1 of 1- Max
- Colby Rasmus
Offline 
- From: Pacific Northwest
- Registered: 9/07/2010
- Posts: 5,269
Ouch
this piece actually hurts to read in places: trade chip?!? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that trade chit? Supposably that's what he meant, anyway, . . . irregardless. Not that I want to throw insults around, but is it true this column is going to change its name to "Baseball for Dummies"?
Anyway, there's not much new in here, other than a few different scenarios that could bring Uggla here. No mention of what we would trade to get him, however.
- forsberg_us
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 9/08/2010
- Posts: 9,944
Re: Ouch
Uggla is intriguing, but if they're already conceding that they can't resign him after 2011, I'm not sure that's a very good move. I'd prefer they take a chance on a free agent that didn't cost them players.
- forsberg_us
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 9/08/2010
- Posts: 9,944
Re: Ouch
Never mind Uggla. He just got dealt to the Braves.
- Mags
- Ray Lankford
Offline
- From: Tora Bora West
- Registered: 9/08/2010
- Posts: 1,441
Re: Ouch
I'd love to have a copy of that picture Rasmus with his signature. Man that guy can really get up there. But where did that extra baseball come from?
- Max
- Colby Rasmus
Offline
- From: Pacific Northwest
- Registered: 9/07/2010
- Posts: 5,269
Re: Ouch
Mags wrote:
I'd love to have a copy of that picture Rasmus with his signature. Man that guy can really get up there. But where did that extra baseball come from?
Yes, that picture brought a smile to my eye, too. I wonder if Gordon forgot to put his glasses on before OK-ing that one. No wait, he was the guy talking about trading Rasmus, so I guess it makes sense.
- •
Thread Starter