You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



2/14/2013 3:32 pm  #1


A little help from the writers please

Found on Rotoworld. Thursday, February 14.

"Wilson Ramos caught his first bullpen session since undergoing knee surgery on Thursday in Nats camp."

Ramos must be a very fast healer. And kudos to the Nats for having a surgery center in their Spring Training facility. 

 

2/14/2013 4:08 pm  #2


Re: A little help from the writers please

Yeah, that's not a very good sentence. 

 

2/14/2013 9:56 pm  #3


Re: A little help from the writers please

What, you've never heard of day surgery?

 

2/16/2013 12:33 pm  #4


Re: A little help from the writers please

I actually received this email:

On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:39 PM, SciencePG wrote:

Dear Max Tuindoh, 

Science Publihsing Group call for papers! 

 

2/16/2013 12:34 pm  #5


Re: A little help from the writers please

Here's another one I saw a month or so back:

"It doesn't feel like [I got robbed]," Ben told Access Hollywood at the Critics' Choice Awards on Thursday night. "We got nominated for Best Picture and seven other nominations. I guess I would of liked to personally have two or like three, four or five for myself, but I'll take whatever we got... it's a pretty cool thing." http://news.yahoo.com/ben-affleck-weighs-oscar-snub-151654805.html


​"would of"?!?  Professional journalists really write this crap?  And editors don't catch it???
 

 

2/16/2013 6:35 pm  #6


Re: A little help from the writers please

Max wrote:

Here's another one I saw a month or so back:

"It doesn't feel like [I got robbed]," Ben told Access Hollywood at the Critics' Choice Awards on Thursday night. "We got nominated for Best Picture and seven other nominations. I guess I would of liked to personally have two or like three, four or five for myself, but I'll take whatever we got... it's a pretty cool thing." http://news.yahoo.com/ben-affleck-weighs-oscar-snub-151654805.html


​"would of"?!?  Professional journalists really write this crap?  And editors don't catch it???
 

If you owned a copy of "Nightmares" by the J. Geils Band, you would have seen "Must Of Got Lost" on the song list. By the time they got to "Blow Your Face Out," the title had been changed to "Musta Got Lost," but there wasn't one person at Atlantic records who looked at the original version and said "Hey ...."

 

2/28/2013 5:57 pm  #7


Re: A little help from the writers please

artie_fufkin wrote:

Max wrote:

Here's another one I saw a month or so back:

"It doesn't feel like [I got robbed]," Ben told Access Hollywood at the Critics' Choice Awards on Thursday night. "We got nominated for Best Picture and seven other nominations. I guess I would of liked to personally have two or like three, four or five for myself, but I'll take whatever we got... it's a pretty cool thing." http://news.yahoo.com/ben-affleck-weighs-oscar-snub-151654805.html


​"would of"?!?  Professional journalists really write this crap?  And editors don't catch it???
 

If you owned a copy of "Nightmares" by the J. Geils Band, you would have seen "Must Of Got Lost" on the song list. By the time they got to "Blow Your Face Out," the title had been changed to "Musta Got Lost," but there wasn't one person at Atlantic records who looked at the original version and said "Hey ...."

Funny, in a Spinal Tappy way.  But I can easily see the record company remaining silent; given the way musicians flaunt their stupidity like a gold-capped incisor, the money-folk at Atlantic probably saw it as self-branding.

 

3/13/2013 3:47 pm  #8


Re: A little help from the writers please

"The Vatican band and Swiss Guard marched into St. Peter's Square ahead of the new leader who they have been sworn to protect for centuries."

http://gma.yahoo.com/white-smoke-over-sistine-chapel-means-new-pope-elected-180953008.html

 

3/14/2013 7:56 am  #9


Re: A little help from the writers please

Max wrote:

"The Vatican band and Swiss Guard marched into St. Peter's Square ahead of the new leader who they have been sworn to protect for centuries."

http://gma.yahoo.com/white-smoke-over-sistine-chapel-means-new-pope-elected-180953008.html

 

On the plus side, he'll be easier to protect after he dies.

 

3/14/2013 11:02 am  #10


Re: A little help from the writers please

artie_fufkin wrote:

Max wrote:

"The Vatican band and Swiss Guard marched into St. Peter's Square ahead of the new leader who they have been sworn to protect for centuries."

http://gma.yahoo.com/white-smoke-over-sistine-chapel-means-new-pope-elected-180953008.html

 

On the plus side, he'll be easier to protect after he dies.

Indeed. Remember the olden days when using "who" instead of "whom" was as bad as it got?

 

3/14/2013 12:17 pm  #11


Re: A little help from the writers please

JV wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

Max wrote:

"The Vatican band and Swiss Guard marched into St. Peter's Square ahead of the new leader who they have been sworn to protect for centuries."

http://gma.yahoo.com/white-smoke-over-sistine-chapel-means-new-pope-elected-180953008.html

 

On the plus side, he'll be easier to protect after he dies.

Indeed. Remember the olden days when using "who" instead of "whom" was as bad as it got?

 

That's pretty easy. "Whom" usually precedes a preposition. "Affect" and "effect" still trips me up. And in an overall sense, spellcheck has made me too lazy for my own good.
But the one that's driving me crazy lately is "heighth," as in "Overall, the Blue Devils have good heighth, especially at the center position." You can have length, and you can have width, but you can't have "heighth."

 

3/14/2013 12:33 pm  #12


Re: A little help from the writers please

"​new leader who they have been sworn to protect for centuries"

There's so much wrong with this that we could dig into many parts ('have been sworn' . . . ?  Uh, I am guessing that should have been 'have sworn'.).  My bigger gripe was the construction of the sentence, which as it reads, means that the Swiss gaurds have sworn (or have been sworn, perhaps) to protect this new leader for centuries.  I am envisioning an ancient Knight Templar standing over the dusty bones of this guy.  


Perhaps Artie's comment reflects that he read it that way, too.
 

Last edited by Max (3/14/2013 12:35 pm)

 

4/18/2013 2:25 am  #13


Re: A little help from the writers please

 

4/18/2013 9:13 am  #14


Re: A little help from the writers please

*Sniff* I've tried to point this out for years, maybe even decades. If one is a suspect, the possibility that he/she committed the offense is implied.

 

4/19/2013 1:38 am  #15


Re: A little help from the writers please

"In Washington earlier today, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano testified before a congressional committee that some of the video collected from the bomb scenes near the marathon finish line had raised questions. She said there were “individuals” the FBI would like to speak to. “I wouldn’t characterize them as ‘suspects’ under the technical term."

"At today’s news conference, DesLauriers of the FBI said that “within the last day or so” the FBI had initially “developed a single person of interest”"



And because "suspect" sounds too incrimanatory, they create a new category "person of interest".  That's like calling a mentally challenged kid an "exceptional child".  If it were up to me, we would reserve "person of interest" for Halle Berry and the like, and stick with "suspect" when referring to a person who might have committed a crime.  



 

Last edited by Max (4/19/2013 1:39 am)

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]