You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/03/2013 4:00 pm  #326


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

APIAD wrote:

it is looking like furcal is out for the year.  his elbow is getting worst and not better.  what should the cardinals do?  cedano isnt hitting yet and kozma is always going to be kozma.

Geez, go figure Furcal's torn ligament didn't heal.
 

 

3/03/2013 6:54 pm  #327


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

So what's the current damage:

Carp $12.5 million
Furcal $6.5 million

$19 million, or a little more than 17% of an expected $110 million opening day payroll.  
 

 

3/04/2013 6:15 am  #328


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

This might be a chance to play Ryan Jackson, who was supposedly ready to play defense on a MLB diamond on Day One. Guessing that's not going to happen though.

 

3/04/2013 9:03 am  #329


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

tkihshbt wrote:

This might be a chance to play Ryan Jackson, who was supposedly ready to play defense on a MLB diamond on Day One. Guessing that's not going to happen though.

For whatever reason, MM seems to think Kozma is a better option than Jackson. I haven't seen enough of Jackson to know whether he's a major league shortstop, but it's not like he's got to beat out Honus Wagner.
 

 

3/04/2013 10:41 am  #330


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

artie_fufkin wrote:

tkihshbt wrote:

This might be a chance to play Ryan Jackson, who was supposedly ready to play defense on a MLB diamond on Day One. Guessing that's not going to happen though.

For whatever reason, MM seems to think Kozma is a better option than Jackson. I haven't seen enough of Jackson to know whether he's a major league shortstop, but it's not like he's got to beat out Honus Wagner.
 

I thought we concluded last season that Jackson must've banged Mrs. Matheny.  I don't even remember Larussa burying a guy as quickly as Jackson got buried on last year's roster.

     Thread Starter
 

3/04/2013 10:43 am  #331


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

Bernie was talking about it the other day. He asked the audience to guess how many innings Jackson actually played at shortstop. I said aloud "less than five."

It was 2 1/3. 

 

3/04/2013 11:39 am  #332


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"I don't even remember Larussa burying a guy as quickly as Jackson got buried on last year's roster."

Didn't TLR banish Mike Maroth to a Siberian prison camp after about a week?
Then there was the Juan Gonzalez fiasco. His tenure with the Birds on the Bat lasted either one inning or one at bat, I can't remember which. But it was Spring Training, so I guess that doesn't count.

 

3/04/2013 12:39 pm  #333


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"Didn't TLR banish Mike Maroth to a Siberian prison camp after about a week?"
According to Baseball Reference, Maroth made a month's worth of starts (6) before being banished to the bullpen.  And in fairness to Larussa, in the 3 starts before being sent to the pen, Maroth gave up 23 ER in 14 IP, so at least Maroth did something to earn his way into the doghouse.

     Thread Starter
 

3/04/2013 7:29 pm  #334


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

forsberg_us wrote:

"Didn't TLR banish Mike Maroth to a Siberian prison camp after about a week?"
According to Baseball Reference, Maroth made a month's worth of starts (6) before being banished to the bullpen.  And in fairness to Larussa, in the 3 starts before being sent to the pen, Maroth gave up 23 ER in 14 IP, so at least Maroth did something to earn his way into the doghouse.

Oh, I'm not saying Maroth didn't deserve the Gulag. He probably didn't warrant being signed in the first place. He was a giant orb of suckishness long before the Cardinals got ahold of him. Shows you how desperate they were that season.
 

Last edited by artie_fufkin (3/04/2013 7:30 pm)

 

3/04/2013 7:33 pm  #335


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

The Jackson issue wouldnt be suprising if the Cardinals middle infield wasnt so weak.  For Jackson not to be in the hunt it is pretty telling.

 

3/04/2013 7:46 pm  #336


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"Oh, I'm not saying Maroth didn't deserve the Gulag. He probably didn't warrant being signed in the first place."

Didn't the Cardinals trade a former 1st round pick for Maroth?  Not a good one, but for some reason I thought they traded one of those "vaunted" prospects to acquire Maroth. 
 

     Thread Starter
 

3/05/2013 7:26 am  #337


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

 

3/05/2013 9:19 am  #338


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"Mozeliak not happy the Cardinals are being criticized for the Furcal situation."

If this was a singular incident? Yeah ... maybe. But Moz is being entirely disingenuous by ignoring the historical evidence that the Cardinals have downplayed practically every single injury since Dizzy Dean got beaned in the 1934 World Series.

 

3/05/2013 9:28 am  #339


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"Didn't the Cardinals trade a former 1st round pick for Maroth?  Not a good one, but for some reason I thought they traded one of those "vaunted" prospects to acquire Maroth."

Yeah, Chris Lambert, the kid from Boston College who was one of those "high signability" picks. I think the last guy who played baseball at Boston College and had even a modestly-successful career in pros was Mike Mayock. And that was in a different sport.

