You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



11/17/2014 12:17 pm  #1


Miller for Heyward

STLCardinal Baseball reporting Cards sent Shelby and Tyrell Jenkins to Atlanta for Heyward and Jordan Walden.

 

11/17/2014 12:18 pm  #2


     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 12:25 pm  #3


Re: Miller for Heyward

Braves' website is confirming.

Is Walden the guy who jumps off the rubber during his delivery?

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 12:33 pm  #4


Re: Miller for Heyward

I'm okay with this. I figured it would take something to get him, but that's not "too" much I don't think.

 

11/17/2014 12:33 pm  #5


Re: Miller for Heyward

Really like this move, subject to the Cardinals being able to re-sign Heyward.  Artie, I think you're correct about Walden's delivery, but he throws hard and was a former closer in Anaheim.  He gives the team some depth behind Rosenhausen.

 

11/17/2014 12:35 pm  #6


Re: Miller for Heyward

He's a reliever with a sub-3 ERA I like guys like that!

Shame to see Miller go, always felt like he had another gear that he just never really got to. But this is a good move for the Cardinals.

 

11/17/2014 12:40 pm  #7


Re: Miller for Heyward

My first reaction is favorable. You've added a bat to a lineup that depserately needs one, and you've upgraded defensively. You've also replaced Neshek.
Downside: You're giving up some financial control, and it's a bust if you don't re-sign Heyward (hopefully Moz has already worked out or has agreed to work out an extension). You lose a durable major league starting pitcher who may not have hit his ceiling. And even though Jenkins has never advanced above A-ball, with his stuff there's a chance in five years he could be at the top of the Braves' rotation.

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 12:48 pm  #8


Re: Miller for Heyward

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 12:56 pm  #9


Re: Miller for Heyward

I'm iffy on the trade. Obviously I'm a big Miller fan, so it sucks to see him go. I'm also a huge Heyward fan and two-thirds of the outfield defense is going to be exceptional, especially when Peter Bourjos is out there.

However, Heyward isn't anyone's idea of a power hitter. At best the Cardinals probably added a 15-20 homer guy when they needed 25-30. They're also ridiculously lopsided against lefties. A run saved is as good as a run earned, but it seems like they're basically throwing their hands up and saying "we don't have the chips to get a power hitter, we don't trust Tulowitzki's health, so we'll just double down on speed and defense." It's not a bad play. The Royals went to the World Series with it. But it also means another year of sweating out 2-1, 3-2 games.

 

11/17/2014 12:58 pm  #10


Re: Miller for Heyward

tkihshbt wrote:

I'm iffy on the trade. Obviously I'm a big Miller fan, so it sucks to see him go. I'm also a huge Heyward fan and two-thirds of the outfield defense is going to be exceptional, especially when Peter Bourjos is out there.

However, Heyward isn't anyone's idea of a power hitter. At best the Cardinals probably added a 15-20 homer guy when they needed 25-30. They're also ridiculously lopsided against lefties. A run saved is as good as a run earned, but it seems like they're basically throwing their hands up and saying "we don't have the chips to get a power hitter, we don't trust Tulowitzki's health, so we'll just double down on speed and defense." It's not a bad play. The Royals went to the World Series with it. But it also means another year of sweating out 2-1, 3-2 games.

You tend to follow the prospects as well as anyone. What's your take on Jenkins?
 

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 1:12 pm  #11


Re: Miller for Heyward

He really came on strong this year. The P-D did a story on him just this weekend about how he cleaned up his mechanics. Ground ball pitcher with a hard, hard sink.

 

11/17/2014 1:54 pm  #12


Re: Miller for Heyward

I like this trade.  I think the cards had to get a bat.  A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be.  It is an improvement.  I know they lost 2 good players and I think the braves did well.  However the cardinals are going to have to give something to get something.  If they believe in their system like they claim then miller will not be hard to replace.  As alz said, he seemèd to have another gear he never got to.  That is a polite way of saying he is under preforming.  Hopefully a reasonable extension can be worked out.  If not, oh well.  A team has to do something to win now once in awhile.  Now they need a right handed power bat to platoon.

