Offline
Although they were overshadowed by Pujols, Edmonds and Rolen were impact bats. And McGwire obviously fits the definition.
I’ll agree with you about Beltran, but a 2009 version of Matt Holliday would vastly improve this team. While it would be nice to get a guy who could hit 40 HR, more important to me is getting a guy who might drive in 100+ runs. Allen Craig wasn’t a huge power guy, but a pre-injury Allen Craig would really help.
The Cardinals haven’t had a player drive in more than 85 runs since Holliday did it in 2014. Molina led the team last year with 82. That was 55th in baseball. That’s unacceptable, or at least it should be.
Offline
2011 berkman should be getting some love in this conversation.
Hell, a 2008 troy glaus wouldnt be bad.
Those guys were both one and sone players who brought value without much risk. I brought them up but that is just the type of move i expect and dislike. This cardinals team needs a player to build around. Neither glaus or berkman were centerpieces. They were additions to pujols and holiday. Both actually.
Offline
APIAD wrote:
2011 berkman should be getting some love in this conversation.
Hell, a 2008 troy glaus wouldnt be bad.
Those guys were both one and sone players who brought value without much risk. I brought them up but that is just the type of move i expect and dislike. This cardinals team needs a player to build around. Neither glaus or berkman were centerpieces. They were additions to pujols and holiday. Both actually.
I would put Berkman in the same category with Beltran—an aging veteran they took a chance on who exceeded expectations. Like you, that sort of move wouldn’t thrill me.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
JV wrote:
So, is anyone disappointed that Stanton won't allow the Cards to empty their system of prospects for him?
Yes. I couldn't care less about a bunch of prospects, the majority of whom will never make a serious impact in the major leagues.
To be clear, I agree with Artie, I never expected the Cardinals to make the deal, but that's the type of bat they need.
I absolutely agree that they need to upgrade the offense in a big way, but we've been down this road so often in the DeWitt Era that I've memorized the street signs.
Here's how it goes: Media reports Cardinals are "all in" on Thumper McTavish. Front office spokesman says they are willing to "kick the tires" on McTavish, but the cost has to be reasonable. McTavish ends up signing with/being traded to another team. Cardinals continue to accumulate dry powder while the Cubs win 100 games and the division.
Offline
So if stanton is unwilling to come to stl and for whatever reason, the fo is against jd Martinez, who is left. Nobody imo
Offline
I'm not buying the Stanton won't come to St. Louis crap. The "Max" in me wonders if this nugget of info wasn't disseminated by the Cardinals to give them an excuse if they can't get something done. The less sinister side of me says it's at worst a leverage move by Stanton.
Offline
I find it hard to believe the Cardinals would make the type of financial commitment they need to make to land Stanton.
Are there any urinals left from the old stadium? I'll buy a couple if they promise to put it toward Stanton's salary.
Offline
Im not convinced the "stanton wont come to stl" is true but i could see it. And it has made me think how the other options don't compare. Martinez could be a centerpiece. However, everything else imo is more the same of what they already have. Do you think cargo is really an improvement over piscotty or grichuk? The FA list vs the current starters on the cards are the same as the comparison i listed. Maybe slightly bettet but not a difference maker. This team needs a difference maker.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
I find it hard to believe the Cardinals would make the type of financial commitment they need to make to land Stanton.
Are there any urinals left from the old stadium? I'll buy a couple if they promise to put it toward Stanton's salary.
Hard for me to believeas well but they do have the resources both in money and prospects. If you are going to spend the prospects a return like stanton would be nice. I know i could talk till i was blue in the face but i hope stanton takes his opt out.
Offline
Stanton first, votto second for mvp voting....wierd coming from such shitty teams.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
I find it hard to believe the Cardinals would make the type of financial commitment they need to make to land Stanton.
Are there any urinals left from the old stadium? I'll buy a couple if they promise to put it toward Stanton's salary.
I share your skepticism, but the one thing that seems a little different is the team is catching heat locally, and there has been plenty of discussion about the lack of butts in the seats at the end of the year.
There’s a lot of speculation that attendance could start trending down. Reportedly, the secondary markets got killed last year (people who buy tickets just to list them on StubHub and profit) The decrease in people going to games hurts them in concessions and at Ball Park Village. If people actually stop buying tickets, they’ll have to do something.
One other thing that can’t be disregarded—they’ve finished behind the Cubs in back-to-back years. By a lot. That’s putting a lot more pressure on them than if the Pirates or Brewers had won the last 2 division titles.
Offline
Ballpark village is the kicker to me. It is a great profit machine but it is either a double win or double lose. If you do bad a busch you do bad a ballpark village.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
I find it hard to believe the Cardinals would make the type of financial commitment they need to make to land Stanton.
Are there any urinals left from the old stadium? I'll buy a couple if they promise to put it toward Stanton's salary.I share your skepticism, but the one thing that seems a little different is the team is catching heat locally, and there has been plenty of discussion about the lack of butts in the seats at the end of the year.
There’s a lot of speculation that attendance could start trending down. Reportedly, the secondary markets got killed last year (people who buy tickets just to list them on StubHub and profit) The decrease in people going to games hurts them in concessions and at Ball Park Village. If people actually stop buying tickets, they’ll have to do something.