 

3/05/2013 9:34 am  #340


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

Didnt lambert get some time in the majors.  I have been suprised that pj walters has got alittle play.  whasnt chris narvaston or what ever in the cards system as well.  

 

3/05/2013 9:43 am  #341


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

APIAD wrote:

Didnt lambert get some time in the majors.  I have been suprised that pj walters has got alittle play.  whasnt chris narvaston or what ever in the cards system as well.  

I think Lambert spent a couple of months with the Tigers, but they released him, and the team that picked him up on waivers after that (Blue Jays?) also let him go.
Narveson was part of the Larry Walker trade, then I think the Rockies released him and he came back to the Cardinals before they let him go and he ended up in Milwaukee.

 

3/05/2013 10:35 am  #342


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

he has pitch quit a bit for the brewers tho.  i mean for as shitty pitchef as he is

 

3/05/2013 10:46 am  #343


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

narveson even has a winning record.  who would have guessed.  didnt that todd pitcher make it for awhile with an al team.

 

3/05/2013 11:00 am  #344


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

Jess Todd pitched a couple dozen games with the Indians, posted an ERA over 7 and was released.  He was briefly back in the Cardinals organization but has since been released.

Mozeliak's response to the Furcal situation is BS.  No one that I've read is suggesting they should have forced Furcal to have surgery.  For one, you can't force a player to have surgery and two, if Furcal had undergone the surgery he likely would have been lost for the year anyway.  The criticism is that the team didn't do anything to protect itself in the event this happened.  Yunel Escobar changed teams twice this off-season.  Mike Aviles was traded.  Stephen Drew signed for 1 year.  Any of those options would have been significantly better than Ronny Cedeno or Pete Kozma.

     Thread Starter
 

3/05/2013 11:18 am  #345


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

i agree 100%.  this is normal for the cardinals.  if they are still in this thing at the trade deadline they will address it like they always do.  i think you fix thing prior to the season, not midway.  idk if mo think a midseason fix makes him look smarter or what.

 

3/05/2013 11:52 am  #346


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

APIAD wrote:

he has pitch quit a bit for the brewers tho.  i mean for as shitty pitchef as he is

He was their fifth starter a couple of years ago and was pretty effective until he got hurt.
 

 

3/05/2013 12:00 pm  #347


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

"Mozeliak's response to the Furcal situation is BS."

Aye.
Maybe going with Kozma was the plan all along. I don't know. He's certainly a cheaper option, and he's got an advocate in the clubhouse. You would think with all those experienced baseball people in the front office they would have learned it's difficult to have a winning club when you skimp on defense at shortstop. It's the reason they went out and got Furcal in the first place.
If Jackson is the goods defensively, then I'd rather see them go with him and try to account for his offense elsewhere. It's not like Kozma is going to put up .300/30/100 anyway.

 

3/05/2013 12:13 pm  #348


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

that is why i dont understand wht jackson isnt at least getting looks.  how bad can he be.  he isnt even beimg considered.  tulowiski isnt going to happen but this club could use his middle of the order bat.  this club got luck with berkman in 2011 and beltran in 2012.  that shit wint keep happening.

 

3/08/2013 1:23 am  #349


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Mozeliak's response to the Furcal situation is BS."

Aye.
Maybe going with Kozma was the plan all along. I don't know. He's certainly a cheaper option, and he's got an advocate in the clubhouse. You would think with all those experienced baseball people in the front office they would have learned it's difficult to have a winning club when you skimp on defense at shortstop. It's the reason they went out and got Furcal in the first place.
If Jackson is the goods defensively, then I'd rather see them go with him and try to account for his offense elsewhere. It's not like Kozma is going to put up .300/30/100 anyway.

They had the best defensive SS in the league by a wide margin, and he was cheap and cost controlled, but they let him go because of personality issues.  So a first guess is that personality issues loom large again.  

 

3/08/2013 10:10 am  #350


Re: New 2013 Cards Hot Stove

Max wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

"Mozeliak's response to the Furcal situation is BS."

Aye.
Maybe going with Kozma was the plan all along. I don't know. He's certainly a cheaper option, and he's got an advocate in the clubhouse. You would think with all those experienced baseball people in the front office they would have learned it's difficult to have a winning club when you skimp on defense at shortstop. It's the reason they went out and got Furcal in the first place.
If Jackson is the goods defensively, then I'd rather see them go with him and try to account for his offense elsewhere. It's not like Kozma is going to put up .300/30/100 anyway.

They had the best defensive SS in the league by a wide margin, and he was cheap and cost controlled, but they let him go because of personality issues.  So a first guess is that personality issues loom large again.  

He also had an OPS of .573 the season before they traded him. And he somehow managed to get worse last year. It's OK to suck at the plate if you've got Brendan Ryan's glove. And it's OK to be surly. But you can't suck at the plate and be surly.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]