Offline
JV wrote:
Does anyone else remember how they used to weight the medal counts (Gold = 3, Silver = 2, Bronze = 1) when publishing the "standings"? Wonder why they stopped that.
I don't remember that, but the U.S. is apparently the only country in the world that uses total medal count rather than just gold medals as the primary measurement.
Offline
JV wrote:
Does anyone else remember how they used to weight the medal counts (Gold = 3, Silver = 2, Bronze = 1) when publishing the "standings"? Wonder why they stopped that.
I have a vague recollection of that. Thought it was Gold=5, Silver=3, Bronze=1.
Offline
forsberg_us wrote:
JV wrote:
Does anyone else remember how they used to weight the medal counts (Gold = 3, Silver = 2, Bronze = 1) when publishing the "standings"? Wonder why they stopped that.
I have a vague recollection of that. Thought it was Gold=5, Silver=3, Bronze=1.
You may be right. The particulars escape me as easily as Finnish shots escaped the USA defense.
Offline
JV wrote:
forsberg_us wrote:
JV wrote:
Does anyone else remember how they used to weight the medal counts (Gold = 3, Silver = 2, Bronze = 1) when publishing the "standings"? Wonder why they stopped that.
I have a vague recollection of that. Thought it was Gold=5, Silver=3, Bronze=1.You may be right. The particulars escape me as easily as Finnish shots escaped the USA defense.
"Defense," especially in the third period, being a malleable term.