One other thing that can’t be disregarded—they’ve finished behind the Cubs in back-to-back years. By a lot. That’s putting a lot more pressure on them than if the Pirates or Brewers had won the last 2 division titles.
Good. Maybe one of the good things to come out of the Rams' departure from St. Louis is there's even more focus on the Cardinals to perform well, because the only other team in town is the Blues.
In a related event, I usually listen to AM radio in the morning for the traffic report, which is preceded by a sports segment at the quarter-hour. The reporter qualified Stanton's selection as NL MVP with "Future member of the Red Sox ..."
I wanted to rip the radio out of the dashboard.
Offline
APIAD wrote:
Ballpark village is the kicker to me. It is a great profit machine but it is either a double win or double lose. If you do bad a busch you do bad a ballpark village.
I've done a bad bush or two, back in the day. It's not pleasant.
Offline
Cards make formal offer to marlins for Stanton.
Offline
APIAD wrote:
Cards make formal offer to marlins for Stanton.
Come on Giants!!
Offline
No indication of who the Cardinals are offering. If Reyes ends up moving, I'll be upset.
Offline
Mags, who is the most likely cardinals taken by rule 5?
Offline
"The San Francisco Giants have offered second baseman Joe Panik and two prospects for Stanton and second baseman Dee Gordon, according to Sirius XM Radio’s Craig Mish."
"Meanwhile, the St. Louis Cardinals have have offered a package for Stanton, according to Fox’s Jon Paul Morosi. Their offer is believed to be built around young pitching prospects."
Offline
APIAD wrote:
Mags, who is the most likely cardinals taken by rule 5?
My guess is Patrick Wisdom, assuming he hasn't been added. I've yet to check the final news.
I just checked and confirmed what I expected. The four pitchers left unprotected are each long shots and a team would have to be very thin on pitching to take a flyer on one of them. Poncedeleon has shown the most promise but he has yet to come back from the very serious beaning he took about a third of the way through the season. I don't know if he is ready to resome pitching, much less stick on on someone's ML roster.
Last edited by Mags (11/20/2017 10:44 pm)
Offline
Cardinals must be pretty low on wisdom. I was suprised to see a guy with 31 home runs and 89rbis left off the 40 man. I think i read that the front office views wisdom as a AAAA player. Imo, id classify bader as that.
Offline
APIAD wrote:
Cardinals must be pretty low on wisdom. I was suprised to see a guy with 31 home runs and 89rbis left off the 40 man. I think i read that the front office views wisdom as a AAAA player. Imo, id classify bader as that.
The CW on Wisdom is he strikes out too much, doesn't hit for average and doesn't have a defensive position. But the power numbers do jump out at you, and he last year posted the highest OPS of his career since he played at the low-A level.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
APIAD wrote:
Cardinals must be pretty low on wisdom. I was suprised to see a guy with 31 home runs and 89rbis left off the 40 man. I think i read that the front office views wisdom as a AAAA player. Imo, id classify bader as that.
The CW on Wisdom is he strikes out too much, doesn't hit for average and doesn't have a defensive position. But the power numbers do jump out at you, and he last year posted the highest OPS of his career since he played at the low-A level.
What’s his launch angle and exit velocity?
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
artie_fufkin wrote:
APIAD wrote:
Cardinals must be pretty low on wisdom. I was suprised to see a guy with 31 home runs and 89rbis left off the 40 man. I think i read that the front office views wisdom as a AAAA player. Imo, id classify bader as that.
The CW on Wisdom is he strikes out too much, doesn't hit for average and doesn't have a defensive position. But the power numbers do jump out at you, and he last year posted the highest OPS of his career since he played at the low-A level.
What’s his launch angle and exit velocity?
I don't know about exit velocity but I am confident that he'll never match Carpenter's launch angle. Just ask Jennifer.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
APIAD wrote:
Cardinals must be pretty low on wisdom. I was suprised to see a guy with 31 home runs and 89rbis left off the 40 man. I think i read that the front office views wisdom as a AAAA player. Imo, id classify bader as that.
The CW on Wisdom is he strikes out too much, doesn't hit for average and doesn't have a defensive position. But the power numbers do jump out at you, and he last year posted the highest OPS of his career since he played at the low-A level.
Interesting. You've got some good sources. All along, I've been reading about how strong he is one defense but the box scores don't seem to bear that out. He's supposed to have the strongest infield arm in the Cardinals system but it has seemed to me that he has a problem with accuracy. One of the things that bothered me last year was seeing a guy with his alleged arm putting in so much time at first base. But of course a lot of that was a consequence of giving Diaz some time at 3rd.
Aside from his strikeout rate, a big problem is his age. Once a guy hit's 26, there's an almost irrebutable presumption that he just doesn't have that many good years in the future. I don't know if that has always been true. Harvey Haddix was 26 when he went 2 and 2 in 1952. The next year he was a 20 game winner. He had 12 more seasons after that. But for the most part guys who haven't made it by 26 really don't get much of a chance, and very few have productive years if they so.
Last edited by Mags (11/21/2017 3:32 pm)