Offline
Nothing that happens in a court room surpises me anymore, but I'd guess the defense is going to have a tough time selling this one.
Offline
They are saying that the kid drown in the pool on the 16th and the father helped cover it up. Defense also accused the father of sexually abusing Casey since the age of 8 conditioning her to lieing. The father isnt coming acrossed as being truthfull and the brother supposively can back up the abuse story. The defense shot pretty big holes in the case. I lean in favor of the state most the time but if this comes down to who is better in the courtroom the defense has a huge advantage.
Last edited by APRTW (5/24/2011 3:23 pm)
Offline
She's accused of drowning her toddler and trying to hide it from the cops for a month. A Lifetime movie is in the works.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
She's accused of drowning her toddler and trying to hide it from the cops for a month. A Lifetime movie is in the works.
The drowning part was a suprise and claimed to be an accident. The ladder was left down on the pool. I dont think they knew what the cause of death was. Another weird thing about the case is that a meter-maid saw the remains in the wooded area they were found in and called it in several times over the course of 2 or 3 months yet nobody found them. It took him showing the police where they were to come up with them. I dont know what happend but I knew she was guilty and now I want to hear more about Casey's dad. Their is something he isnt saying. He is an excop so maybe that is why he wouldnt give the defense a straight answer but it seemed to me like he was hiding something. I think he knew the kid was dead and played along with Casey untill his wife caught on.
Another thing I didnt know was that Casey and the girl lived with her parents. How do you not notice a kid not being around the house for a month? Oh, and Casey's brother took a test to prove the kid wasnt his. This family has to be fucked up.
Offline
don't know why, but i just googled this.
this is my hunch about the defense 'bombshells':
casey anthony is guilty as hell. is she killed her daughter to give herself a new life. she is facing the death sentence and is going to go down unless the defense can pull of a miracle, which in this kind of trial means a smearfest that casts doubt about everyone and everything remotely involved.
1. the grandparents: casey and daughter moved out at least a day before the presumed murder, and their attempts to see their granddaughter were all brushed off with lies.
2. the sex abuse charges: standard operating procedures. "she came from a fucked up background. her dad raped her. her brother raped her." blah, blah, blah. is there any evidence of any of this, other than that her brother was asked/required to give a dna specimen for a paternity test, which . . . SURPRISE . . . showed he wasn't the father of his niece.
Their client is going to fry, and in a desperate attempt to save her, they will paint everyone in the vicinity with guilt-colored spray cans. Nothing new under the sun.
Offline
"Casey's brother took a test to prove the kid wasnt his."
Since the case is taking place in Central Florida, I think that's implied.
Offline
There is no evidence yet of the sex abuse. I assume witnesses will be brought up to back that story up. If not this defense doesnt work unless Casey takes the stand. The father is playing right into this defense because he is coming acrossed as shady on the stand. The defense doesnt have much pysical evidence against Casey. What they do have is weak and hard to understand. I am not saying she didnt do it but I think the defense has a good shot of getting a hung jury, mistrial or innocent results.
Offline
according the the wikipedia article:
June 16: Casey and Caylee move out of Casey's parent's house
June 21: she writes a diary entry, "I have no regrets, just a bit worried. I just want for everything to work out okay. I completely trust my own judgment & know that I made the right decision. I just hope that the end justifies the means. I just want to know what the future will hold for me. I guess I will soon see -- This is the happiest that I have been in a very long time. I hope that my happiness will continue to grow -- I've made new friends that I really like. I've surrounded myself with good people -- I am finally happy. Let's just hope that it doesn't change." After having googled searched phrases including: "neck breaking," "how to make chloroform," and "death".
July 15: Caylee reported missing by her grandmother, after receiving numerous blow-offs from her daughter.
July 16: Casey arrested for making false statements
etc.
May 24, 2011: Defense attorney opening statement claims Caylee died June 16 of accidental drowning.
Sorry, but I cannot connect the dots from a daughter's accidental drowning, to a month-long mystery as to the daughter's whereabouts and everything else the mother did.
One thing that is very sad is that Caylee would have died when she was about 2 years and 10 months, and having some experience in these matters, I can say that there are few things on Earth more life affirming than a little baby daughter who is about 2.5 to 3.5 years old.
Last edited by Max (5/25/2011 3:22 am)
Offline
I doubt the trial is decided on a wikipedia page. I didnt say she would get off. I said it would be interesting.
"Sorry, but I cannot connect the dots from a daughter's accidental drowning, to a month-long mystery as to the daughter's whereabouts and everything else the mother did. "
The grandmother and grandfather also lived in the house were this girl disappeard from. Dont you think it is odd that it didnt alarm them sooner that there granddaughter was missing?
