Offline
Passan should stick to carving up Jeffrey Loria, because it's the only thing he's really good at. Something does have to be done about crashing the catcher, and La Russa's idea is a pretty good one, but putting middle infielders at more risk because catchers are already at risk falls under a "vacuum of illogic," to quote the author.
Offline
Maybe I'm gaining an appreciation for Passan since he makes a weekly appearance on McKernan's radio show, but I don't see a problem with anything he said. I didn't read it as Passan advocating a position one way or the other. All I read was him asking the question of whether the umpires, using replay, will allow infielders to continue to make these sort of plays and, if not, is a rule change needed to protect the infielders.
In light of the play last night, both are fair questions.
Offline
My two cents. You have to touch second while in possession of the ball. That's a pretty biblical rule of executing a force out. I can't see you sacrificing that because of a hard slide, that's also part of the game, and in my opinion just a risk of the trade. Like a collision at home plate, or an aggravated hitter charging the mound, or a batter getting a rib cracked due to a fastball.
Part of the game.
Offline
If middle infielders aren't given a little leeway around the bag, we're going to be taking second basemen to the hospital every other game. Baseball isn't intended to be a contact sport. There's no way players can last for six months if they start playing football at second base.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
If middle infielders aren't given a little leeway around the bag, we're going to be taking second basemen to the hospital every other game. Baseball isn't intended to be a contact sport. There's no way players can last for six months if they start playing football at second base.
I agree with that, Artie, but I don't think the answer is to tell a middle infielder he doesn't have to touch the bag. I also wouldn't tell a first or third baseman that (and first carries just as big of an injury risk if his tagging foot is stepped on by a runner).
I don't want baseball to be a contact sport, certainly not, but there are occassions where contact occurs, and I don't agree that a middle infielder should be able to turn a double play without possessing the ball and touching second base at some point during the process.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
If middle infielders aren't given a little leeway around the bag, we're going to be taking second basemen to the hospital every other game. Baseball isn't intended to be a contact sport. There's no way players can last for six months if they start playing football at second base.
Which is sort of the point I think Passan is making. Presumably replay will take away that leeway--to an extent. As I understand it, teams will only be given so many "challenges." If that's the case, would a manager want to burn one on a phantom tag play in the 1st inning? Maybe, Maybe not. But if the manager chooses to challenge, or the play occurs in the 8th inning rather than the first, and replay shows the fielder off the bag at the time he catches the ball, then I think the umpires will be compelled to call the runner safe.
The risk of a challenge may cause the fielder to stay on the bag longer. If that's the case, then does baseball need to change the rules regarding how a player must slide?
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
If middle infielders aren't given a little leeway around the bag, we're going to be taking second basemen to the hospital every other game. Baseball isn't intended to be a contact sport. There's no way players can last for six months if they start playing football at second base.
Which is sort of the point I think Passan is making. Presumably replay will take away that leeway--to an extent. As I understand it, teams will only be given so many "challenges." If that's the case, would a manager want to burn one on a phantom tag play in the 1st inning? Maybe, Maybe not. But if the manager chooses to challenge, or the play occurs in the 8th inning rather than the first, and replay shows the fielder off the bag at the time he catches the ball, then I think the umpires will be compelled to call the runner safe.
The risk of a challenge may cause the fielder to stay on the bag longer. If that's the case, then does baseball need to change the rules regarding how a player must slide?
I think baseball probably should change the rule on how a player must slide. It makes a lot more sense to me than allowing a middle infielder to get crippled, and certainly makes more sense than him not having to touch the bag. I'm trying to come up with a safe solution for plays at the plate, because those collisions are crazy and I don't see them really adding much value to the game. But you almost have to eliminate a catchers ability to block the plate if you force a runner to slide.
Offline
"does baseball need to change the rules regarding how a player must slide?"
I think so. Maybe if you change it so the runner has to be able to tag the base with his foot and not his hand. It won't prevent the play like in last year's LCS when Holliday nearly crippled Scutaro, but it'll cut down on defensive players clearing the bag by five feet to avoid a runner who can get his fingernail on the bag.