You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



11/14/2012 2:59 pm  #101


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

forsberg_us wrote:

Maybe someone with a better memory than mine can help out. I have a vague recollection that the reason Tony Womack came available in 2004 was either that he was still recovering from Tommy John surgery or that he was still rehabbing after not having the surgery and the Red Sox didn't think he'd be ready in time to start the season. I have some recollection that whatever Womack's situation, his recovery was much faster than expected. Anyone else remember or am I making this up?

I think you're right. The Red Sox dumped him and picked up Mark Bellhorn, he of the 300-foot-pop-up-off-the-foul-pole in the eighth inning of Game 1 of the 2004 World Series.

 

11/15/2012 12:02 am  #102


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

forsberg_us wrote:

"This team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized mistakes."

LMAO!!!  You do remember that the team released Adam Kennedy before his contract expired, don't you?

Yes, but they made us suffer at least one season too long.  They ate 1/3 of an Adam Kennedy sized contract if my memory serves me.

 

11/15/2012 12:19 am  #103


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Max wrote:

forsberg_us wrote:

"This team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized mistakes."

LMAO!!!  You do remember that the team released Adam Kennedy before his contract expired, don't you?

Yes, but they made us suffer at least one season too long.  They ate 1/3 of an Adam Kennedy sized contract if my memory serves me.

You expected them to release him the day after Jocketty signed him?

 

11/15/2012 12:56 am  #104


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense.  That was business.

How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?

 

11/15/2012 8:09 am  #105


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense.  That was business."

Kennedy was terrible his first season, after which I seem to remember it was revealed he was going through marital issues. Kennedy hit .280 his second and last season with the team.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/kennead01.shtml?mobile=false

"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"

Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/spiveju01-bat.shtml?mobile=false

Keep tilting at those windmills.

 

11/15/2012 9:45 am  #106


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"

As long as the Juan Gonzalez Era lasted.

 

11/15/2012 10:22 am  #107


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat. "

Exactly, we didn't trot him out there even once.  That was my point.  He was brought in to play second base, it didn't work out, and they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and went with Womack.  The business side of that was small enough that they went purely baseball.  Kennedy was different; it was a three year deal and they weren't going to eat "an Adam Kennedy sized contract".

 

11/15/2012 10:24 am  #108


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

artie_fufkin wrote:

"How long did we keep trotting Junior Spivey out there after it was clear he wasn't what was needed?"

As long as the Juan Gonzalez Era lasted.

What's Greg Vaughn up to these days?

A: About 350 pounds.

 

11/15/2012 10:40 am  #109


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Max wrote:

"Junior Spivey never played a game as a Cardinal. He was sent to the minors and never played well enough to earn a major league at bat. "

Exactly, we didn't trot him out there even once.  That was my point.  He was brought in to play second base, it didn't work out, and they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and went with Womack.  The business side of that was small enough that they went purely baseball.  Kennedy was different; it was a three year deal and they weren't going to eat "an Adam Kennedy sized contract".

R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard.

The fact of the matter is they ate $4M of Kennedy's contract. In 2011, they ate about $3M combined when they released Franklin and Batista. Does that mean they're going to cut ties with Furcal and his $7.5M?  Nope. But right now I'm not sure they have a better option at SS even if they wanted to cut him. You want them to sign Stephen Drew?

 

11/15/2012 10:43 am  #110


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era. The problem was his hitting was so atrocious they couldn't justify rolling him out there, even with his plus range. And he didn't help himself by sulking when he wasn't in the starting lineup.

 

11/15/2012 10:49 am  #111


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard. "

Corrected on that.  But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy.  Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts.

 

11/15/2012 10:52 am  #112


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

artie_fufkin wrote:

To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era.

This discussion get me thinking of the rotating door at 2B.  The first I remember was when they signed Vina to, what I recall was a 3year deal.  He got injured and that opened the door for Bo Hart.  Then there was the fiasco of Marlon (not Spivey) who was quickly replaced by Womack.  Then what was it, Grudz, Kennedy, . . .

The La Russa era was more marked by quantity at 2B than by quality.

 

11/15/2012 10:58 am  #113


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

forsberg_us wrote:

"They sat on him a lot longer than made baseball sense.  That was business."

Kennedy was terrible his first season, after which I seem to remember it was revealed he was going through marital issues. Kennedy hit .280 his second and last season with the team.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/kennead01.shtml?mobile=false

Didnt he also have knee and eye issues?  One or the other?  I cant remember now.

Maybe that was Greene now that I think about it.