 

11/17/2014 2:01 pm  #13


Re: Miller for Heyward

APIAD wrote:

I like this trade. I think the cards had to get a bat. A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be. It is an improvement. I know they lost 2 good players and I think the braves did well. However the cardinals are going to have to give something to get something. If they believe in their system like they claim then miller will not be hard to replace. As alz said, he seemèd to have another gear he never got to. That is a polite way of saying he is under preforming. Hopefully a reasonable extension can be worked out. If not, oh well. A team has to do something to win now once in awhile. Now they need a right handed power bat to platoon.

Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

 

11/17/2014 2:05 pm  #14


Re: Miller for Heyward

APIAD wrote:

I like this trade. I think the cards had to get a bat. A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be. It is an improvement.

Yeah, they are better than they were in October, but Heyward moves them closer to the 2013 Cardinals. That was a good offense, but it also relied heavily on hitting with RISP. They didn't hit many home runs that year and at best that's what they'll be in 2015. I just don't see a sudden increase in runs coming.

 

11/17/2014 2:35 pm  #15


Re: Miller for Heyward

alz wrote:

APIAD wrote:

I like this trade. I think the cards had to get a bat. A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be. It is an improvement. I know they lost 2 good players and I think the braves did well. However the cardinals are going to have to give something to get something. If they believe in their system like they claim then miller will not be hard to replace. As alz said, he seemèd to have another gear he never got to. That is a polite way of saying he is under preforming. Hopefully a reasonable extension can be worked out. If not, oh well. A team has to do something to win now once in awhile. Now they need a right handed power bat to platoon.

Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

Last edited by forsberg_us (11/17/2014 2:36 pm)

 

11/17/2014 2:52 pm  #16


Re: Miller for Heyward

forsberg_us wrote:

alz wrote:

APIAD wrote:

I like this trade. I think the cards had to get a bat. A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be. It is an improvement. I know they lost 2 good players and I think the braves did well. However the cardinals are going to have to give something to get something. If they believe in their system like they claim then miller will not be hard to replace. As alz said, he seemèd to have another gear he never got to. That is a polite way of saying he is under preforming. Hopefully a reasonable extension can be worked out. If not, oh well. A team has to do something to win now once in awhile. Now they need a right handed power bat to platoon.

Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

In all of those seasons, Heyward wasn't yet 25 years old. I'm just saying it's too early in his career for us to assume he's playing the best baseball he can.

Edit He also had injuries in 2011 and 2013 that cost him 30 and 50 games respectively. 20 HRs on a full season should be expected, maybe a few more as he continues to grow as a hitter. Not saying he will, he could go Craig mode and never be seen to have another competent AB again. I'm just saying if he hasn't "peaked", I won't be shocked. 
 

Last edited by alz (11/17/2014 2:57 pm)

 

11/17/2014 2:59 pm  #17


Re: Miller for Heyward

What I do wonder though is what Upton would have cost. Seems like he's on the block too.

 

11/17/2014 3:23 pm  #18


Re: Miller for Heyward

alz wrote:

What I do wonder though is what Upton would have cost. Seems like he's on the block too.

Which one? Justin probably would have cost more than Heyward. The Braves will probably let you have B.J. if you agree to pick him up at the airport.

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 3:28 pm  #19


Re: Miller for Heyward

artie_fufkin wrote:

alz wrote:

What I do wonder though is what Upton would have cost. Seems like he's on the block too.

Which one? Justin probably would have cost more than Heyward. The Braves will probably let you have B.J. if you agree to pick him up at the airport.

Justin. No position change to stick him in right field, and it looks like the Mariners are in line to pick him up. 

 

11/17/2014 3:39 pm  #20


Re: Miller for Heyward

alz wrote:

artie_fufkin wrote:

alz wrote:

What I do wonder though is what Upton would have cost. Seems like he's on the block too.

Which one? Justin probably would have cost more than Heyward. The Braves will probably let you have B.J. if you agree to pick him up at the airport.

Justin. No position change to stick him in right field, and it looks like the Mariners are in line to pick him up. 

