You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



6/25/2012 6:50 pm  #1


Duh...

"Outfielder Marlon Byrd, who admitted to working with the man whose center triggered a federal investigation of steroids use and distribution among athletes, has tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs....While with the Cubs in spring training, Byrd admitted that he was the only player in baseball who still worked with Victor Conte. Conte's Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative was at the center of the steroid scandal surrounding Barry Bonds, among others."

Whose reputation takes the bigger hit here--Byrd for testing positive for PEDs--or Conte, who PEDs were apparently only good enough to produce a .210 average and 1 home run?

http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/stats/_/id/5033/marlon-byrd

 

6/25/2012 10:39 pm  #2


Re: Duh...

"Whose reputation takes the bigger hit here"

The Red Sox. They swapped a sack of batting practice balls and a used L screen to the Cubs for this guy and still came out on the short end.

 

6/25/2012 10:52 pm  #3


Re: Duh...

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Whose reputation takes the bigger hit here"

The Red Sox. They swapped a sack of batting practice balls and a used L screen to the Cubs for this guy and still came out on the short end.

Theo's brilliant

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]