Offline
My reading made me think that Casey moved out the day before the child died. Then stonewalled every opportunity for them to see their grandbaby.
Truth? No idea, that's just what I read.
If she's guilty of this, I hope she receives the death penalty. As bad as murder is, sometimes I can understand how it occurs. A fight with someone turns bad, you come home to catch your wife sharing your bed with someone, a robbery gone awry.... I'm not saying it's right, but I can understand how it falls out. This? I hope to God this little girl accidentally drowned in the pool and for some stupid reason they tried to cover it all up. If not, there is no execution method brutal enough to make me feel justice was done.
Sadly reading what I have, which in no means makes me a legal expert (that's all on fors), I don't see the jump to cover up an accidental death. I don't care how many times she was used as a cock-cushion at the family reunions. Given the google searches that it was said they found on her computer "How to make Chloroform" and "Effecient neck breaking" being a few of the topics, and her journal entries listing out her happiness and sure she made the best choice for her happiness, though there are second thoughts.... WHAT THE FUCK.
My instinct says she's guilty as sin, and if so I would bring back China's "Slow Slicing" execution method to punish her.
Offline
APRTW wrote:
The grandmother and grandfather also lived in the house were this girl disappeard from. Dont you think it is odd that it didnt alarm them sooner that there granddaughter was missing?
It would be if it had happened that way, but as both Alz and I wrote, the information that is available to us indicates that Casey and Caylee moved out on June 16 and then Casey stonewalled every attempt by the grandparents to see their grandchild.
Offline
Actually I saw one story that indicated she moved out on June 9. In any event, she was out of the house before the girl disappeared. I think the last time the grandmother saw the little girl was on a nursing home visit to see another relative. The mom had already moved out by that point.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Actually I saw one story that indicated she moved out on June 9. In any event, she was out of the house before the girl disappeared. I think the last time the grandmother saw the little girl was on a nursing home visit to see another relative. The mom had already moved out by that point.
I see that now. I believe there defense will be that the father made her move out on the 16th after the drowning. The defense claim that he found the body in the pool. Again, I am not saying I believe it but in my mind they went from having no chance to having an real shot.
Offline
APRTW wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
Actually I saw one story that indicated she moved out on June 9. In any event, she was out of the house before the girl disappeared. I think the last time the grandmother saw the little girl was on a nursing home visit to see another relative. The mom had already moved out by that point.
I see that now. I believe there defense will be that the father made her move out on the 16th after the drowning. The defense claim that he found the body in the pool. Again, I am not saying I believe it but in my mind they went from having no chance to having an real shot.
to having a shot, anyway. you are probably correct about that. but look at the cost. did you see the other person they smeared? that meter reader who found the body! what a suspicious guy, finding the body like that . . . maybe he MOVED it???
this defense tactic was tried, and failed (although it came close to working), before for those despicable vermin, Lyle and Erik Menendez. I was living in Beverly Hills at the time, and the murder happened a few blocks from my apartment, so it was big news where I lived. After murdering their parents and getting caught, they made up a self-defense story that involved years of sexual and psychological abuse by their parents. It was very ugly and it did not keep their asses out of jail for what will probably be the rest of their lives.
Offline
I think I need to get a fork and start eating my words on this deal. The defense clearly spent all their time on the opening statement and not on the case. As I stated earlier I thought the opener was awesome. If the case was presented right I thought they had a real chance of beating the case. Now the defense looks lost. Upon reading about the defense attorney I learned that he is a deadbeat dad, home is being forclosed on, wasnt allowed in the FL bar for 8 years, has been bankrupt and ran a non profit online bikini sales website. The judge and prosecution are beating him up pretty bad. He cant even question the witnesses without getting every other question objected to. Some of what I have seen I think he has a point to but I think he has pissed the judge off so bad that he isnt going to let it slide. the sotry I read said that they were not sure if he was even being paid. I think he has just taken this case to promote himself. The prosectution is effectively boring the jury to death with days to video, statements and other evidence of Anthony lieing.
Offline
I meant to comment on this earlier, got busy and forgot. While the opening statement was sensational and loaded with shock value, it created one major problem--the only person who can substantiate any of it is Casey Anthony--and no attorney in his right mind can put her on the stand. She can explain the partying, she can't explain the lies and she can't explain the forensic evidence. In the end, the prosecution will stand up, point out that the defense failed to deliver on any of its opening promises and failed to controvert any of the prosecution's eveidence.
