Offline
Nobody
Offline
Biggio 68.2%
Morris 67.7%
Bagwell 59.6%
Piazza 57.8%
Raines 52.2%
Clemens 37.6%
Bonds 36.2%
Sosa 12.5%
Offline
I'd like to hear the rationale from the guys who didn't vote for the Steroid Boys because they took drugs or suspected they took drugs but voted for Tim Raines, a coke head who got 52 percent.
Last edited by artie_fufkin (1/09/2013 2:44 pm)
Offline
Id let them all in. You got the numbers you get the vote. Anything less is like saying something that happend did not.
Offline
I don't understand the Biggio vote. He's never been tainted by steroids, unless by association with Bagwell, and he's got 3,000 hits. If they're making him wait a year because of that mentality that only truly great players get in on the first ballot, that's just silly.
Offline
I dont understand the idea that a player is a HOFer but not a first ballot HOFer either. One of the talking heads (IDK which one) was saying that Biggo hanging around just to get 3,000 hits had something to do with it.
Another thing I dont understand is why guys like Sosa and McGwire dont have as many votes as Clemens and Bonds. A roider is a roider and they all have the numbers to get in. Why a writer would vote for one but not the other doesnt make sense.
Offline
This guy is on the right track:
Narrow the number of voters and throw out the stupid clause about morality. I've always said the Pro Football Hall of Fame at least has a consistent system. They have a murderer and a coke head who sleeps with underage hookers in there, but they got in because of what they did on the field.
Offline
I like Goold's take on it
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
I'd like to hear the rationale from the guys who didn't vote for the Steroid Boys because they took drugs or suspected they took drugs but voted for Tim Raines, a coke head who got 52 percent.
My hunch is that it was because the coke did not help him get the HOF numbers. It probably hurt, if anything.
It would be like a college entrance board reviewing exam results. Two kids who sat for the test were borderline and also had disciplinary infractions. One was drunk when he took the test, the other snuck a calculator in. I'd vote for the drunk one before the cheater.
Last edited by Max (1/09/2013 6:50 pm)
Offline
APIAD wrote:
Another thing I dont understand is why guys like Sosa and McGwire dont have as many votes as Clemens and Bonds. A roider is a roider and they all have the numbers to get in. Why a writer would vote for one but not the other doesnt make sense.
Because they had HOF numbers before 'roiding . . . supposedly.
So, in both cases, this and the one above, the issue is: are PED's likely to be a major factor in the HOF numbers. I can follow that logic, and I have no problem keeping cheaters out if the cheating was what got them the HOF numbers. I might go the next step and keep all roiders out, too. But I'm saying I understand the logic here, at least.
It would be like if Greg Maddux let slip in an interview that he had been illegally throwing a spitball since AAA, and that he relied on it year after year to make him an ace.
Last edited by Max (1/09/2013 6:55 pm)
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
I like Goold's take on it
Yeah, but gambling has always been baseball's third rail. There are still posters in every major league clubhouse reminding the players the first commandment of baseball is "Thou Shall Not Bet on Baseball." Rose's unbridled hubris is what's kept him out as much as the actual offense.
Another part of Goold's argument is valid. There's no reason why there are so many ballots out there. Bob Ryan should have had his yanked when he picked the 2004 Cardinals to finish in fifth place in their division. Baseball Hall of Fame ballots are almost as ubiquitous as Heisman Trophy ballots, and the Heisman Trophy is a joke.
Offline
Cheating is baseball.
Offline
Max wrote:
It would be like if Greg Maddux let slip in an interview that he had been illegally throwing a spitball since AAA, and that he relied on it year after year to make him an ace.
Wouldn't that make him Gaylord Perry?
Offline
I'm actually thrilled by this. I've said from day one McGwire is only being snubbed because of PED's. Palmiero would otherwise be in as well. I don't mind if the Hall of Fame voters take a stand, but I was prepared to be incensed if they let Bonds and Clemens in.
They seem to be applying a standard, I'm okay with it.
