I really liked Scott but it was clear that he wasn't going to be able to contribute on a winning team."
I don't know if Andujar would have flourished under too many other managers in that era. Maybe Harvey Keunn, or Bob Lemon. He certainly never would have been able to do what he did under Billy Martin or Sparky or Dick Williams. I can't even imagine Andujar in this era being managed by La Russa.
If I recall, Scott was one of the drug guys. That's the irony of Whitey. You could be pretty much a certifiable nut like Andujar and Whitey would know exactly how much slack he could let out, but he didn't have any tolerance for the drug guys. I'm not saying that in an entirely complimentary way, BTW.It's been a long time, but I would have swore that Andujar was a cocaine-user. Didn't he participate in that big cocaine trial that happened around the mid-late 80's? Sorry, I'm too lazy to look it up.
You're correct. Channeling Miss Emily Latella: "Never mind."
Last edited by artie_fufkin (10/29/2010 11:17 am)
Offline
We're back in a funk. Took four straight, but now we've lost three straight and got trounced in a series by Montreal, who in Replay World is 5-15.
I can't say enough about how frustrating this offense is, but now the pitching is starting to unravel a bit. Forsch got slapped around by Pittsburgh and I can't deal with LaPoint anymore.
Offline
Forsch has been kicked out of the rotation. Stuper's in and he's doing a super job.
This bullpen is absolute nails. If I wouldn't have to stop climbing out of holes, we would never lose. Jeff Lahti is eating righties up -- they are 2-for-31 against him. Allen is holding them to around a .100 average.
Horton is also brilliant. Lefties are 0-for-11 against him.
Sutter, though. Wow. He has one blown save (a game we still won) and he's unhittable. Neither lefties or righties can solve him right now. And he's not being used La Russa-style. If we're up, he's pitching the eighth and ninth. I've even brought him during the seventh. I love Sutter.
If I have a lead by the fifth inning, I consider the game over. Lahti, Allen, Horton and Sutter are that good.
In my most recent game with Andujar, he took a no-hitter into the seventh against Atlanta. Held on for a two-hit shutout.
That's the good news. Bad news: the offense still sucks. I've tried pushing every button I can and this team will not hit. I'm down to four productive hitters: Hendrick, Landrum, Herr and Porter. Ozzie mashes lefties, but sucks bad against righties. Lonnie and Willie are nearing lost cause territory. Green has fallen way, way off. Van Slyke seems like a good option, but he's killing me defensively and he's not hitting at all.
We lead the league in stolen bases and attempts, but our success rate is near the bottom -- just 64 percent. I feel like I have to constantly push it on the bases because otherwise we have zero chance of scoring. We're also terrible at the hit-and-run.
I think everyone knows my philosophy towards managing has a libertarian streak. Well, sometimes you need to be more Lyndon Johnson than Barry Goldwater. Example: we're trailing 3-1 late in a game against Cincinnati. Brummer singles with two outs to bring up the pitchers spot. I've got Braun, McGee, Nieto, Porter, Van Slyke and Oberkfell. Problem is that only two can bat right-handed. McGee can't hit lefties at all, so I roll the dice with Nieto. He walks! Two on, two outs and Ozzie's coming up against a lefty. He owns them and he delivers a base hit. Brummer scores and it's 3-2. David Green up and he singles. Now I have the option to send Nieto, but the computer tells me he's likely to be thrown out at the plate. So I hold him up since I've got my best hitter, Herr, coming up.
Herr pops out and we never rally again.
I was kicking myself afterwards because I should have pinch-ran McGee for Nieto and it cost me.
Offline
Thanks, TK. This really brings back a lot of memories.
Van Slyke was awful at 3B and I really can't understand why.
For about 2 or 3 years, Jeff Lahti was about the best set-up man I've ever seen. He was a true rally-killer, usually in the 6th or 7th inning. Even though Lahti didn't throw nearly as hard, Motte -- at least when he was really on -- reminded me a lot of Lahti this past season. Lahti would come high and tight on right handed hitters and then come back and nail them with a hard-slider on the low and away corner. Unlike Motte, he was consistent with his control.
Ironically, I believe it was in '84 that I recall Jack Buck saying that Stuper had just completely destroyed their bullpen during one stretch.