You hit on the only way the prosecution loses this case--the make the case so complex they lose the jury. If the jury gets confused, that suggests reasonable doubt. They need to keep it simple and wrap it up. ,
Offline
I have actually watched alot of it. They are boring the shit out of me right now. I fast forwarded through most of it. However they are drilling into the heads of the jury pictures of the remains. That isnt veiwable to the public but I doubt the defense will be able to get those photos out of the jurys minds. I thought the prosecution lacked a drive home piece of evidence. One that pointed to Casey. I still believe they do. What they are using instead is drilling the lies into the juries heads. You can get past one lie but she has lied and lied and lied. Biaz sucks in court but they guy who looks and sounds like the KFC man does a pretty good job. They should go with him untill the prosecution rest. then Biaz will have to run with his story telling to make anything stick.
I think Biaz is being a douche. Dont get me wrong I am for the prosecution. However if Biaz was doing his job he would have plead this case out and save casey's life.
Offline
Fors, back to your point about the shock value of the opening statement and Casey being the only one to validate it. I believe you are correct but it seems that the defense has to have something up there sleeve. They knew it was going to be a two month long trial and the shock of opening satements would wear off by day three. I have to wonder what the defense has to bring to the table. Somebody has to validate these claims or they were pointless to bring up. Either defense is stupid or there is something major yet to come. For it to hold an weight it would have to be the dad, mom or brother to make the claims. I still swear the father is lieing about something. The lifetime movie twist would be that he is the father of his daughters kid and covered it up to keep that fact hidden.
Offline
I haven't followed it that close, but if I remember didn't the father already deny the abuse. I suppose the mom could always testify about it, but that leads tot the question, if she knew did she do anything to stop it. I remeber an allegation that her brother took a paternity test to confirm he wasn't Casey's father. If it wasn't one of those over-the-counter jobs, I suppose that can be verified. But the bottom line is that if she wants the jury to believe that the child drowned and that she simply handled the aftermath badly, she has to testify. And if she does, she has to be ready to explain everything else.
The thing is, the court rules allow you a lot of latiitude with your opening statement, but closing argument is limited to the actual evidence. Her side can't get back up and argue any of these "theories" unless they put in some evidence to support them. With the way the trial is going, the defense could be the prosecution's best friend. If the jury is getting that bored, a wild, sensational last couple of days could be helpful, particularly if the whole defense comes off as a load of BS.
Offline
Reading a bit more on the testimonials.... Brother says that Casey had no emotion at all when she told him the baby was missing. Casey piled on lie after lie after lie to the police. Casey never called 911 to report the kiddo missing, not ever. Why not? Well because the nanny kidnapped her, so I could handle that. The nanny that doesn't exist, who watched the kid while I worked a job I didn't really have.
...... slow down. The amount of lies told to this point in official statements to police alone are enough to put this bitch behind bars for quite some time... I don't know the sentencing details but what is the going rate for 125 counts of false official statement.....
Does all of this mean she killed her baby? Not necessarily, but with the journal entries, search history on the computer, defensive and evasive answers/stance with investigators, downright lies being told to police on official statements..... I believe she killed her baby, and if the jury finds her guilty, I hope they give her a 10 year sentence in general population and then execute her publicly.... This case just steams my ass to even read about. What a f**king b**ch!
Offline
I am less interested in seeing Casey hung on the courthouse lawn and more interested in the angles that both sides take in trying to prove there sides. Her actions and the crime is sicking but it happens every day. This case just got brought to the public because she is hot. The defense is bring up some good points but so far it in my mind it hasnt been enough to make me think she didnt do it. I am sure they have alot more to say. I have watch alot of this case but still hear the medias take on things. The jury doesnt hear that. The opinion a jury has is truely there own opinion.
Offline
If anyone has been paying close attention to the trial you are seeing the concern I had for the states case come to light. So far some of the defenses highlights are pictures of Caylee opening the sliding glass door leading to the pool and cimbing the pool ladder pretty much by herself. The defenses experts witnesses have cast doubt on the science used to determine that the smell in the truck was a dead body. Casey's brother comfirmed that the family hid the pregnancy from him. The bigget shocker might hae been when Casey's mom admitted she was the one for searched fo cloriform on their home computer. To me his has hung jury written all over it. I am trying to take into account that the jury knows little about the case other then what the state and defense has told them. Their opinion isnt effected by the media.
Offline
Verdict has been reached. Will be annouched in 45 minutes. That will be at about 1:15pm.
It only took the jury about 11 hours to reach whatever it has dicided. That, IMO is quick and likely mean a guilty verdict. I am almost positive of it. I thought the defense did a much better job in closing. A guilty vertict would be a suprise to me because I thought the defense did a better job of showing doubt then the prosicution did of showing guilt. I didnt think the jury would convict basicly because of just lieing. It seems, with the quick verdict this will be a good suprise.