Last edited by APIAD (11/15/2012 10:59 am)

 

11/15/2012 11:09 am  #114


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

artie_fufkin wrote:

To be fair, with the exception of Mark Grudzelainek for the one season they had him, Kennedy's defense when he was healthy was as good as the Cardinals got during the La Russa era. The problem was his hitting was so atrocious they couldn't justify rolling him out there, even with his plus range. And he didn't help himself by sulking when he wasn't in the starting lineup.

Kennedy had one of his best years in 2009 for OAK.  He got a bunch of playing time at third somehow.  Since then he has declined but remained in the majors and somewhat servicable.  If anything a case could be made that the Cardinals didnt really have to release Kennedy and playing Skip at second could have been avoided.  Basicly Kennedy was released because of a his crying and not producing two year prior to being cut.

It would be plain reckless and stupid to release Furcal without giving him an honest look Max.  All I expect is a solid plan b.

 

11/15/2012 11:10 am  #115


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

I look at Kennedy's stats and I think half of the 16 RBI he had last year came against the Cardinals during that 4-game series in L.A. early in the season.

 

11/15/2012 11:12 am  #116


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Max wrote:

"R-i-g-h-t. You know Max, if you're going to try to fix a misstatement, you might want to avoid making a second misstatement. Womack wasn't signed to replace Spivey. Womack was signed in 2004 to replace Marlon Anderson and Bo Hart. Spivey was replaced by a combination of Aaron Miles and Hector Luna until they traded for Ronnie Belliard. "

Corrected on that.  But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy.  Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts.

Does any team sign player and immediately release them?

 

11/15/2012 11:17 am  #117


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"The La Russa era was more marked by quantity at 2B than by quality."

You could say that about any era probably since Rogers Hornsby retired. Honestly, outside of Joe Morgan and Robby Alomar, how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years? Robby Cano, I suppose, but he's got to do it for a few more years before he's considered in all-time terms. These days, it's usually a spot where old shortstops who still have a little bit left in their bat go to finish out their careers.

 

11/15/2012 11:23 am  #118


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"Does any team sign player and immediately release them?"

The NFL has those 1-day contracts so future Hall of Famers like Jerry Rice can retire with the team with which they're most closely associated. I think Greg Maddux may have done the same thing with the Braves.
But in the context to which you're referring, the closest I can come is the Lawn Gnome's *tenure* with the Reds, which I think lasted about as long as the lunch buffet at a Chinese restaurant.

 

11/15/2012 11:23 am  #119


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Of course not "immediately", that's called a "straw man" when someone unfairly characterizes another person's argument for the purposes of ridiculing it; refer to the SEC echo chamber discussion for an example of me doing that to Fors' argument about why Obama won.

But the Cardinals 2B offers excellent examples of cutting bait quickly.  Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004, Tony Womack was brought in last minute and got 553 ABs.

 

11/15/2012 11:25 am  #120


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years?"

I'm not so partisan as to overlook Ryne Sandberg.

 

11/15/2012 11:25 am  #121


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Max wrote:

"how many truly great second basemen have their been in the past 50 years?"

I'm not so partisan as to overlook Ryne Sandberg.

I, on the other hand, am.

 

11/15/2012 11:27 am  #122


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

I add would add Jeff Kent, Craig Biggio and Ryan Sandberg to the list.  I guess it depends on your idea of truely great.

 

11/15/2012 11:29 am  #123


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004"

I recall Anderson coming up with some big pinch-hits that year. That may not have been the role they envisioned for him when they signed him, but he wasn't an airball like Junior Spivey or Juan Gone.
Not entirely germain to the discussion, but maybe it should be pointed out.

 

11/15/2012 11:30 am  #124


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

Max wrote:

Of course not "immediately", that's called a "straw man" when someone unfairly characterizes another person's argument for the purposes of ridiculing it; refer to the SEC echo chamber discussion for an example of me doing that to Fors' argument about why Obama won.

But the Cardinals 2B offers excellent examples of cutting bait quickly.  Marlon Anderson got 253 ABs in 2004, Tony Womack was brought in last minute and got 553 ABs.

Max wrote:

Corrected on that.  But my original intent was, indeed, to contrast the fact that they ate the Junior Spivey deal from day one and they didn't with Adam Kennedy.  Thus, this team does not eat Adam Kennedy sized contracts..

 

11/15/2012 11:31 am  #125


Re: Cardinals Hot Stove 2013

"Basicly Kennedy was released because of a his crying and not producing two year prior to being cut."

That, and if I remember correctly, Kennedy blew off Winter Warm-up the off-season he was released.  That's a big deal to the team unless there's a pretty good reason to miss.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Quotes = [quote][/quote] Bold = [b][/b] Underlined = [u][/u] Italic = [i][/i] Link = [url][/url] Code = [code][/code] Image = [img][/img] Video = [video][/video]