Offline
It's a difficult standard to define and manage. Baseball hasn't done, nor can it expect to do, anything to erase the results of the Steroid Era. Bonds still holds the record for career and single season home runs. McGwire still is recognized as the first to hit 70, and Sosa is the only person to hit 60 or more HRs three times. Bonds still has his 7 MVPs and Clemens still has his 7 Cy Youngs. The Giants still have their 2012 World Series despite the fact that Melky Cabrera (who got caught) played more than 3/4ths of their games. So if the results stand, then how can the Hall of Fame not recognize them?
I've never been to the Hall, so I can't speak to its floor plan or how it's set up. But it seems to me that the purpose of the HoF is to tell the story of the game and those who played it. Rather than act like the steroid era never happened, acknowledge that it did and tell the story. Let people make their own determination as to what, if anything it means to them.
And I say this in all seriousness, there are plenty of items that could be sent to the Hall for display. Send an original copy of the Mitchell Report. Send images from the players testifying in front of Congress. Send the syringes that McNamee supposedly shoved in Clemens' arse. There's an entire era of baseball where power numbers were inflated on a scale that hasn't been seen in the past, and may never be seen again. Just tell the story and move on.
Offline
"I've never been to the Hall, so I can't speak to its floor plan or how it's set up. But it seems to me that the purpose of the HoF is to tell the story of the game and those who played it. Rather than act like the steroid era never happened, acknowledge that it did and tell the story. Let people make their own determination as to what, if anything it means to them.
"And I say this in all seriousness, there are plenty of items that could be sent to the Hall for display. Send an original copy of the Mitchell Report. Send images from the players testifying in front of Congress. Send the syringes that McNamee supposedly shoved in Clemens' arse."
That'd be great. You could put cut-outs of Barry Bonds' when he played with the Pirates and when he played with the Giants and turn it into a compare-and-contrast type of thing. Something fun for the kids. "Look, dad, I can easily fit my head through the hole with the swollen, hot air balloon-sized version of Barry's dome!!!"
I have been to the HofF and I can tell you there's very much a hear-no-evil; see-no-evil vibe to the place. You're not going to find any mention of Ty Cobb beating the crap out of the black groundskeeper who wanted to shake his hand, Babe Ruth's sexual proclivities, Landis' racist policies, or a "Better Baseball Through Narcotics" exhibit.
BTW, I think you're right. Show all of baseball's history, even the warts.
Offline
Fat Ass is still in denial, still using the Royal We:
"After what has been said and written over the last few years I'm not overly surprised.
"Thanks to all the teams I've worked with and to fans and friends for all the fantastic letters, voice mails, and texts of support over the last few years.
"To those who did take the time to look at the facts...we very much appreciate it."
Shaughnessy had the best response to the "They-were-Hall-of-Famers-before-steroids" mentality: If you only cheat on the back nine, it's still cheating.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Max wrote:
It would be like if Greg Maddux let slip in an interview that he had been illegally throwing a spitball since AAA, and that he relied on it year after year to make him an ace.
Wouldn't that make him Gaylord Perry?
Exactly! People cheat in the game of baseball. Always have, always will. If they can get the numbers without getting kicked out of the league they should get in.
I am okay with them banning Rose or Jackson as part of there punishment for something they did during their career. I would be okay if as part of the punishment for roiding was to be banned from the HOF. However you cant apply rules to the past.
Offline
Major League Baseball will test for human growth hormone throughout the regular season and will step up efforts to track the use of artificial testosterone.
Players were subject to blood testing for HGH during spring training last year, and Thursday's agreement between management and the players' association expands that throughout the season. Those are in addition to urine tests for other performance-enhancing drugs.
Under the changes to baseball's drug agreement, the World Anti-Doping Agency laboratory in Laval, Quebec, will keep records of each player, including his baseline ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone, and will conduct Carbon Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) tests of any urine specimens that "vary materially."
Also Thursday, owners approved the transfer of control of the Cleveland Indians to Paul Dolan, son of owner Larry Dolan.
Offline
"the World Anti-Doping Agency laboratory in Laval, Quebec, will keep records of each player, including his baseline ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone, and will conduct Carbon Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) tests of any urine specimens that "vary materially."
I think I'd rather work at the Piggly Wiggly than analyze piss.