Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
Maybe someone with a better memory than mine can help out. I have a vague recollection that the reason Tony Womack came available in 2004 was either that he was still recovering from Tommy John surgery or that he was still rehabbing after not having the surgery and the Red Sox didn't think he'd be ready in time to start the season. I have some recollection that whatever Womack's situation, his recovery was much faster than expected. Anyone else remember or am I making this up?
I think you're right. The Red Sox dumped him and picked up Mark Bellhorn, he of the 300-foot-pop-up-off-the-foul-pole in the eighth inning of Game 1 of the 2004 World Series.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
"This team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized mistakes."
LMAO!!! You do remember that the team released Adam Kennedy before his contract expired, don't you?
Yes, but they made us suffer at least one season too long. They ate 1/3 of an Adam Kennedy sized contract if my memory serves me.
Offline
Max wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
"This team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized mistakes."
LMAO!!! You do remember that the team released Adam Kennedy before his contract expired, don't you?Yes, but they made us suffer at least one season too long. They ate 1/3 of an Adam Kennedy sized contract if my memory serves me.
You expected them to release him the day after Jocketty signed him?
Offline
They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense. That was business.
How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?
Offline
"They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense. That was business."
Kennedy was terrible his first season, after which I seem to remember it was revealed he was going through marital issues. Kennedy hit .280 his second and last season with the team.
"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"
Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat.
Keep tilting at those windmills.
Offline
"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"
As long as the Juan Gonzalez Era lasted.
Offline
"Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat. "
Exactly, we didn't trot him out there even once. That was my point. He was brought in to play second base, it didn't work out, and they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and went with Womack. The business side of that was small enough that they went purely baseball. Kennedy was different; it was a three year deal and they weren't going to eat "an Adam Kennedy sized contract".
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"
As long as the Juan Gonzalez Era lasted.
What's Greg Vaughn up to these days?
A: About 350 pounds.
Offline
Max wrote:
"Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat. "
Exactly, we didn't trot him out there even once. That was my point. He was brought in to play second base, it didn't work out, and they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and went with Womack. The business side of that was small enough that they went purely baseball. Kennedy was different; it was a three year deal and they weren't going to eat "an Adam Kennedy sized contract".
R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard.
The fact of the matter is they ate $4M of Kennedy's contract. In 2011, they ate about $3M combined when they released Franklin and Batista. Does that mean they're going to cut ties with Furcal and his $7.5M? Nope. But right now I'm not sure they have a better option at SS even if they wanted to cut him. You want them to sign Stephen Drew?
Offline
To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era. The problem was his hitting was so atrocious they couldn't justify rolling him out there, even with his plus range. And he didn't help himself by sulking when he wasn't in the starting lineup.
Offline
"R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard. "
Corrected on that. But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy. Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts.
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era.
This discussion get me thinking of the rotating door at 2B. The first I remember was when they signed Vina to, what I recall was a 3year deal. He got injured and that opened the door for Bo Hart. Then there was the fiasco of Marlon (not Spivey) who was quickly replaced by Womack. Then what was it, Grudz, Kennedy, . . .
The La Russa era was more marked by quantity at 2B than by quality.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
"They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense. That was business."
Kennedy was terrible his first season, after which I seem to remember it was revealed he was going through marital issues. Kennedy hit .280 his second and last season with the team.
Didnt he also have knee and eye issues? One or the other? I cant remember now.
Maybe that was Greene now that I think about it.
Last edited by APIAD (11/15/2012 10:59 am)
Offline
artie_fufkin wrote:
To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era. The problem was his hitting was so atrocious they couldn't justify rolling him out there, even with his plus range. And he didn't help himself by sulking when he wasn't in the starting lineup.
Kennedy had one of his best years in 2009 for OAK. He got a bunch of playing time at third somehow. Since then he has declined but remained in the majors and somewhat servicable. If anything a case could be made that the Cardinals didnt really have to release Kennedy and playing Skip at second could have been avoided. Basicly Kennedy was released because of a his crying and not producing two year prior to being cut.
It would be plain reckless and stupid to release Furcal without giving him an honest look Max. All I expect is a solid plan b.
Offline
I look at Kennedy's stats and I think half of the 16 RBI he had last year came against the Cardinals during that 4-game series in L.A. early in the season.
Offline
Max wrote:
"R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard. "
Corrected on that. But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy. Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts.
Does any team sign player and immediately release them?
Offline
"The La Russa era was more marked by quantity at 2B than by quality."
You could say that about any era probably since Rogers Hornsby retired. Honestly, outside of Joe Morgan and Robby Alomar, how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years? Robby Cano, I suppose, but he's got to do it for a few more years before he's considered in all-time terms. These days, it's usually a spot where old shortstops who still have a little bit left in their bat go to finish out their careers.
Offline
"Does any team sign player and immediately release them?"
The NFL has those 1-day contracts so future Hall of Famers like Jerry Rice can retire with the team with which they're most closely associated. I think Greg Maddux may have done the same thing with the Braves.
But in the context to which you're referring, the closest I can come is the Lawn Gnome's *tenure* with the Reds, which I think lasted about as long as the lunch buffet at a Chinese restaurant.
Offline
Of course not "immediately", that's called a "straw man" when someone unfairly characterizes another person's argument for the purposes of ridiculing it; refer to the SEC echo chamber discussion for an example of me doing that to Fors' argument about why Obama won.
But the Cardinals 2B offers excellent examples of cutting bait quickly. Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004, Tony Womack was brought in last minute and got 553 ABs.
Offline
"how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years?"
I'm not so partisan as to overlook Ryne Sandberg.
Offline
Max wrote:
"how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years?"
I'm not so partisan as to overlook Ryne Sandberg.
I, on the other hand, am.
Offline
I add would add Jeff Kent, Craig Biggio and Ryan Sandberg to the list. I guess it depends on your idea of truely great.
Offline
"Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004"
I recall Anderson coming up with some big pinch-hits that year. That may not have been the role they envisioned for him when they signed him, but he wasn't an airball like Junior Spivey or Juan Gone.
Not entirely germain to the discussion, but maybe it should be pointed out.
Offline
Max wrote:
Of course not "immediately", that's called a "straw man" when someone unfairly characterizes another person's argument for the purposes of ridiculing it; refer to the SEC echo chamber discussion for an example of me doing that to Fors' argument about why Obama won.
But the Cardinals 2B offers excellent examples of cutting bait quickly. Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004, Tony Womack was brought in last minute and got 553 ABs.
Max wrote:
Corrected on that. But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy. Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts..
Offline
"Basicly Kennedy was released because of a his crying and not producing two year prior to being cut."
That, and if I remember correctly, Kennedy blew off Winter Warm-up the off-season he was released. That's a big deal to the team unless there's a pretty good reason to miss.