If they make that move, and unless they get Cano coming back, I'm not sure what John Hart is doing in Atlanta. Seems like he's just making moves to remind everyone how brilliant he was in Cleveland. 
The Braves finished next-to-last in runs scored and allowed the third fewest runs in the NL last year. I'm not sure shipping out your corner outfielders for pitching is going change that equation.

     Thread Starter
 

11/17/2014 4:12 pm  #21


Re: Miller for Heyward

I do think the Cardinals making their biggest trade in 2+ seasons 35 minutes ahead of Gov. Nixon deploying the Guard and declaring a state of emergency in preparation of the Officer Wilson Grand Jury recommendation sucks. 

Farewell front page news! We barely knew each other, but it was special!

 

11/17/2014 4:17 pm  #22


Re: Miller for Heyward

forsberg_us wrote:

alz wrote:

APIAD wrote:

I like this trade. I think the cards had to get a bat. A 15 to 20 hr guy is better then grichick is going to be. It is an improvement. I know they lost 2 good players and I think the braves did well. However the cardinals are going to have to give something to get something. If they believe in their system like they claim then miller will not be hard to replace. As alz said, he seemèd to have another gear he never got to. That is a polite way of saying he is under preforming. Hopefully a reasonable extension can be worked out. If not, oh well. A team has to do something to win now once in awhile. Now they need a right handed power bat to platoon.

Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

Getting morse to add to the mix would certainly be interesting.   Now the cards have 2 positions that are platoonable.  Also late innings you need a righty on the bench unless u want to see the middle of the order get torn apart by left sspeciaist

 

11/17/2014 4:25 pm  #23


Re: Miller for Heyward

APIAD wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

alz wrote:


Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

Getting morse to add to the mix would certainly be interesting. Now the cards have 2 positions that are platoonable. Also late innings you need a righty on the bench unless u want to see the middle of the order get torn apart by left sspeciaist

While I agree with the sentiment, I have a feeling the righty on the bench is either Grichuk or Piscotty.

Right now the team needs a RH hitter who plays first and third.

Bottom line, at this point they're only looking at bit pieces.  The team is pretty much set. and its only mid-November.

 

11/17/2014 4:31 pm  #24


Re: Miller for Heyward

alz wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

alz wrote:


Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

In all of those seasons, Heyward wasn't yet 25 years old. I'm just saying it's too early in his career for us to assume he's playing the best baseball he can.

Edit He also had injuries in 2011 and 2013 that cost him 30 and 50 games respectively. 20 HRs on a full season should be expected, maybe a few more as he continues to grow as a hitter. Not saying he will, he could go Craig mode and never be seen to have another competent AB again. I'm just saying if he hasn't "peaked", I won't be shocked. 
 

I hope you're right.  As someone who had Heyward in fantasy last season and watched him hit 11 HR in a relatively injury free season, perhaps I'm a tad bitter.

 

11/17/2014 4:35 pm  #25


Re: Miller for Heyward

APIAD wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

alz wrote:


Heyward hit 27 homeruns not too long ago. At 25, I have no reason to think his power numbers will decline anytime soon. I'm still holding out hope they did get a 25-30 HR guy myself. 

In his other 4 seasons, Heyward hit 18, 14, 14 and 11 HR.  The 27 HR season was likely an outlier.  I like the trade, but think we need to be reasonable about what we got.  It's a major upgrade defensively, and the team gained some speed.  The interesting question is whether Heyward is more than a platoon guy.  Last season his splits against lefties were terrible (.169/.225/.477).

I like the fact the Cardinals also improved the bullpen.  It was a weakness last season.  Walden is a nice additional piece.

Getting morse to add to the mix would certainly be interesting. Now the cards have 2 positions that are platoonable. Also late innings you need a righty on the bench unless u want to see the middle of the order get torn apart by left sspeciaist

One other thing--I don't think they're going to platoon Heyward, even if his numbers suggest they should.  Heyward is headed into free agency.  Presumably the Cardinals made this trade with the intent of signing Heyward long-term.  They're going to want to see what he can do against LHP.  Also, if the Cardinals platoon him, my guess is there's no chance Heyward re-signs.  He'll sit occasionally, just like every player.  But barring an injury, I'd expect him to play 150 games.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]